Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't Ask... Don't Tell

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:10 PM
Original message
Don't Ask... Don't Tell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh my God, I had no idea.
I'm so ashamed of my government right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Are you British?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I know he's British.
I'm American and I'm ashamed of my government because they have yet to do anything about DADT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oh, OK, thought you might be a Brit,
DADT is indeed shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Great minds think alike!
At least the Brits got over their bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. what if our gov't said this: "I'd like to free the slaves, but we must study it for a few years." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mighty Rec! He was more than worthy as a human just the way he was - but people with less smarts
than himself couldn't allow a man to be attracted to another man. These cretins of society that abhor Gays, Lesbians, and especially Transvestites, are the worst forms of creatures breathing. From the torture and killings from Hitler, to the pursuit of nuts in the USA to start criminalizing being Gay, to those in Uganda trying to put Gays all to death - they are the stain that needs to be stopped.



Three Cheers for Alan Turing's brilliance and help in stopping the Nazis!! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. my god.
I have no words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terra Alta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. those darn gays
they never contribute anything worthwhile to society. Inventing the computer? Outsmarting the Nazis? Blah, they all need to be CURED!:sarcasm:

In all seriousness, though -- it's things like this that make me ashamed to be an American. DADT is a disastrous policy that ruins lives... it should be overturned ASAP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WarKillsChildren Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Apple
He killed himself by eating an apple laced with cyanide. A bitten apple is the logo on the back of your ipod. Apple computers get it why can't the military?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. A Quick Google Search Reveals That the Apple Logo Is Not a Tribute To Turing
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 03:04 PM by Toasterlad
It's only an urban legend that the Apple logo had anything to do with Turing. And that's good news. Commemorating Turing's legacy by making a logo out of his suicide implement is in questionable taste at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kick for afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Don't ask, don't tell was not policy when he was in.
Don't ask, don't tell, was created during the Clinton Administration and it was a HUGE improvement over what went before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Given That Discharges Went UP After DADT Was Implemented, It's Safe to Conclude You're Full of Shit
DADT did not stop the unfair discharges of homosexuals, and it did not stop the harrassment they received. All it did was provide a new legal weapon to be used against gays, while still preventing them from speaking up in their own defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Before DADT people were court martialed and sent to prison
After DADT they were just discharged, but only if identified as gay. They no longer searched out and prosecuted gays. I would say that was an improvement but maybe you don't think so..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. The Military Generally Stopped Imprisoning Homosexuals Decades Before DADT
And both before AND after DADT, gays have been searched out and discharged. So no, I see no measurable improvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. It was useful then and is outdated now.
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 03:25 PM by Fearless
It did serve a purpose, protecting GLB people in the armed services - whether successful or not, I don't have evidence enough to decide. However, much has changed for the GLBTQ community since the 1990's. This nation has changed quite a bit in our favor. It's time for a program, which is shielding GLB people from harm to step aside and be replaced by equity for all American soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC