|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:06 PM Original message |
CIA employees or CIA agents? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not if they're a group contracted to the CIA. you know the Xe type? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. When I heard about this bombing, that was my first thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. it seems like it, but I'm not sure this admin wants to be as open in regards to their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. One was the station chief so you can probably assume it's one and the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. The way our MSM play with language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sorcrow (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't find it odd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. One was head of station |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. And who decided to call them "employees" instead of "agents"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. initial reports was that they were civilians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Not sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Likely the CIA, they don't want people to think groups of 4-6-8 "agents" are just standing round... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. black waters run deep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
10. It could have been a mix of both really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
11. 'CIA agents' is a subset of 'CIA employees'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. Agents are field operators--think James Bond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
15. Not everyone that works for the CIA is an "agent". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phasma ex machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 04:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. +1 Anonymous sources claim that 90+% of CIA employees work 9-5 desk jobs in the USA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. Potato/Potato. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC