Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CATO Institute: Bush Had Largest Rise In Discretionary Nondefense Spending

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 10:57 AM
Original message
CATO Institute: Bush Had Largest Rise In Discretionary Nondefense Spending
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 11:02 AM by berni_mccoy
And this report is from 2004.

http://www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp87.pdf

Only LBJ outpaced Bush's Discretionary Nondefense spending.

From the report:

Another excuse given for the current fed- eral spending binge is that national security needs are driving up the budget. Certainly, defense spending has increased dramatically since the late 1990s, particularly since 9/11. However, Figure 4 shows that discretionary nondefense spending has risen almost as rapidly as defense spending in recent years. The president’s new budget shows that real discretionary defense spending will increase 36 percent between FY2001 and FY2005 and nondefense spending will increase 25 per- cent. These increases are much larger than increases under most recent presidents.



Figure 5 shows the cumulative real discre- tionary nondefense spending increases dur- ing the first terms of recent presidents. Each president’s first year in office is set at a base of 100. Only Lyndon Johnson outpaced President Bush’s spending.


Bush increased the Discretionary Nondefense spending more than half a trillion dollars in his first 3 years as President. Perhaps Pres. Obama wants to take a bite out of that. Unless you all think that 1/2 a trillion spent by Bush and the Neocons in Congress was worthwhile spending.... you should be waiting to see what Obama's plan is before jumping to conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. The donut hole, most likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush* had the largest increase in Spending PERIOD
He spent more in eight years than all other Administrations combined. He truly was like a drunken sailor after payday..Only he didn't have the money to spend, he put it on the cuff and let your grandchildren deal with it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Very true, but this report came out before Bush's 2nd term where he did a great deal more damage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. my co-worker yesterday said that Obama has printed more money in
one year than any other past president. Don't know where to find info to disprove this but it struck me wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. But you see, there weren't any tea baggers during Bush II and Cheney said deficits didn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah!
It's only when Democrats are in control that spending or the deficit becomes an issue. Reagan proved that. And thus shall it ever be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Sad. On the flip side you have the same people here who attacked Bush
For wasteful spending who are now attacking Obama for trying to control the very waste Bush created.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Reaganomics spends money, just not on the people.
Cato is an organization that arose out of the Powell Memo. You can have spending on corporate interests or no spending on the public interest. Same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Could it be that Obama wants to reduce the spending on corporate interests?
Or are you not going to even give him that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You tell me. I can only look at what I have seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why don't you say you trust that Bush's 1/2 trillion discretionary spending was worthwhile
expenditures? You'd rather believe that than believe Obama would reduce waste in that spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Because it wasn't.
I'm not going to engage in any straw dog conversations. I'll wait and see what he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I'm glad you are holding your opinion of this decision until after you hear the details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. My economic sense tells me I'm probably not going to like it
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 07:32 AM by mmonk
but I will also listen before rendering judgement. I do not know what is all in it. An economy like our needs spending stimulus more than tax cuts. Something that can turn over dollars and at least provide temporary work to jumpstart some job creation. My post secondary education was in economics and government. I wrote my thesis on Jack Kemp's economics proposal which ended up being Reaganomics (saying it wouldn't work in the long term).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. +1
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 01:31 PM by tridim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. You libs and yer stinkin faks
Bring on the missing white chicks, nothing to see here, move along. This is old news, we have to leave it there.

(upi402 seeks full time employment at any major media outlet, medical benefits not required)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yeah, facts can be annoying to the paranoid and fear mongers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC