Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 55.92% SCOTT P. BROWN 42.87%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:46 PM
Original message
MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 55.92% SCOTT P. BROWN 42.87%
Number of Precincts 254
Precincts Reporting 23 9.1 %
Total Votes 11714
Number of Uncast Votes 1
MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 6550 55.92%
SCOTT P. BROWN REP 5022 42.87%
JOSEPH L. KENNEDY LIB 126 1.08%
Write-in Votes 16 0.14%

http://www.cityofboston.gov/elections/currentelections/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. well that's kind of dishonest....those are returns from Boston only....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. And she should be doing MUCH better in Boston than that...
However, we don't know which precincts there are reporting. Boston has its (small) hotbeds of conservatism, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. It is 66 32 now
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Title is misleading, this is only for Boston...but great news for that area
anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
42. Um, no it is not, needs to be 70% or more for her to have a small chance in hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. It's already over, but she did get 70% in Boston. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. You need to edit your post to state that this is for Boston ONLY.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 08:48 PM by Connie_Corleone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. That is for Boston only..right?
Enough to counter the opposite results in the suburbs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's not the Senator from BOSTON it's the Senator from Massachusetts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. But cities like Boston have the largest number of registered voters.
And if Mayor Menino activated his voter turn-out machine, Martha will be in good shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Not BUTS.. it's misleading..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanana1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. It's the senator from PART of Massachusetts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. If she's only getting 55% in Boston she's DONE. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. No surprise there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. If those are the Boston-only numbers, that doesn't look good.....
I think she'll have to carry the Hub by a lot more than that margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. 59.35-39.47 now!
MARTHA COAKLEY..............DEM..............11938..............59.35%
SCOTT P. BROWN..............REP...............7940..............39.47%
JOSEPH L. KENNEDY...........LIB................204...............1.01%
Write-in Votes..................................33...............0.16%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. okey sorry
everyone is posting that Brown is winning based on the small precincts... isn't Boston a pretty populated area of Mass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. 52% Brown 47% Coakley with 36% reporting for MASSACHUSETTS, which is what matters
http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/senate/results.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. UTTERLY OFF THE CHARTS HORRIBLE.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 08:54 PM by Statistical
Coakley should be 20-25pts ahead in Boston.

Brown will sweep rural areas so in Coakley only built up a 12pt lead in the largest urban center in the state it is done.

Nice misleading headline though OP. Got me excited for a second or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. She's up by 28 points now.

MARTHA COAKLEY..............DEM..............38545.........63.16%
SCOTT P. BROWN..............REP..............21813.........35.74%
JOSEPH L. KENNEDY...........LIB................586..........0.96%
Write-in Votes..................................80..........0.13%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. What make you "happy", getting people's hopes up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. seems like Duers want her to lose
everyone is reporting what the media is saying- well what to do you expect from them?

Why don't we wait until the most populated areas come in before giving up all hope?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Seems like you're a real piece of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. uh thanks...
for giving me the opportunity to use this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Nice. You're making a real splash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanana1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. I agree that you're being pessimistic...
And you seem to be enjoying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Thank you newbie, for peering into my mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanana1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. I've been here since 2004.
I had to re-register because of a glitch, oh wise one. Are you going to drink some champagne now that you've been proven right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. really, whoever you are, go away. /ignore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. FIX YOUR SUBJECT!
(Sorry, I don't usually shout.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. Boston numbers are important, but it may not be enough. Thanks for trying to keep our spirits up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. thanks for understanding
I don't think we should give up at least until Boston's numbers are in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terra Alta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. don't get my hopes up
like that... please amend your title to say these results are BOSTON only...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. It is looking better for Coakley in Boston now.
MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 30039 60.58%
SCOTT P. BROWN REP 18993 38.31%


SENATOR IN CONGRESS
Total
Number of Precincts 254
Precincts Reporting 88 34.6 %
Total Votes 49582
Number of Uncast Votes 5
MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 30039 60.58%
SCOTT P. BROWN REP 18993 38.31%
JOSEPH L. KENNEDY LIB 480 0.97%
Write-in Votes 70 0.14%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. 64% to 35% now. ( n/t )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. excellent!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. This is the textbook definition of disruption.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
33. What is the population of Boston?
I see people losing hope because we are down 3,000 in a small conservative precinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. About 600,000(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
38. 67 31
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. 68 30
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC