Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Vulnerabilities May Help Dems Hang On To 60 Senate Seats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:27 PM
Original message
GOP Vulnerabilities May Help Dems Hang On To 60 Senate Seats
With the upheavals that have taken place from Democratic retirements in the past two days, are the Dems doomed to lose their 60-seat, filibuster-proof margin in the Senate this year? On close examination, this is not in any way a certain outcome -- because the Republicans have a lot to lose this year, too.

There are of course some seats that Democrats could potentially lose, and we've all heard a lot about them: Blanche Lincoln in Arkansas, Michael Bennet Colorado, the open seat in Delaware, the open seat in Illinois, the open seat in North Dakota, and Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania -- and Republicans even talk about Barbara Boxer in California. Sen. Chris Dodd's seat in Connecticut used to be at the top of this category, but today's events might well have put this seat out of the GOP's reach again.

At the same time there is a comparable number, depending on how liberally you count it, of Republican-held seats that could shift to the Democrats. Keep in mind that 2004 was a very good Senate cycle for the Republicans, with them winning nearly every state they possibly could. Now, six years later, they have a lot of territory where they have to play defense, and a wide variety of outcomes are possible.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/will-the-dems-lose-their-60-seat-edge-not-necessarily----gop-could-lose-seats-too.php?ref=fpa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree. I think this is as ill-fated as talk of a Democratic majority in 2004.
That year, the Democrats had a number of southern seats to defend that only were retained in 1998 due to an exceptionally good Democratic year. I think that we are graced with a good set-up for later this year in the senate. The next two cycles will be more challenging perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. You pass crapsurance, and we'll be slaughtered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think a lot depends on how the Pubs have alienated the
Independents. Refusing to cooperate on ANYTHING in the last year has to have ticked off some. I wonder how many? I wonder if there are also Pubs who arent happy with the Party of NO? There have to be some Pubs who are suffering because of lack of health care. They may no be the vocal ones, but I have to believe there a lot of them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Keep on whistling...
... past the graveyard.

If you don't see the anger and frustration at what the Dems have done by turning the REAL OPPORTUNITY to REFORM health care into a giant WELFARE PAYDAY for greedy corporate fatcats, then you are just plain blind.

You DON'T fuck over your base and walk away unscathed. The Dems are toast in the midterms and beyond. You heard it here first.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I am not blind. If Obama signs his health bill, it will be a definite Obama victory
...that will help the whole Dem ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. We have 59 seats
but I get the point. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. very true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC