Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Going back to an economy where one can expect a lifelong employment after seven years of school ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
howard112211 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:55 AM
Original message
Going back to an economy where one can expect a lifelong employment after seven years of school ...
...simply ain't gonna happen. I know we all like to idealize those "good old days" where one got married at the age of sixteen
and went to work in the same steel mill as dad.

Those days are gone and they are not going back. Even if we boycott all foreign products (stupid idea and the USA would be third world within ten years if we did) this will not bring those days back.

Better to brace oneself for the inevitable future: Pump a lot of tax money into the education system. Get rid of all college tuitions.
Encourage kids to get trained in some high-tech field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. and then watch those jobs disappear when indians or chinese students learn the same stuff
no idea what the solution is going to be but its better to be a jack of all trades than master at one it seems...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. We need trade policies that protect our industries.
Lots of countries have them like India and China.

Without policies that protect our industries what is to stop the job drain?

Who would have ever thunk it??


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belpejic Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
44. I fear that standards of living in the US are falling so fast
That rough parity will be the reality sooner than we might think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. there were no good old days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Disagree. I have older relatives that made a good life for themselves
in blue-collar factory jobs, one income, pension, etc. Those days are indeed over, but they did exist for a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. all my grandparents-they were union members-surprise,surprise
all had homes and sent their kids to college
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes--it wasn't our imaginations, people really could live a middle-class life
with a high-school diploma, up until the 70's/80's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Place still mattered at that time
It increasingly hasn't since, for a number of reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Except those tech jobs aren't immune either.
Cheap-labor Republicans and neo-libs, equipped with their pie-in-the-stratosphere theories (which always fall flat on their face when a dollop of reality is applied), screwed this economy for the short AND long term. Joe Sixpack ain't re-training or inventing his way outta this mess.

Too many entrepreneurs fail or cannot even get started because this country has no universal health care, college simply costs way too damned much money, we're not replacing the outgoing career fields with anything solid and the same people that instituted this loser system are still firmly in charge of this mess.

When you were a kid and you tried to complete a task, did you try doing the same thing that failed you over and over and over and over again, hoping you'd get the result you wanted if you just kept TRYING? Well, really, maybe that logic doesn't apply here; for it assumes that the ones in charge of baking the Friedman Frosted Shitcake actually care about the needs and outcomes of the workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howard112211 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. True. Today one gets a PhD and afterwards works one two-year temporary position after another.
Sucky times indeed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. i guess it depends on the PhD, i know people who got degrees up the ying yang in total useless crap
unless you happen to be the guy teaching it, it might be nice to have but a paycheck might be more worthwhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. We know a number of laid-off PhD's...
a year ago my husband's employer wiped out R&D--they were the first to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Poorly managed , rather non-manged free trade contributed greatly
to this situation of joblessness. We are well on the
way of Zimbabwe if the U.S. does not do something about
trade policy.

Making the decision to have the U.S. a Service Economy
was a mistake. We must return the US to having Mfg
as 15 to 20% of GDP. '''G. Immelt, GE

We must develop an Industrial Policy for the U.S.
The Largest Country in the Developed World and no
Industrial Policy--Sherrod Brown, D. Ohio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Then We May As Well All Commit Mass Suicide Right Now
Edited on Tue Feb-09-10 10:20 AM by NashVegas
because 70% or more are nothing more than food for the grinder of the other 30. sweep your own fucking chimney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. Agreed, life-long learning & constant innovation
are the keys to the knowledge economy. The Industrial Age is dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. When businesses say we must have a mfg base or we are dead.
This life-long learning has been the Centrist Mantra.

Yes Education is important. Education is a long term
solution. In the meantime, what do we do.

Our country is too highly populated. There can never
be enough jobs relative to our numbers of people unless
you have a variety of jobs. We have been operating on
Life long learning since the Clinton Administration.

Mfg is necessary for National Security. Buying our arms
from our adversaries is going to be real smart.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Manufacturing is over. Anyone can do that, & they are.
Amazing that the first thing you think of, is making guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yes, education, obviously ...
But there are some other long-standing means of earning a living that do go back to "the good old days" and are (perhaps) still viable. I'm speaking of what my grandparents and generation after generation of immigrants to this country have done, and still do today: start a business. My Hungarian grandparents started a small corner grocery; my grandmother made sausage in the back to sell. My Russian/Polish grandparents started a junkyard that grew into a small auto-parts business. Both families were able to send their children to college. There are immigrants who every day open small restaurants or dry-cleaning businesses, etc. Others started by manufacturing a small thing like nails or picture hooks and grew.

