Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jobless Suffer as Corporate Cash Hits $1.18 Trillion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:39 AM
Original message
Jobless Suffer as Corporate Cash Hits $1.18 Trillion
Feb. 11 (Bloomberg) -- A majority of companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index increased cash to a combined $1.18 trillion while simultaneously reducing spending, keeping a jobs recovery on hold.

Caterpillar Inc., Eaton Corp., Walgreen Co. and General Electric Co. are among 256 companies that ended last quarter with $518 billion more cash than a year earlier after cutting capital spending by 43 percent. Economists say the dearth of investment is keeping the jobless rate at about 10 percent as the U.S. emerges from its worst recession since the 1930s.

“It’s not clear we are going to see the type of growth following this recession that we’ve seen in previous recessions,” Sandy Cutler, Eaton’s chief executive officer, said in an interview yesterday. That view “is leading people to be cautious as to their rate of reinvestment, and right in parallel with that, in terms of hiring additional employees.”

Investment and hiring may remain low as companies bring unused capacity back on line and rely on productivity gains to fill demand, said Edward Lazear, former economic adviser to President George W. Bush and a professor at Stanford University in Stanford, California. Employers have eliminated 8.4 million jobs since the U.S. slipped into recession in December 2007.

“About three years into the recovery, you start getting significant wage growth,” Lazear said in an interview. “It’s unfortunate because it means workers suffer for a pretty long time after the recovery takes off.”

~snip~
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a6kXsL1Q5FYc

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unbelievable. It really is fascism now.
I hate corporations, CEOs, and banksters. They, along with repukes, have ruined this world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. This is just sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well as the Banks refuse to make loans..........
Businesses will have to resort to financing their self

Wall St. Banks are Forcing the Double Dip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. The last skirmishes of class warfare are now being fought.
Just a simple mop-up operation at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. We haven't even started fighting back yet n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Looks like they foresee rough times.
I think they are reading the tea leaves correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alias Dictus Tyrant Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. The lack of investment is caused by uncertainty
Companies invest in jobs if they think there is a reasonable chance that it will be worth the money. There is so much uncertainty and shenanigans going on in economic policy that they don't know if a good investment in a thousand jobs today will be an albatross tomorrow because of some new policy. A lot of it is just a lack of clear leadership and policy on economic matters from the government that make it difficult to predict what policy will be next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Companies invest when Tax Incentives encourage GROWTH
Right now we only have Corporate Tax incentives that encourage Out-Sourcing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Even with incentives companies won't stop hoarding cash.
Having cash gives companies options.

In a recession companies will not hire people just because of incentives. What good is an incentive if you get caught in a cashflow trap and can't make bond payments = bankruptcy & liquidation.

Companies will hire and stop hoarding cash for one reason and one reason only: because they have to.

Because not doing so will be so horribly expensive (in terms of lost revenue/market-share/profits) that their fear of the future is less than their fear of competitor gaining on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Exactly!! the same trickledown BULLSHIT Reagan foisted on us
still going on..total BULLshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I've seen a few Dem Senators on CSpin making noise
about the FAILED policies of the RATpubliCONs but as of yet haven't seen any Real Reforms

I wish the DEMs would "Wake the Fuck Up" as this is some thing a LARGE Majority of Americans understand and can get behind with their Vote.

We need Meaningful Regulatory Reforms NOW and we need it like yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. more aggressive antitrust action needs to be taken.
smaller corporations actually have to compete and have less ability to act against the public interest.

the dude that owns the restaurant down the street from you is still capitalism, but he isn't walmart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Profits are too easy...
They should have to work harder for them. The system needs to be tilted back toward the workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. "Short Term Profits with Long Term Consequences"
This is what I've seen coming out of the Senate Banking Committee hearings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fuck CEOs, banks, big corporations and all those assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not surprising. Companies are conservative in bad times.
Not conservative as in Republicans but conservative in terms of not taking risk, not pushing the envelope.

If company thinks there is trouble on the horizon they will hoard cash.

Companies have debt obligations. Getting stuck in a cashflow squeeze as poor economy due to reduced revenue is a trap that is best avoided by having a fortress of cash.

In economics this is called "failure of the individual". Each individual company is doing what is the most likely to allow them to survive meanwhile the combined effect is what causes the situation that they are fearing.

This is why companies can't push themselves out of a recession on their own. It requires govt funding to create a cycle where increased demand requires increased hiring which causes increased demand which causes increased hiring..... etc.

The so called "stimulus" bill was mostly non-stimulative. It was a lot of untargeted spending with a fancy name. True stimulus needs to put a substantial number of people to work and increase revenue at the bottom (poorest people tend to spend 100% of their income).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. They blame US for not spending. Not firms for hoarding cash or banks for not lending
How about taxing their profits and huge incomes? Close loopholes, investigate and confiscate all the windfall profits and crimes? Not with corporatists owning both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Well taxes should go up BUT.
taxing profits isn't going to make companies spend less and hang onto more cash. If anything it will make them spend EVEN MORE less.

Personally I have cut back on spending despite being employed during the recession. Most people I know are doing the same thing.
It is just natural behavior in times of uncertainty to reduce spending. You can't tax that away.

That being said corp taxes should rise but it won't solve this problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. Fascist country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. That's what I call 'due diligence'

That is Capitalism the way it is supposed to be done.

That is what is wrong with Capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Where's Donald Rumsfeld's $2.3 Trillion?
On the golden BAD NEWS DUMP DAY of September 10, 2001:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kpWqdPMjmo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC