Barney Frank warned: "reduce military budget," Not Social Security or Medicare:

$57,000 per minute spent in Afghanistan

snip

".....Imagine, for a moment, when you read about the multi-millions going into further construction at Bagram Air Base, or to the mercenary company that provides "Lord of the Flies" hire-a-gun guards for American diplomats in massive super-embassies, or about the half-a-billion dollars sunk into a corrupt and fraudulent Afghan election, what a similar investment in our own country might have meant.

Ask yourself: Wouldn't the U.S. have been safer and more secure if all the money, effort, and planning had gone towards "nation-building" in America? Or do you really think we're safer now, with an official unemployment rate of 9.7%, an underemployment rate of 16.8%, and a record 25.5% teen unemployment rate, with soaring health-care costs, with vast infrastructural weaknesses and failures, and in debt up to our eyeballs, while tens of thousands of troops and massive infusions of cash are mustered ostensibly to fight a terrorist outfit that may number in the low hundreds or at most thousands, that, by all accounts, isn't now even based in Afghanistan, and that has shown itself perfectly capable of settling into broken states ....."

snip

http://motherjones.com/politics/2009/09/afghanistan-numbers





Per-capita Defense Spending 1962-2014 (inflation-adjusted 2009 dollars)



"In February 2009, Congressman Barney Frank, D-Mass., called for a reduction in the defense budget:

"The math is compelling: if we do not make reductions approximating 25 percent of the military budget starting fairly soon, it will be impossible to continue to fund an adequate level of domestic activity even with a repeal of Bush's tax cuts for the very wealthy.

I am working with a variety of thoughtful analysts to show how we can make very substantial cuts in the military budget without in any way diminishing the security we need... well-being is far more endangered by a proposal for substantial reductions in Medicare, Social Security or other important domestic areas than it would be by canceling weapons systems that have no justification from any threat we are likely to face...."

snip


Total 2010 Defense Spending: $685.1 billion

change from 2009-2010 +3.0%



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States

We've always spent a fortune on defense, it doesn't look like it's too terribly out of proportion from the past. Interest on debt is though. We've got to get a handle on both of them if we don't want to cut social security and medicare.

billion (inflation-adjusted dollars) until the bush admin, when it suddenly rose precipitously to over $800 billion (constant inflation-adjusted dollars). Interest spending, otoh, ballooned 80s through 90s, shrank, & is predicted to balloon again after 2010.

That's what I'm looking at. I know why we're in this mess, the Iraq War and the Bush Tax Cuts. But we're still here. How are we going to get out? Raising taxes definitely needs to be part of the equation. But I don't think we can raise taxes enough to offset this deficit, can we?

80s-90s.

Total defense spending, otoh, has already exceeded the historical values presented in the chart -- in constant dollars.

which is the number one reason defense interest payments are rising.

But that spending still wasn't the equivalent of Vietnam, Korea or WWII. Certainly it is higher than 1976 or 1993, but it can be reduced as Iraq and Afghanistan are reduced. What about interest on the debt?

or in fact, today's military-related spending is higher than during the vietnam war.

the chart doesn't include the 40s & 50s, so in terms of the *chart*, korea & ww2 are irrelevant.

what the chart shows is that ballooning defense spending under bush has contributed more than ballooning interest on military debt. the debt is a function of the spending, not the other way round.

But that spending will be reduced as we get out of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Isn't that what I said?

We're still left with the debt in the future. Interest is going to explode. One way to reduce that is to reduce the debt. The chart already shows defense spending going down.

There is nothing we can do about what Bush spent on the war.

We have to cut military spending. We simply cannot afford the military we have. We cannot afford to have troops all over the world. Our economy does not support that kind of war machine any more.

Every other country evidently has STOPPED doing that -- !!!

stopped invading other countries in order to establish democracy.

Hell, the Chinese have invaded us with cheap poison crap and we welcome it with open arms.

What happened to our country?

Re China -- try to buy anything lately that isn't made in China?

I had bought a new garlic press -- you know you use it to mince garlic --

I love red --

NEVER thought about this until one night I noticed the "red" was coming off with the garlic?

They're still selling these things at Kings Supermarket!!

We're also giving money to the Vatican "faith based" organizations -- !!!

Love that one!!

:)

One reason defense spending isn't cut is that there are thousands of jobs in that sector...one of the few that grew in the past decade. War is big business.

As a species, we will annihilate ourselves if we continue to FORCE our will on "the other."

As the Doomsday Clock moves ever closer to Midnight, it's time for the human beings to realize, "Might Makes Right as it leads us down the path to extinction."

If we keep it up, we'll be lucky to leave the place (Mother Earth) to the cockroaches.

It is less than 33% of the cost of the ongoing of the occupation.

I'm sorry that I ever doubted him.

Anyone else see a pattern of bigger and bigger waves caused by Republican deficit spending (Nixon, Reagan, Bush)?

Consider the costs: All fresh water has to be shipped in; Transporting personnel to/from the base; all goods have to be shipped in (no trade with Cuba), etc. We are only holding onto Guantanamo Bay out of pure spite -and the expense can't be worth it.