I realize that this is harder to do in some areas than others. Large urban environments still allow for storefront businesses to exist. In suburbia it's more difficult. But here's what I'm thinking. In this culture in which there are no longer any small, independent pharmacies and fewer and fewer corner hardware stores, everything has been consolidated and super-sized. People shop at the big box stores, or increasingly, from the Internet. As much as we are starting as a culture to emphasize buying locally in terms of our food ... we should be trying to have a similar cultural movement that encourages us to shop and eat locally: from small businesses and restaurants that are not chains.

I'll probably be scoffed at for harboring such limited, retro notions that involve damned hard work and not as much compensation perhaps. But they do offer other benefits, such as pride of community and individual attention. All is not lost to those who have fallen through the educational cracks: my grandparents did it barely speaking the language and with 8th-grade educations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belpejic Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
49. I couldn't agree with you more.
But I just don't know how to shift people's awareness. People want things right away, and most still think that getting the best deal, price-wise, is the best way to go. But the whole manufacturing paradigm has shifted--when you buy the lowest-priced goods, you're essentially rewarding China, not the US. You're shooting yourself in the foot, unless you're in the upper echelon reaches of income brackets in the US. I hated "Buy US" rhetoric back in the 80s--I thought it was provincial and short-sighted--but now that globalization has become a reality I wonder why more people aren't selling the fact that local means better quality and better conditions for all.

Why can't we start a "Buy US" movement all over again, this time for the right reasons? For example, if I were in the market for a car, I would choose a Ford Focus over a comparable Toyota, Honda, or Hyundai unless the latter could overwhelmingly prove me wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. I got the answer....?!?!?!
We all become bankers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. Then why has China done so well with protectionist measures?
We allow all our productiuon go, and say that is the way of the world. NOT. OIt is what we, or should I say Reagan chose. And to not choose to remedy it, is to wind up with China blowing our asses off the planet. We cant make SHIT. I am a moldmaker, and they have been killing us since the seventies. If we dont start making things we can stack, we are thru.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. You mean China where GM is the fastest growing car brand
Or China where they manufacture about 2/3 the amount of value that we do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. The world has seen how hollow the washington consensus is.
Edited on Tue Feb-09-10 01:31 PM by Gman2
They are quickly seeing the utility of planned production schedules. Organizing the future works at least as well as adhoc willy nilly.

The future is called the Beijing consensus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. and this is relevant to.......?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. The assertion that protectionism always leads to disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. UH...OK....how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Just like I said. Globalism has a black eye, and the Beijing consensus rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. Globalism is doing just fine.
And it involves the globe, not Beijing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. What the hell are you saying?
Black eye about what? What "rules"? What data do you base this on? China imports more as % of GDP than we do, including the US as their 3rd biggest trading partner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
51. The same China who imports a greater % of GDP than they US.
The same China who was imports rise 89% year over year?

Imports only make up 10% of US economy. Net imports (exports - imports) make up about 5%. Thats works out to $3000 per person.

Anyone you know who only bought $3000 worth of goods last year.

The idea that the US doesn't manufacture anything is so fucking stupid. It doesn't even stand up to 10 seconds of scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
16. Do you know what the unemployment rate is in Japan and South Korea right now?
Keep in mind they boycott the hell out of our products before you answer.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. A college degree doesn't mean shit these days
especially if you're not in the right field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howard112211 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. This is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. College/university is entry level now.
Same as high school used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. I would addd, fresh outta college, and up to date. After five years, youre washed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. That kind of economy hasn't existed in the USA at any time during my 30 years in the workforce
My dad served in World War II. He retired from the Navy in 1956.

He got hired promptly by an aerospace company, and worked there for his entire career. One job.

I'm currently working my eighth "permanent", full-time job since I finished my bachelor's at UC in 1980. There were also a few in-between consulting jobs, temp jobs, and in the earlier days some under-the-table construction work and other odd jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. EPIC FAIL.. if we refuse to allow people to lead a middle class lifestyle THAT will be when we end
up in the third world. We will NOT end up third world for refusing to play ball in the flat earth society of "free" (slave wage) trade. We can produce and consume everything we need right here in this country and live a first world lifestyle. All that "free" trade has done is impoverish this nation and its citizens for the last 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. and it undercuts poor people all over the world too
we dump cheap agricultural goods into their economy, making their own agricultural impossible for the small farmers, so they are forced off the land and into slums of large cities..where they are totally unprepared to live..

rich westerners "move in" and buy up the vacated lands for their fancy resorts and or "business" plans..IMF/World Bank "loans" crooked leaders shit loads of money to beef up infrastructure (needed by the gringo corporate buccaneers) and when the country cannot pay it off, chaos ensues..and then we "offer" military "help"..rinse & repeat..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
33. There aren't enough tech jobs out there for all of the graduates
What we need is less emphasis on college and more on vocational training/trades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Well then, enjoy the Third World.
You'll be there for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
34. What a load of elitist horsecrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. 7 years of education worked in the 19th century.
It doesn't in the 21st.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. 7 years of education works NOW.
In your fantasyland, do all of us have money trees in our backyards to PAY for these multiple and unnecessary trips to college? This ain't Europe we live in.

What do you say to people who aren't meant to GO to college for whatever reason? Do you just kill them, tell them to get smarter in the next life? Leave them behind to suffer in squalor?

The problem is WAGES, not knowledge. You need a living WAGE to survive in this country. Employers aren't willing to pay that. What results is a glut of degreed workers with fewer and fewer jobs for them.

Seems that you're really big on curt pie-in-the-sky talking points peppered with unempathetic snark. You don't seem to be the least bit grounded in reality in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. And there are guys just as (if not more) educated than you waiting for their H1-B.
Your diploma doesn't entitle you to anything more than the rest of us. It does not make you 'special'. It does not make you a better person. We *ALL* need jobs that pay a living wage, not just those who think their shit doesn't stink because of piece of paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
35. The number one job for the future
Farming.

Seriously.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
37. I am 40 years old and my generation NEVER saw that.
Edited on Tue Feb-09-10 06:50 PM by slampoet
Not actuaries,
Not engineers,
Not IT
Not even frikin doctors, lawyer, or even school teachers.


I only have ONE friend my age who has had the same job for a decade.


And he polishes Flintlocks, Swords, and Armor for a living and technically works for the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
42. I have had 6 jobs already and I am 34. My Dad has worked at the same job for almost 40 years.
Edited on Wed Feb-10-10 08:40 AM by Jennicut
Those days were gone a long, long time ago. Not that we should just sit back and accept it. I have been laid off 3 times and have left for pay cuts other times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Same here. Dad had the SAME job for 37 years.
In 23 years of working, I've had 4 jobs, one of them paying minimum wage while I put myself through school (this was in the late 80s-early 90s, where college grads couldn't get shiz on a stick thanks to the Reagan/Bewsh I recession). BARELY have the one I have now, via extreme luck and bullet-dodging.

I've been through three recessions. Some on this board have been through 4 or 5. Yeah, multiple recessions after boom/bubble/CRASH economic climates, each one worse than the last . . . speaks loud VOLUMES on the success of Friedman Economics, don't it? :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes:

Dad was able to retire with better than average benefits and SS. Also, while he was working, "Layoff" to him meant "idled with SOME pay, go back to work when the economy and demand picks back up", not "kicked to the curb, frog-marched by security indignantly, good luck on your future endeavors". In real dollars, I'm not making anywhere NEAR what he made at the same age. Mom and dad also weren't part of a two-earner household . . . until Reagan's second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. I am going back to school while I stay home with my kids.
Edited on Wed Feb-10-10 12:46 PM by Jennicut
Stayed at home with them and am about to do student teaching for preschool. It won't pay me much, being a preschool teacher, but it is usually in demand and at least working with kids makes me happy. And with 4 and 5 year olds, it fits in my schedule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. when I first started working,
I had 17 jobs that sent me W2s the first year outa highschool, I had a lot of other jobs that didn't. That was back in the late sixties. You know, before the generation that fought WW2 started dieing off and they had union jobs. Before unions became a curse word of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
46. I'm thankful that even in a recession my community values education
We just passed three tax levies for our schools. There does need to be something done about jobs and trade though. The best education does no good if there are no jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
48. Getting rid of tuitions would make the problem way worse
If you can't get lifelong work now, imagine how bad it would be with even more people with advanced degrees.


More educated people won't matter because the economic deck is already stacked against them. The supply DOESN't create it's own demand. We need to undo the damage done in the last 40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC