Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm worried about Social Security.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 03:58 PM
Original message
I'm worried about Social Security.
Do you think he's going to attempt to downsize the program somehow? Please tell me he won't even consider that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope not... but, I wouldn't Be Surprised
he touches that, and you can kiss the Democratic Party goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope not, but it wouldn't surprise me at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. "He?"
"Evil!"


:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. He talked about raising the cap when I saw him before the 08 election.
It is the only sensible option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Agree 100%.
Just raise or even eliminate the cap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. The cap needs to be raised or eliminated but further raising the
retirement age for fulll benefits those entering the workforce now (not those nearing retirement) would also be prudent. When Social Security was adopted the life expenctancy was 61.7 years (both sexes all races). For 2010 the equivalent figure is 78.3 years.

Looking at life expentancy at birth only tells part of the picture. It is somewhat distorted by changes in infant mortality. The change is less dramatic when you look only at life expectency after attaining adulthood or life expectancy after "normal" retirement age.

In 1940 a person who was 65 could expect to live approximately another 13 years. That has now risen to 19 years. Changes in health and life expectancy justify a gradual change in retirement age to 70 with an option for early retirement at reduced benefits at age 67.

Full disclosure here: I retired at 55 but don't plan on making an early claim for Social Security. My spouse retired at 57 and began drawing reduced benefits at 63. My father began drawing benefits at age 65, worked until age 93 in his own CPA practice and died two weeks before his 102nd birthday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. You will have to be 90 before you can start collecting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think he wanted to, but not getting that deficit committee passed hurt that
That deficit committee was a means to shield both Congress and Obama from the full wrath of the people in slashing both SS and Medicare.

Without that passing its likely dead.

At least I hope its dead.

On the other hand, the government can continue playing with bogus CPI numbers to claim theres no inflation (like they did for 2010 and talking about already for 2011), which effectively results in a freeze on benefits without any way to point fingers at any politicians.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. You will get the SS you were promised...They just never promised what it would buy...
COLA could never keep up with rapid changes, and that is how they will smoke out the SS, Medicaid and the Debt..... Inflate it away.

Do you realize that the FED printed, or made up, over 90% of the money we borrowed in 2009??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paranoid Pessimist Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. You Should Be Worried
I am. I'm about to retire and I think it is not impossible that The Powers That Be (including its spokesperson, the president) will claim to have no economic choice but to scuttle Social Security, and the institutions, both public and private, will reneg on pensions, again saying they have no choice. Old people aren't much good at rioting and storming the bastille, so we'll just whine and die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Pensions are already broke. Nationally, there exists a $1T deficit.
I would seriously not count on pensions or defined benefit plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. More worried about Medicare. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. So am I
When Social Security and Medicare are angrily referred to as 'entitlement programs' - as they have been all day on MSNBC - you can tell that the powers that be aren't just satisfied with sucking us dry in our working years. Now they're going to suck retirees dry, too.

If they take ONE DIME away from either program, they'd better damn well reduce our imperialistic military outposts and bloated Pentagon budget first.

I don't like where this is headed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. that's not the way it works - the "entitlement" programs need to be cut to
insure continued funding for hundreds of military institutions around the world and the obscenely expensive weapons systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Political suicide if anyone does.
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 04:21 PM by TheCowsCameHome
It's like kissing the third rail..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC