Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Times Editorial Staff agrees with FDL on Gruber!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:29 PM
Original message
New York Times Editorial Staff agrees with FDL on Gruber!!!
EDITORS' NOTE

"On July 12, the Op-Ed page published an article by Jonathan Gruber, a professor of economics at M.I.T., on health insurance and taxation. On Friday, Professor Gruber confirmed reports that he is a paid consultant to the Department of Health and Human Services, and that his contract was in effect when he published his article. The article did not disclose this relationship to readers.

Like other writers for the Op-Ed page, Professor Gruber signed a contract that obligated him to tell editors of such a relationship. Had editors been aware of Professor Gruber’s government ties, the Op-Ed page would have insisted on disclosure or not published his article."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/pageoneplus/corrections.html


FDL WINS on this one.
It DOES make a difference that Gruber was On the Payroll!!!

It would be better for Krugman to just walk away from this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. ....
:popcorn: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Treating this as some sort of scandal
for the Obama administration is an indication of how far our public discourse has sunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stephinrome Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not treating it as such...
...is, unfortunately, a sign of how far the discourse on DU has sunk, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Scandal?...not so much.
What it does is highlight a group of people who will attack FDL when they are clearly right on this issue just because she has been critical of the Obama administration.

It DOES make a difference that Gruber WAS on the payroll.
His stuff has been cut & pasted all over DU by several conservative "Pro-HCR" posters as well as used by Krugman in his support for the current bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. using the editors of the NYTimes as back up to make your case= weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Because it disagrees with KittyWampus.
Haven't you been paying attention?? :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Did you agree with same paper's editorial board regarding Judith Miller? They were SO PROUD of her.
Edited on Wed Jan-13-10 12:18 PM by KittyWampus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Using logical fallacies to make your case = weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Why don't you post a link and a quote to back up your claim?
I'm going to wait an hour so you can't go back an edit your post again before I reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. blahahahhhaaaa!
so true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Who do you have to back up YOUR opinion?
I will stand with the Editorial Staff of the New York Times.
They are correct in posting this retraction.

It DOES make a difference that Gruber WAS on the payroll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Do you agree with same editorial board's stance on TARP? Judith Miller? Hiring Kristol?
Edited on Wed Jan-13-10 12:18 PM by KittyWampus
LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Well, technically, he was not on the payroll. He was given a sole source
Edited on Wed Jan-13-10 12:21 PM by Luminous Animal
contracting job within a cabinet department(several actually) to:

ASPE requires a technical memorandum on the estimated changes in health insurance coverage and associated costs and impacts to the government under alternative specifications of health system reform. The requirement includes developing estimates of various health reform proposals on health insurance coverage and cost. The alternative specifications to be considered will be derived from the President’s health reform proposal. This project is a continuation of work that Dr. Gruber is currnetly providing for ASPE. (Emphasis mine)


https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&tab=core&id=ff3e0b204ae1fd5343ab19cf3a62f160&_cview=0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, it's very important. I'm not sure it was mentioned on the Diane Rehm show just now. nt
Edited on Wed Jan-13-10 11:58 AM by Captain Hilts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not quite the same thing. FDL accused Gruber of being a paid shill. NYT is saying he had a
contract with the HHS (not administered by the White House) and that it's important to disclose it when publishing an op-ed.

There is a difference and the fact that FDL is now running away from their original accusation of a propaganda scandal is telling. FDL realizes Krugman caught them in a sensational lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-13-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. Being the recipient of a grant does not mean being on the payroll.
Edited on Wed Jan-13-10 01:14 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
It should have been disclosed and on tha tissue, the NYT is agreeing with FDL. But on FDL's assertion that Gruber was paid for...I don't think so. Otherwise just about all researchers are also government owned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC