Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How did Coakley drop 20 points in one week?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:43 PM
Original message
How did Coakley drop 20 points in one week?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Marketing...
These fuckers can do anything...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. the diebold fix is in, baby. The msm is just making it "acceptable" so there is no uproar. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Brown got Media Momentum......
Something about Baseball, and it being a man's world or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. can't piss off the RedSox fans if you want their vote...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Horsehockey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Guess baseball rules......and will make the world a better place, for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broke In Jersey Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. Don't mess with RedSox Nation...
a very narly bunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. The comment combined with spelling 'Massachusetts' wrong to make her seem ignorant of things Mass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Among other things, that's correct.
I don't know how much coverage it got in MA, but this is the classic "doesn't know how much a gallon of milk costs" mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. That plus dozen other things made her look out of touch/clueless.
Messing up which team the player played for.
Mispelling name of the state you are running in.
Taking extended vacation instead of campaigning.
Very lackluster campaign.

All put together starts to create a perception that she is just taking it for granted, doesn't even really know or connect with the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. K+R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. and a lack of media scrutiny of them......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's a conspiracy. The Truthers will explain it to us soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Her staff spelled 'Massachusetts' incorrectly and she said stupid things about the Sox. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. She din't put much into her campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. a LOT of Money
doled out by people like Rupert Murdoch so desperate for a victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. It is called "polling".
At first we had advertisements, the public got wise. Then, the corps went to PR firms, ditto. Now, the corps have moved to product placement on cable news shows.

The same with polling. We have progressed from polling to push polling and now, I don't know what to call it, but a form of polling that is controlled by companies to produce a set outcome.

With the data base on the American public so large, they can give the pollsters a list of phone numbers of handpicked samplees.

Husband and I are called 2-3 times a month (in a country of 300+million). The pollster either asks for the youngest male in the household or the youngest female (we are both older than dirt and the only two in the household). If they ask for the youngest female, they are looking for a liberal response, the youngest male, a conservative response. Any question not answered as predicted fall into the 'margin of error'.

It is a simple set up to produce a set result to get the uninformed to go with the flow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. :Pollsters didn't spell 'Massachusetts' wrong or show ingnorance of the Red Sox. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Those types of gaffes do not justify a 20+ point shift in just one week!
It's not as if Brown hasn't had gaffes of his own. They just don't get nearly as much attention

This is blatent media manipulation. Instead of merely reporting the news, they are quite obviously trying to influence public opinion to produce a desired result.

What are the Democrats to do? If they declare war on the media, the situatiuon will only get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. It wasn't a one week shift
It was more like two months.

The problem was that there weren't really any polls published during that time (early November to early January) except one poll near the end of that period showing her up by 17 points.

What doesn't make sense is that SHE didn't appear to see it coming. Surely the DNC or the candidate would run INTERNAL polls that should have kicked her into gear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. The two gaffs suggest an ignorance of things in Massachusetts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
31. So how do you explain PPP showing her dropping 20 points.
The Democrats want her to lose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. Or energize her campaign. Even Obama got motivated.
One manipulative tool follows another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeJG Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's called a lying, manipulating press, spin it to fit the phoney vote machine numbers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Creating reality, as Rove put it, iirc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. kick for more responses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. 1 right wing poll with mythical numbers, magnified over the media for hours and hours
and days & days..
self fulfilling prophetical propaganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Untrue
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 09:04 AM by FBaggins
The first poll out which showed her in real danger was a Democratic polling firm (PPP).

Other than the Rasmussen numbers (which at the time showed her UP by 9), nobody else even STARTED a SAMPLE that showed her in trouble until after that PPP poll was released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. PPP is Democratic polling organization.
PPP shows Brown up 5.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/ma/massachusetts_senate_special_election-1144.html

Also Suffolk isn't what I would call a right wing polling firm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
25. Media and democrats whining when she was at + 10 told GOPers that they could win.
This got the RWers out of the wood while the other side got in hiding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
27. So, so far, the consensus is this has nothing to do with policies
It seems to be either:

Opinion polls are fixed, and the real polls probably will be too

or:

She made a couple of gaffes not to do with policy, or politics for that matter, and the MA electorate thinks that's enough for a 20% swing

Either is rather a depressing outlook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. That's the wishful thinking consensus, yes
If the exit polls look anything like the internals for the latest polls, we'll be lucky if that spin sticks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
45. BBC radio reports on it point to a claim by Brown to want to stop "behind-the-scenes" negotiations
They asked 2 voters why they were voting Republican, and that's what they said; then an interview with Brown had him saying the same thing. He seems to have managed to paint himself as an 'honest, open' politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
32. i blame the progressives at DU.






































:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Why not? Everybody else does! ;-) (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. Yep, we did it. Let the blame-fest begin... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazyjoe Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
37. Maybe the negitive ads were turning people off ? i don't know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
39. Just shows the polls are not as accurate in smaller states
There's another example in the Dem. primary in NH.

They are all over the place. Maybe an off year special election near the holidays is not as poll-able as standard elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
40. Her Baseball Gaffe?
apparently American's are more concerned with their politicians knowing more about local sports vs the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
41. The debate sank her. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JenniferJuniper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
42. She was a terrible candidate who ran a terrible campaign but
the good news is that Brown will be out in 2012 and we won't be stuck with her for six.

Not exactly a win/win, but things could be worse. His term could be a lot longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
43. She doesn't like campaigning.
And the other side is still pissed about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC