Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interracial Couples Invest More in Kids

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 10:32 AM
Original message
Interracial Couples Invest More in Kids
Parents who are of different races, such as a white father and an Asian-American mother, spend more time and money on their kids than parents who are both of the same race, new research shows.

So-called biracial (aka interracial or multiracial) parents are more likely than their "monoracial" counterparts to provide their children with a home computer, private schooling and educational books and CDs and to make sure they participate in reading activities, dance, music or art lessons outside of school and get trips to the zoo, library and other cultural venues.

The "biracial advantage" only holds for comparisons with same-race couples from the two racial groups represented by the parents—for instance, if a Latino and white couple is compared with a Latino-Latino couple or a white-white couple. The finding disappears if all biracial couples, regardless of racial pairing, are compared with the entire pool of same-race couples (combining all couples that are white-white, black-black, Latino-Latino and so forth).

The advantage, or higher investment, can be explained as a counterweight or response to the social challenges faced by interracial couples, who only gained legal acceptance in the United States in 1970 when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a state law in Virginia that prohibited whites from marrying non-whites, said study author Brian Powell at Indiana University Bloomington.

http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/070423_biracial_parents.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think there are only just so many ways of taking the stats.
The fact that the difference disappears when all the comparison groups are merged isn't trivial, and makes me wonder how much more likely "more likely" is. It would be of interest to compare the SES/education level of the biracial couples with like monoracial couples.

I think I'll track down the article when I can get access to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The education link would be worthwhile to research.
After all, it's in schools that we are most likely to be exposed to different people of all types (races, religions, nationalities, etc.). So it would make sense you'd also be more likely to meet and fall in love with someone of a different race, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not to take credit away from interracial couples, but this is stereotypical racist BS
Edited on Tue Apr-24-07 11:25 AM by The Count
I wish these kinds of "studies" would be banned. Last one I retched about was called The Bell Curve...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. How so?
If biracial parent do indeed invest more than monoracial parents, then what is the harm in knowing that fact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. because i doubt the study really proves that
X and Z can go up at the same time

but X may not be the reason Z is going up

there could be a random factor Y that is the real reason these two go up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. i think this is purely correlational and doesnt imply causation
i am sure there is a confounding factor in there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC