Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Testy Conflict With Goldman Helped Push A.I.G. to Edge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 01:20 PM
Original message
Testy Conflict With Goldman Helped Push A.I.G. to Edge
<snip>

Billions of dollars were at stake when 21 executives of Goldman Sachs and the American International Group convened a conference call on Jan. 28, 2008, to try to resolve a rancorous dispute that had been escalating for months.

A.I.G. had long insured complex mortgage securities owned by Goldman and other firms against possible defaults. With the housing crisis deepening, A.I.G., once the world’s biggest insurer, had already paid Goldman $2 billion to cover losses the bank said it might suffer.

A.I.G. executives wanted some of its money back, insisting that Goldman — like a homeowner overestimating the damages in a storm to get a bigger insurance payment — had inflated the potential losses. Goldman countered that it was owed even more, while also resisting consulting with third parties to help estimate a value for the securities.

After more than an hour of debate, the two sides on the call signed off with nothing settled, according to internal A.I.G. documents and an audio recording reviewed by The New York Times.

Behind-the-scenes disputes over huge sums are common in banking, but the standoff between A.I.G. and Goldman would become one of the most momentous in Wall Street history. Well before the federal government bailed out A.I.G. in September 2008, Goldman’s demands for billions of dollars from the insurer helped put it in a precarious financial position by bleeding much-needed cash. That ultimately provoked the government to step in.

With taxpayer assistance to A.I.G. currently totaling $180 billion, regulatory and Congressional scrutiny of Goldman’s role in the insurer’s downfall is increasing. The Securities and Exchange Commission is examining the payment demands that a number of firms — most prominently Goldman — made during 2007 and 2008 as the mortgage market imploded.

<end of snip>

much more at link: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/business/07goldman.html?th=&emc=th&pagewanted=print

Goldman Sachs as a corporate motto. That motto is, "the one with the most toys wins!" Considering Goldman Sachs has been around for more than a 100 years and has more than one international economic downfall in it's resume, it is time this pig of a company is dismantled and all of the people in-charge are sent to jail conspiracy, fraud, infringement of national security, etc... This group of corporate clowns broke the economy deserve the best our penitentiary system has to offer, down with Goldman Sachs, up with the common man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Self-serving K & R
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Let me help a bit too
;)

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why can't we get this investigated?
Do we not have a right to know where our money went??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick up to the top
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Goldman CEO aka Treasury Secretary Paulson decided to let Lehman fail
using the moral hazard excuse. Putting a huge amount of pressure on AIG and the entire financial system.

Goldman certainly made out ok, right. They are borrowing billions of our dollars at a near zero interest rate and investing (risking, gambling) it. It is outright theft of our tax dollars. If their bets lose, they lose nothing, only the American people lose. Quite a gig they got going there, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Now, Now, even Obama felt that "Hank was working hard"
On the crisis.

Don't you realize the sleepless nights the poor Hankie boy has had, wondering if his bets for AIG-Goldman Sachs and against Lehman would be overlooked?

Lucky for him, this is an era wherein NO CONFLICT of interest gains too much attention from our lawmakers -as they are all in the game together.

Di Feinstein went so far as to have the Senate ethics rules re-written. Thus, according to the new frame offered the lawmakers - as long as any legitimate reason exists to vote for a piece of legislation, other than the money coming to your family from your vote, all is well.

Thus she could vote for the Iraqi War Resolution, and let her husband set up 27 million bucks in deals from government contracts involved with our War Effort, and not worry that she was going to hear about a conflict of interest.

She also appointed as the Oversight of Ethics Lead Guy a person who always does her biding.

We really need to get rid of everyone in office, save a very small group.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick for the Monday crowd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC