Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Break Up The U.S. Banks That Are "Too Big To Fail"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
No DUplicitous DUpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:08 PM
Original message
Break Up The U.S. Banks That Are "Too Big To Fail"
Break Up The U.S. Banks That Are "Too Big To Fail"
(posted with permission from) http://sane-ramblings.blogspot.com/2010/01/break-up-us-banks-too-big-to-fail.html

President Obama calls the biggest bank bonuses of all time "obscene" and is talking with Congress about taxing those bonuses to recover some money for the American people.

But so far Mr. Obama can't even get tougher financial regulations or a new Consumer Protection Agency through Congress for the banking lobby buys the Congressmen.

But Mr. Obama has powers he's not using. Under the Antitrust legislation already on the books, he can direct the Attorney General to file suit to break up the banks that are "too big to fail," for they have become a monopolistic predatory trust.

A century ago, this is what Teddy Roosevelt did against the greedy corporate giants and it's time to do it again. Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan Chase and other giants need to be broken up so community banks can compete with them and to stop U.S. consumers from being gauged at every opportunity.

This is how Mr. Obama can show them "change" is coming, rather than just reacting in anger at the fleecing of the American people.

If Congress can find the courage to act, it could re institute the 1933 Glass-Steagall act, which separates banking (making traditional loans) from investment banking (trading stocks, bonds and commodities and creating exotic financial instruments). This act served the public well until it was dismantled several years ago by banking lobbyists.

These banking behemoths then had overwhelming conflicts of interest but it didn't matter to them in their aggressive pursuit of deals and massive executive bonuses, which played a crucial factor in the current economic meltdown. These conflicts of interest still exist today and already, these behemoths are back to their old ways and the sky high bonuses are just one manifestation.

America has been a great nation and it can be again. Taking financial control back from those who bled it dry, including Congress, is a vital step. But it can't happen unless you raise your voice and demand change for no President can accomplish this without your support. Let's encourage this President and give him that support.

---------------------------------

This column is right on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. A simple solution to a complex and dire issue
I don't see why it's enacted immediately.

K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. A side benefit would be smaller banks = smaller bonuses
Problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. The banks have shown that they...
can hurt... or maybe even kill the economy. They should be nationalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes Please! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Watch the segment from this morning's Washington Journal with Steve Bartlett
http://www.c-span.org/Watch/Media/2010/01/18/HP/A/28552/Steve+Bartlett+Financial+Services+Roundtable.aspx

Your head will explode.
Note how MANY times he refers to Obama's plan
as "PUNITIVE."
Listen to the callers too.

The man is EVIL.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. a business that is too big to fail it too big. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wish.
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 04:44 PM by pa28
Instead of enforcing anti-trust laws we've gone the other way now with a reform bill that institutionalizes too big to fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorekerrydreamticket Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. k&r, n/t.
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 04:37 PM by gorekerrydreamticket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. the big bankers pay for and control those who would do the "breaking up"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. I honestly don't understand why they are "monopolistic" if there are community
Banks and credit unions and savings and loans.

I'm at a credit union...always have been.

Just move your money people. You don't need the government to do anything as this is the one place you have control. Stop complaining and do something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's because they have convinced us that our economy cannot function without them and only them.(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. You miss the systemic risk to the economy
we can and should all move our money because that gives them less deposits to multiply and gamble with while having the losses replaced from the US treasury. Removing the wall between investment banking and what we think of as banks makes all their nonsense fully backed up by the taxpayer.

This isn't about us fearing the risk of our deposits or feeling we cannot take our business elsewhere but rather the dangerous connection between our government and private institutions borrowing money at 0% or so, loaning to us if inclined at a much higher rate, and/or just using the money in their covert casinos and taking the rewards while socializing the risks and paying themselves very handsomely for the exchange, rewarding the risk taking.

They have set up a system that rewards absurd risk, which would be okay except the people doing the gambling never lose but the taxpayer does. As long as we have too big to fail we can have unlimited September of 08's. This entire sector needs policing and any institution that is too big to fail should and must be broken up and if doing so is too complex or would cause further systemic risk then that institution by definition, must be nationalized.

We are absolutely talking national security here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No DUplicitous DUpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Late night, Kick...
...so the night shift might have the chance to comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
14. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC