Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Smerconish simulcast replaces Imus on MSNBC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:12 AM
Original message
Smerconish simulcast replaces Imus on MSNBC
What's the story with Smerconish? I never heard his radio show, just have seem him fill the 'RW pundit spot' on various cable news broadcasts. Where is he on the political spectrum? On Iraq? On Pres. Shithead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Where is he?
From what I've seen of him, mostly on his knees!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. The repubs are right...
the media keeps moving towards the liberal side :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. He's to the Right
Is he the new replacment for Imus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. it looks like it
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 09:22 AM by npincus
Imus was a registered Republican, but denounced the Iraq war, called Cheney a "war criminal", etc. Yes, they are few and far between on the OTHER side, but assuming this guy is on the Right, is he in lockstep with the majority Repub view (supporting the war) or not... I wonder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. You can get the general idea here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. oh, Jeez....
thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. He wrote a book saying we should profile Arabs at airports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. A ratings bonanza in the making, I'm sure!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. His show is painful
to watch. I assume that MSNBC isn't going to keep a significant portion of the audience from the Imus show, and they aren't going to make huge in-roads in attracting the Fox Mourning Show fans to switch. Hopefully, this too shall pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I picked the wrong time to check it out
...he had Ted Nugent on...:scared:

No thanks MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I have watched
a few minutes both yesterday and today. I think it is fair to say that the best of the show is terrible. The rest of it appears to be terrible, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Had the same experience this morning!
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 10:00 AM by Norquist Nemesis
Thought I'd give a quick check to see who/what they had done with the Imus hours and lo and behold it's another water carrying loyal Bushie at the mic. Suprise, suprise. :puke:

I wasn't an Imus watcher so I haven't really "lost" anything, but damn! Let's see...of MSNBC's "hosts" we have the "often conservative" Tucker who's claim to fame before coming to MSNBC was sitting in for The Right on Crossfire. Then there's Scarborough whose credentials are being the former Republican Congressman from the State of Florida. Chris Matthews has close ties to the Republican Party in Pennsylvania, not to mention his drooling for the past seven years over Bush and the GOP. (Anyone else notice how when Chris goes off the reservation and criticizes Bush that he goes away for a few days?) And finally, there's Olbermann who, IMO, is left of center.

I suppose that's the news media's idea of an 80/20 rule... or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. I called MSNBC yesterday and told them
that the current ratings surge for Olbermann should give them a clue. Olbermann's success should tell them that the underserved demographic is to the left. If they want to build an audience they should go left, although I told them I would settle for the middle. Then I told them that I would probably continue to listen to NPR, Amy Goodman or watch Washington Journal rather than tune into Smerconish, who, IMHO, is little more than a RW shill.

I suggested that they go for Amy Goodman. She's a helluva an interviewer, has great guests and already has a built in audience that they should try to get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronScorpio5 Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. He's a RW TOOL.
Makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Smerconish is a BushBot, and anyone who thinks Imus got
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 09:43 AM by LandOLincoln
fired because of his "nappy-headed hos" crack would probably be interested in buying the Brooklyn Bridge if it were offered to them.

No, the Bushies were looking for an excuse to get rid of Imus, and he was just stupid enough to give it to them. I didn't watch him much, but as an life-long insomniac, I can tell you there were times when it was either him or the informercials at 4:00 a.m. Too, his ranch is just a couple of hours north of me, Bill Richardson was a frequent guest on the program, so as a New Mexican I did find moments--long moments even--when I could watch and listen without wanting to drive up there and give him a good hard kick in the huevos.

I especially liked it when he started aiming his vitriol at Comandante Codpiece and his Halliburton Honchos, which of course is what really got him fired.



On edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. Smirk Jr. is a racist winger on the air in Philly.
Just last week I accidently heard two minutes of a show on which he let an idiot rant on about "the same people 'we' fought in WWII in Asia (assuming he knew the enemy were Japanese) being the same people who rampaged thru Virginia Tech" (assuming he cannot tell the difference between Koreans and Japanese). Smirk did nothing to discourage the explicit racism.

It just continues. Liberal media my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. I never watched Imus
because I didn't like his style. I would never watch Smerconish because I think he is stupid. I see him on MSNBC as the right wing jerk of the night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. He's no different than the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. Here is his platform. Decide for yourself. You may be surprised.
This is his platform. IT has been posted before. You will find that there are many things you dont agree with, but also some things that you will be surprised about.

http://www.mastalk.com/mastalk/vote.jspx


So here's my platform. As you read it, ask yourself if you agree or disagree with each point.




1. Bin Laden. I want a continuous commitment of manpower directed toward finding and killing Bin Laden and Al-Zawahiri. It matters not to me whether they are isolated, neutered, and disengaged, nor whether they are in Pakistan. I want them hunted, found and caused to suffer a heinous death. The full court press should never end.

2. Profiling. Let's look for terrorists who look like terrorists. Those who threaten us have similarities. In virtually every instance, they have race, gender, ethnicity, religion and appearance in common. Those characteristics should be considered as we seek to prevent terrorist strikes against the United States. Everyone needs to be screened, but some more than others. When the terrorists start looking like Thurston Howell, III, we will change accordingly.

3. Torture. Once we identify the bad guys, we need to glean from them information of impending attacks by any means necessary, and that includes torture. If you believe it NOT to be efficacious, tell me why our best, brightest and most experienced interrogators continually seek to use it as a technique? Answer: it works.

4. Preventing Terror. We need to implement all the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, those who were entrusted to study what went wrong pre-9/11 and recommend how to prevent its recurrence.

5. Iraq. We need an end game. And don't call it "cut and run". As a matter of fact, if anything is unpatriotic, it's not affording our soldiers an explanation of how their mission will end. It's time to articulate an exit strategy so as to light a fire under Iraqis and let them know they need to stand on their own two feet sooner than later.

6. Immigration. Our borders are porous. They need to be closed. Only when they are closed should we make decisions as to what to do with the millions who are already here illegally. It is impractical to believe we will ship them back to wherever they came from. But through attrition, and by ensuring no more of their friends and relatives join them, we will probably diminish the herd.

7. Gays. Homosexuals do not threaten my marriage. Heterosexual marriages have their own troubles, but the fate of conventional marriages has nothing to do with whether same sex couples can marry one another or partake in a civil union. No guy now married to a woman is waiting in the wings for a court decision trying to decide whether to ditch his spouse and hook up with a man. As we seek to find some accommodation for same sex couples, we need to end that false argument.

8. Abortion. I want to be registered in a party that has room in its tent for pro-life and pro-choice views. And Plan B should be sold over the counter to individuals 18 and over. And I surely don't want politicians determining my end of life plan.

9. Embryonic Stem Cells Research. Do it. Fund it. Pardon my callous nature, but that which exists in a Petri dish is undeserving of the full rights that are afforded a viable fetus.

10. Term Limits. We need citizen politicians, not professionals. Two terms in the Senate and six in the House seems like plenty to ensure we get grounded folks who are capable of earning a living when not serving us.

11. Campaign Finance. Let's stop trying to regulate campaign donations. Someone will always find a loophole. Let anyone spend whatever they are willing to affect the outcome of a race, so long as there is full and immediate disclosure, so voters can react accordingly.

12. Entitlements. Social Security, Medicare and other entitlements make up more than half of our federal spending. The number of people on Social Security and Medicare will double in the next 15 years, and life expectancy continues to grow. We cannot afford to continue the status quo. Time to confront AARP: the retirement age in this country needs to be raised from 65 to 70. Balanced Budget should not be two dirty words. I do not want my children and grandchildren saddled with paying for our wasteful spending.

13. Death Taxes. We all work so hard just trying to lead a comfortable life in the hopes of leaving nest eggs for our children. It's un-American that when we check out, Uncle Sam will be standing there with his hand out to tax our earnings for the second time. The estate tax must end.

14. Global Warming. Beats the hell out of me. But given the apparent stakes if the concerns are valid, I think we should err on the side of taking precaution.

15. Guns. A symptom, not cause of our problems. Single parent households pose more of a threat to safety than firearms. Let's address that issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC