Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HOSE Newt DOWN, he's on FIRE! Writes new "Contract," labels Dems 'Secular Socialist Coalition'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:56 PM
Original message
HOSE Newt DOWN, he's on FIRE! Writes new "Contract," labels Dems 'Secular Socialist Coalition'
Oh, that NEWT. He's jes a' gonna fix evvaTHANG.

:rofl:

Newt Gingrich Writes New 'Contract,' Calls Dems 'Secular Socialist Coalition'

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/01/25/newt-gingrich-writes-new-contract-with-america/

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich led Republicans' 1994 take-over of the House of Representatives with the "Contract with America," a document telling voters what a Republican-led Congress would look like under his leadership.

On the same day that PD's Matt Lewis drafted his own proposal for a Contract with America 2.0, Gingrich has outlined an updated contract for Newsmax Magazine, along with instructions for today's Republican leadership, titled "How I'd Create a New Contract with America."

Before he gets to the meat of his proposal, however, Gingrich notes, "It is clear that the country is increasingly angry with the Obama-Pelosi-Reid team. But it is equally clear that Americans still distrust Republicans almost as much as they fear liberal Democrats."

This document, he says, can help energize Republicans, who should focus on the country, rather than fixating on Democrats, whom he refers to as a "secular socialist coalition seeking to change America radically." Gingrich then gives the history of the first contract, as well as a lengthy how-to guide for Republicans to use his new one.

Finally, Gingrich outlines an extensive list of priorities he'd like to see Republicans tackle:

1. Jobs, jobs, jobs.
2. Balance the budget.
3. An American energy plan.
4. Appropriations reform.
5. Litigation reform.
6. Real health reform.
7. Every child gets ahead.
8. Protect religious liberty.
9. Protect Americans, not the rights of terrorists.
10. Defending America is job one for government.

Although House Minority Leader John Boehner and Republican Whip Eric Cantor have said for months that they will unveil a similar Republican agenda, they have yet to do so. But they will have plenty of time to discuss Gingrich's and Lewis's ideas at the Republican issues conference, set for Baltimore later this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. hell, the teabaggers are gonna love his shit all over again....stupid is as stupid votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xolodno Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 10. Defending America is job one for government.
Then why is it number 10?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pretty funny
since his is everything that they resist to do and everything that they caused it to be in thye shithole we are now in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. They had a solid decade of complete control to implement those policies
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 01:10 PM by Winterblues
and yet nada...squat...nothing..nothing but hot air and LIES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. +1 (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh dear God he's gone off the deep end.
A new Contract on America? Seriously? Newt, this is old news. People fell for it once. They're not going to again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Jobs, jobs, jobs"
McDonalds, Burger King, Wendy's?

"Balance the Budget"

Bwhahahahaha :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Every child gets ahead"?
Of whom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's have a look at these ten, shall we?
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 02:07 PM by KansDem
1. Jobs, jobs, jobs.—the GOP loses jobs, remember W? You don't have the experience or savvy to actually create jobs...
2. Balance the budget.—Hahaha!!! Sure thing, just like you balanced it under 12 years of GOP rule (1994-2006)
3. An American energy plan.—WTF? Since when, Newt? You better talk to the oil corporations—they’re “people” now.
4. Appropriations reform. WTF? So the red states who get more back from the feds than they pay in federal taxes, will have to pull their own weight?
5. Litigation reform.—i.e., emasculate trial lawyers so your corporate buddies can continue to rape and pillage? Sure thing, Newt!
6. Real health reform.—You had the White House, both houses of Congress, the Supreme Court and most of the media from 2000 to 2006 and did nothing about this. Why now?
7. Every child gets ahead.—Hahaha!!! Care to explain what "gets ahead" means to you?
8. Protect religious liberty.—Oh, yeah, like the religiously insane are soooo put upon.
9. Protect Americans, not the rights of terrorists.—How about “American terrorists, Newt? Like the "teabaggers" and their not-so-veiled threats to allow them to win or they start shooting?
10. Defending America is job one for government.—Tell it you your pal, George W, who sat and did nothing when told 3,000 Americans were being murdered by his pals and business partners.

:rofl: Fuck off, Newt!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. +1000! This deserves to be an OP! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. minor quibble...
We did have a balanced budget (surplus) at the end of Clinton's term. Of course, Newt stepped down in 1998, so I don't think he or his henchmen can take too much credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Gigadittoes. Make this an OP, Kansas dem - it totally rocks
Because it tells the truth. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. "3. An American energy plan" : a.k.a. DRILL, BABY, DRILL!
Could they be any more fucking transparent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. We can laugh, but that a *lot* of voters swallow that shit -no matter how many times
they hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. The party of the 1st part shall be known in this contract as the party of the 1st part
He's a fat, ethically-challenged, attention-seeking, porcine hypocrite, an adulterer, a liar, and was booted out of Congress because even THEY couldn't put up with his crap. That's really low!

He lost Jesus, found Jesus, relocated to a new Jesus...he doesn't stop slithering around long enough to nail him down on the "meat" of anything. I remember sane, intelligent, conservative GOP candidates in decades past - aren't there any left at ALL?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder if Gingrich's contract includes serving your wife with divorce papers
as she lays in a hospital bed fighting cancer? Or maybe it includes your church having to pay your aforementioned cancer-stricken wife's electric bills because you abandoned her as she lay gravely ill in a hospital bed to take up with your secretary?


In April of 1980, the candidate who had promised to "keep his family together" told his wife he was filing for divorce. According to sources in whom Gingrich confided at the time, he was already having an affair with the woman he later married.
...
To make matters worse, Jackie had undergone surgery for cancer of the uterus during the 1978 campaign, a fact Gingrich was not loath to use in conversations or speeches that year. After the separation in 1980, she had to be operated on again, to remove another tumor While she was still in the hospital, according to Howell, "Newt came up there with his yellow legal pad, and he had a list of things on how the divorce was going to be handled. He wanted her to sign it. She was still recovering from surgery, still sort of out of it, and he comes in with a yellow sheet of paper, handwritten, and wants her to sign it.
...
People in Carrollton were particularly incensed by the fact that Jackie was left in difficult financial straits during the separation, after her surgery. According to Lee Howell, friends in her congregation had to raise money to help her and the children make ends meet, and Jackie finally had to go to court for adequate support, before the divorce decree. In his financial statement, Gingrich reported providing only $400 a month, plus $40 in allowances for his daughters. He claimed not to be able to afford any more. But in citing his own expenses, Gingrich listed $400 just for "Food/dry cleaning, etc."--for one person. The judge quickly ordered him to provide considerably more. When an article on the hearing appeared in the local paper, many in town were incensed. On election day, a few weeks later, Gingrich's winning margin in Carroll County fell from 66 percent in 1978 to 51 percent.

In part because of the divorce, in part because of the way he dealt with others, Gingrich has left behind him a string of disillusioned friends and associates, many of whom are now willing to air their feelings. Listen, for instance, to Lee Howell, who is still friendly with Gingrich: "Newt Gingrich has a tendency to chew people up and spit them out. He uses you for all it's worth, and when he doesn't need you anymore he throws you away. Very candidly, I don't think that Newt Gingrich has many principles, except for what's best for him, guiding him."
...
"The important thing you have to understand about Newt Gingrich is that he is amoral," says Carter. "There isn't any right or wrong, there isn't any conservative or liberal. There's only what will work best for Newt Gingrich.


more here.... http://motherjones.com/politics/1984/11/newt-gingrich-shining-knight-post-reagan-right





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Yeah, Newts pretty lax when it comes to Marraige Contracts...
...what wife is he cheating on now? Third? Fourth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Some real weasely language there
Let's see if we can do a little translating:

1. Jobs, jobs, jobs = tax cuts for corporations.

2. Balance the budget = kill Social Security and Medicare.

3. An American energy plan = Drill, baby, drill!

5. Litigation reform = tort reform, i.e., caps on damages against large corporations and no class action lawsuits.

8. Protect religious liberty = allow fundies to hate gays and deny morning-after contraception to rape victims.

9. Protect Americans, not the rights of terrorists = trash the bill of rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Secular Socialist Coalition -- I'd vote for that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. 'Secular Socialist Coalition'= Godless Commies. How original.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. This always happens before Newt dumps a wife, and elopes with a secretary
So you definitely have to figure in the 'republicon family values' element to the this strategery...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. I did call on the New Contract oh but a week ago
my, my...

I wish the people in DC were as good as readying the damn tea leaves, but I think they simply don't want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Secular Socialist Coalition! Dayyum, that's catchy! Straight to the point!
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 02:33 PM by eppur_se_muova
Get me a tee with that on it, and print me up an Official Membership Certificate!

Now find me a candidate who ... awww, F***!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Do we still get our orders directly from the Kremlin?
Or is it Caracas these days? Pyongyang?


Tell me, dammit! How can I slavishly obey orders from my masters if I don't know which language they're in?!?!?







(and for the deadbolts who can't tell: :sarcasm: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Caracas Hermano, de plano Caracas
:-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Crap! I took French in HS and Japanese in college...
...Looks like I'm gonna be late for the Party again.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I'm thinking of picking up Chinese myslf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. They never kept the last Contract On America
And that's no typo in the subject line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. They had zero concern about jobs, budget, and energy for a decade
I'm sure the media will be blasting how great this is until November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
30. Jobs, Jobs, Jobs
When it's Newt talking, you can be sure they're of the hand, blow, and rim variety. (So he can "honestly" claim to have never slept with her (whoever the "her" du jour is).)
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
31. Logical inconsistency, anyone? 10. Defending America is job one for government.
10. Defending America is job one for government.

So, is it the number 1 priority or number 10?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
32. Fundamentalist Fascist Coalition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC