Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salon: The Pentagon's chronic neglect of Iraq vets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 08:51 AM
Original message
Salon: The Pentagon's chronic neglect of Iraq vets
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/04/25/walter_reed_groups/?source=rss

The Pentagon's chronic neglect of Iraq vets

Military officials knew long ago about the failure to take care of America's war wounded at the beleaguered Walter Reed hospital.

By Mark Benjamin

April 25, 2007 | WASHINGTON -- When the Walter Reed scandal exploded in the media in February, bringing wide attention to inadequate care for veterans at the Army's flagship hospital, Defense Department officials expressed shock and claimed ignorance. Dr. William Winkenwerder Jr., the assistant defense secretary who oversees military medicine, declared at a press conference on Feb. 21: "This news caught me -- as it did many other people -- completely by surprise."

But Salon has learned that the Defense Department had been conducting monthly focus group discussions with soldiers treated at Walter Reed since before the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq had even begun, and that it continued to do so as wounded veterans of those conflicts arrived at the facility. The interviews with outpatients were set up to monitor Army healthcare and provide military officials with direct information about it.

"They were trying to find out the good and the bad and the ugly," said a former Defense Department official familiar with the DoD focus groups. "That is the good-news story. The bad-news story is they did not do anything about it."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. A country that would invade another country for lies and trumped up evidence
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 09:04 AM by Solly Mack
isn't going to be all that concerned with taking care of the troops used toward that end...in fact, to such a country, it would be far better if no living reminders were around that would continue to remind people of the lies of government.

Less treatment and more neglect - and maybe they'll die or fall so far between the cracks no one knows they exist. The quicker they die, the sooner the country can move on and forget the ugly of government lies and deception.

But then maybe I'm just jaded. I'm sure such a thought is comforting to some...That Solly, she's just jaded and without hope...cause if Solly's right, how ugly would that be?

As always, my government is welcome to prove me wrong.

So far, they haven't...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Forced to go to war on a 'best case scenario' they weren't given the resources ...
to handle these vets.

FOR EXAMPLE: They assumed that Walter Reed could handle all of the injured. They ended up emptying out some wards at Bethesda Naval and buying the extra buildings outside the WRAMC gates to make room.

Because of Rumsfeld, the military's been playing 'catch up' almost since the beginning of the war.

'Neglect' isn't the right term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. We Support The Troops And Veterans (Bullshit) K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Shut Up! Only Republicons, Support the Troops!
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 10:20 AM by genie_weenie
I'd like to be outraged but I and my Marine brethren have known this since at least 2003...

SUPPORT THE MISSION
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=734461&mesg_id=734461
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. OK, but for people with short attention spans, we can still try to
educate, inform, remind! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree, but it's so distressing
to see people I know who held Clinton to task for Kosovo (timetables, why are we in a civil war, no mission, etc) and then can hold the exact opposite positions with Bush.

And reading comments from those (other sites) who have never seen war or death rabidly pushing continued involvement.

Sigh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC