Ellen Ratner: What's Really Going On In Massachusetts

By Ellen Ratner


I really don’t understand why people and pundits are having such a field day with the Massachusetts Senate race. Of all the places I have lived in my life, I have logged more years in the Bay State then any other. That makes me feel qualified to add one more piece of punditry, and here it is.

Massachusetts is a liberal state only to a point. It has had Republican governors such as William Weld and Mitt Romney. It was also the first state to legalize gay marriage and it has the nation’s lowest divorce rate. It is a state that prides itself on rugged New England individualism and that means its resident don’t think that they have to tow any specific political line all the time -- be it liberal or conservative.

Martha Coakley is in trouble for three reasons:

1. She does not have a warm and fuzzy personality.
2. She did not work hard at campaigning for the job. She figured that once she won the Democratic primary the seat held by the late Senator Edward Kennedy would be hers.
3. Massachusetts has its own insurance plan and it has already cost much more than anyone anticipated. The Bay State citizens are wary of any more government health care plans because they don’t trust the numbers as they relate to the cost.

I think Martha Coakley is going to pull it out and win the Senate race. I do not think this election is about President Obama or even about his health care plan taking over the private sector.

As the famous Massachusetts Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill said, “ All politics is local”. He was right then and right now. This race is about Massachusetts and not a national referendum on who is in the White House.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/01/19/ellen-ratner-martha-coakley-obama-massachusetts-senate/

Local local local.

the health care issue is a NATIONAL one - they just have had a previous local experience with it.

and to have you reporting on the scene. Thanks, Will. As always, great reporting.

:eyes:

yes, it's primarily her fault that she's in such a pickle. Now why don't you attempt to respond cogently to the points Ellen makes?

I've personally witnessed the national Dems swoop down and take over at the first sign a candidate in an important race starts struggling, no matter how easy it looked like it was going to be going in. Coakley ran a sucktastic campaign but she was inexperienced and ill-prepared for a serious general election challenge. The DNC and DSCC have no such excuse. The SECOND Brown was within 15 points of Coakley they should have been all over her campaign.

Seems to me her opponent had far less experience. And the DNC and DSCC certainly raised money for her.

How about the Progressives, most of whom prefer to snipe from the sidelines and pretend they (we) are above it all?

Yeah, we have so much Conscience. So much we can't get away from the computer and actually campaign. Might be bad for our too-cynical-to-be-bothered "street cred".

Note to the "that says more about you than me" and "sez you" and other nyah-nyahs: not only is my non-existent Prog divinity not the issue, this isn't all about YOU, either. This is what happens when we, altogether, develop a Consumerist attitude toward politics, like we hired Mr. O. to be our personal shopper. I'm hoping that we win this one in a squeaker and take it as a lesson learned painfully rather than fatally.

We'll know about the election in a few hours. We ALREADY know about what we need to do.

And buy a good pair of walking shoes; November is closer than we think.

--d!

Sure sounds like a national tie in to me....

in that Mass. residents already have healthcare. That does change the dynamic of the race.

From their point of view, what's to stop them from saying, "I got mine; get your own state-level plan"? I think Brown is trying to appeal to selfishness, which can work for Republicans.

There is dissatisfaction with Romneycare, but not urgency at the level of that seen over the national plans.

as in "pulling" something attached to a line. Tow the boat into shore... tow the barge down the river, tow the line that the Dems are pitching...

But, you're right. It's supposed to be "toe" the line as in people all standing in a row against a line marked on the ground - you want your toes to be touching the line.

...

They can't wait to get started with the 'referendum on Obama and Dems' meme.

"In a contest with major national implications, Massachusetts voters chose a successor to the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy on Tuesday in a down-to-the-wire election that became a referendum on President Barack Obama's sweeping health care overhaul and his first year in office."
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2010/01/19/politics-us-massachusetts-senate_7285977.html

Exhibits A-Z :eyes:

There has never been a losing campaign without plenty of specifics upon which to hang blame.

But the fact remains that many flawed campaigns win when the candidate is with the political trend.

Of course there are specific circumstances. And there were here in VA. And there were in NJ.

But there is a very real national trend.

she literally ran one of the worst campaigns I've ever seen.

Deeds was AWFUL.

But he wasn't losing by 17% awful.

Coakley is running in a blue state and for the seat held by a MA icon.

She is right. The state of this race has little or nothing to do with what the national party or the Obama administration has or hasn't done. And Massachusetts is not necessarily the liberal oasis many people think it is.

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

they don't like theirs. Even if we got single payer, some people would be complaining about the details. I could not care less about personality, though I know most voters are pretty shallow. The idea that seat was easy to win is understandable - in fact it's still a shock that state would bring us a teabagger who will derail our agenda.

It's all in what the MSM will make of it, wants of make of it.

because that makes all the difference in the world! :sarcasm:

:-(

like, was she advised to run "conservatively" - i.e. just slide. Not make waves.

She's never been a great campaigner, and she was trying to run a campaign based on competetency and experience. She just took for granted that she would win, which was a huge mistake.