Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are Okeefe and gang looking at hard time?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 05:34 PM
Original message
Are Okeefe and gang looking at hard time?
Is this a 'slap on the wrist' crime or are they looking at serious sentences?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. If they were young and black with no money it would be serious.
Or if they were brown or white or any of the other colors for that matter.

These guys come from the privileged color, green.

I would be surprised if they do a day of real time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Warergate plumbers went to jail
but that was the 1970s. There was a breakin there, but I assume this broke the law as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. the fact that it was Fed building make it worse ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Good point - the Watergate was just an appartment complex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11cents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Max of 10 years and a $250,000 fine, is what I read.
That's the theory. I bet the reality will be: with daddy's help our favorite pimp pleads to a misdemeanor.

Still, they had to appear in court today in their little red jumpsuits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Out of Daddy's jurisdiction and it's a federal rap
Ten years mandatory minimum.

No parole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. What they did was a felony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, but the lad is just confused. He's from a good family.
This is his first try at wiretapping (although I do suggest other members of Congress check their phones). He's a good lad.

You know the drill. If they're white, Christian, male and Republican, you can pretty much bank on a slap on the wrist. I don't know how rich his daddy is, but if there are some deep pockets, he'll get a very light slap on the wrist.

Now if he'd been a leftist trying to tap some conservative's phone, they'd throw the book at him no matter what. You know how dangerous we lefties are to the power elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Although I'd love to see them do time...
Edited on Tue Jan-26-10 07:00 PM by ljm2002
...more importantly, I'd like to see -- or have someone see -- the raw, unedited tapes. It would be very informative to know just how many edits were made and where. If that was publicized it could help in the future when someone tries to make a first strike like this -- help people to understand that nowadays, with the ability to edit stuff so easily, what you see on tape cannot always be trusted.

(ON EDIT: Oops, I see now that he was arrested for a new crime. Cool!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. In theory, yes.
In reality, they won't serve a day. I doubt they even get charged with anything more than a misdemeanor.

Strings will be pulled, hands will be shaken, justice will be laughed at again for only being for poor people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. too bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-26-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hope so...it is no small prank to attempt to wiretap a US Senator's phones
Landrieu would have access to classified information and who knows what she might discuss on her office phones that is classified? That is a pretty serious thing and I would hope it is treated as such by authorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC