Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guardian: Jack Straw was warned the Iraq War was Illegal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:43 PM
Original message
Guardian: Jack Straw was warned the Iraq War was Illegal
Warned by the government's lawyers. The Iraq Inquiry has nailed him. And just ahead of the Poodle's appearance. I have never felt closer to and international tribunal, and may never feel that way again. So, here is the article:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jan/26/chilcot-iraq-inquiry-jack-straw

No wonder Jack Straw wants to forget all about the cabinet discussion of the legality of the Iraq war that took place three days before it started.

Documents disclosed by the Iraq inquiry today show that the attorney general thought he might tell the cabinet that "the legal issues were finely balanced". Straw talked him out of it. Straw then tried to cover up the lack of discussion at that cabinet meeting.

I'm not sure that Straw could have come out of today's evidence much worse. Despite his evidence last week, he seems to have been gung-ho on the war from the outset and the Foreign Office's chief legal adviser, Sir Michael Wood, kept having to pull him back. Straw eventually got fed up with this and rejected Wood's advice outright.

(snip)

Last year, the information tribunal ordered the government to release the minutes of the cabinet meetings of 13 and 17 March but Straw – for the first time ever – used the veto that he had himself put in the freedom of act to block publication. It had emerged during the tribunal hearing that there was considered to be insufficient discussion of the legal issues at the second meeting. It has since been admitted during the inquiry that all that happened at that meeting was that Goldsmith's very short legal advice was tabled and that a request by Clare Short for a discussion was rejected by the majority of the cabinet.

(snip)

When Straw blocked the release of the cabinet minutes, I wrote here of the problem of using arguments about cabinet confidentiality and collective cabinet responsibility to obscure an apparent failure of cabinet collective decision-making. It now appears that Straw himself engineered that failure. The cabinet backed the war unaware that the legal issues were finely balanced. That is a scandal that can be firmly laid at Straw's door.

(end snips)

The Iraq War was illegal. We did it anyway. The coalition of the criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. More at Sky News: Trouble for Goldsmith and Straw
http://blogs.news.sky.com/boultonandco/Post:e5c17dad-c2a7-48c3-a97c-1939cb12c178

Today the Iraq Inquiry focused on the legality of the Iraq war- and neither the former Attorney General Lord Goldsmith nor the Former Foreign Secretary Jack Straw came out of the day well.

Two former senior legal advisers at the Foreign Office launched attacks on Jack Straw.

Sir Michael Wood, who was Senior Legal Adviser at the FCO back in 2003, said he repeatedly told his then boss Mr Straw that, in his opinion, attacking Iraq without a second UN Resolution would be unlawful.

Mr Straw told him he disagreed, and added that he had ignored legal advice before and gone on to win his case in court.

Sir Michael's former deputy, Elizabeth Wilmshurst, who resigned after her legal advice that war would be illegal was ignored, also laid into the former Foreign Secretary.

She said that every FCO lawyer thought the war would be illegal without a second UN Resolution, but their professional opinions, like her's, were over-ridden.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Iraq should sue for reparations! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. AP finally covering this
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/01/26/world/main6143602.shtml

AP) A former legal adviser to the Britain's Foreign Office told the country's Iraq inquiry Tuesday that the government ignored his warning that invading Iraq would be illegal.

Another government lawyer, who resigned in protest at the invasion, said every legal officer in the department shared the opinion it was against international law.

Michael Wood - who was chief legal adviser to the Foreign Office at the time of the 2003 invasion - said he believed the use of force against Iraq was not authorized by the U.N. Security Council.

"I considered that the use of force against Iraq in March 2003 was contrary to international law," Wood said in a written statement to the inquiry. "In my opinion, that use of force had not been authorized by the Security Council, and had no other basis in international law."

Wood said then-Foreign Secretary Jack Straw ignored his advice.

(end snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Time for the war crimes trials to begin
I am really loving the inquiry in Britain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick once for the evening.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC