Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A possible way to stimulate the economy, tax returns before Christmans...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:50 PM
Original message
A possible way to stimulate the economy, tax returns before Christmans...
many retail firms depend on Christmas for yearly profits.

Set the tax return deadline to Oct. 1, so that people could get their tax return before the Christmas season. Oct 1 is when the U.S. governments fiscal year begins.

The idea came from my son in law. His family just celebrated Christmas when their tax return arrived.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Give every citizen $50k
If you're interested in some kind of stimulus WITHOUT a jobs program
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. That would also work. Or just give us a tax free year. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Except it really wouldn't work well at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. True, but it would STIMULATE. Something that the current stimulus...
package has failed to accomplish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. No, it may not stimulate at all
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 05:12 PM by Oregone
Dollar for dollar, it may actually result in a negative cash injection into the economy, depending entirely on how a desperate heterogeneous population decides to spend the money. If it goes to pay off debt or buy services that do not stimulate tangential sectors much (like online porn), it would fail miserably. You should note:



The government is much better off collecting more tax money (than less) and directly spending it on food stamps, infrastructure projects, and goods & service vouchers. Handing out personal or corporate tax cuts is pretty much zero sum, and it deprives the government of funds at the same time (that it could otherwise use effectively)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. At Christmas time most people would rush to their local stores...
and spend, spend, spend.

When my son in law visited Best Buy the place was packed with people spending their tax returns on big screen TVs and i phones.

Imagine how a really big Christmas season could stimulate manufacturing.

Online porn sites always amazed me. Plenty is available free. (Don't ask me how I know.) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. You mean TVs made in China?
Seriously, its not a great way to stimulate the economy. Yes, you need to employ salesmen and cover the transportation domestically, but thats it.

Allowing someone to buy a foreign TV if they choose may do little, but spending it on a domestic project that gives them a job (which pays them money they can buy TVs with) may be a bit of a better job. Domestic projects stimulate the workers (and where they spend the money), the suppliers of the materials (steel, concrete, rock, etc), the tool makers, the transportation industry the delivers the supplies, etc, into a big long chain outward.

This tax cut insanity has got to stop. Its not the cure for a shitty economy whatsoever, and can even be the poison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. We have serious problems with the infrastructure in this country...
I was hoping that the "shovel ready" programs would be underway by this time and major efforts would be under consideration to improve our infrastructure. From sewers to the power grid, we face major problems in the near future if we don't treat upgrading our infrastructure seriously.

We could upgrade our internet system to provide high speed access to rural areas of the country and move many internet dependent jobs from the city. People could work from home rather than causing congestion and traffic jams. I've known companies who have tried this and found it works.

I personally like the idea of high speed rail systems to reduce our reliance on freeway systems.

We need bold ideas and we also need a Congress that is willing to solve problems rather then fight like elementary students in a playground.

I believe Obama can provide the leadership but he has to stop listening to Reid and Pelosi. Their efforts to pass legislation such as heathcare reform has been a train wreck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. self delete (n/t)
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 04:58 PM by spin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. People don't "get" tax returns, they file them. They "get" refunds.
A pet peeve of mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Or how about suspending all tax refunds, and use that money to increase production/create jobs
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 05:00 PM by Oregone
Heh, just saying. Sometimes figuring out more ways to take money out of the government coffers so people can buy beer and online porn isn't the most effective way to get things done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The party that tried that would be political history. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I was being sarcastic. There are still political feasible ways to increase taxes for Keynesian stim
Raising the top marginal rate is one heck of one thats been done before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. If the Democrats try this and the economy doesn't improve...
we will have another Ronny Raygun in 3 years.

If it does work, Obama will have a second term.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. The Democrats will not fully support Keynesian stimulus anyway, so its nothing to worry about
While they are attempting to raise the top marginal rate, any new stimulus or jobs program will be heavily business friendly and bi-partisan, employing trickle down philosophy. Thats just the way it is.

A chunk of the first bill was tax cuts. Much of what was left was just used as a crutch to keep states functioning (which is necessary). Little was left to increase demand/production to baseline. An attempt to please everyone at once resulted in somewhat of a dulling, dollar for dollar, of the stimulus. Thats life.

Raising the top marginal rate is a good step for sound tax policy, but they need to be more aggressive about direct stimulus instead of supply-side stimulus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I feel the people we elect are bought and owned by the big...
multinational corporations.

This has disadvantages.

I feel politicians should be required to wear NASCAR uniforms with patches from the corporations that sponsor them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Big problem: Their shirts are not big enough
The writing would be fine print, and therefore useless, if you were to list all their owners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Maybe the bigger the corporation, the bigger the sticker. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:22 PM
Original message
You've brought up porn in two posts
Are really worried that people will spend their entire tax refund on online porn?

Seems like an odd thing to be worried about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. There was an article I saw regarding one of Bush's rebates...
Here is something on it:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/02/bush-porn/

The main industry that had growth correlating to the rebate was online porn.

The real lesson to be learned is that relying on people (or even rich people) to collectively enact an effective stimulus by handing them money and hoping they spend it well is a tad bit stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Our county sets the due date for property taxes as Dec 12
Then these Einsteins wonder why our area (with its 19% unemployment) cant support three major malls because consumers are too tapped out to spend on Xmas gifts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. And for people who have to pay in when they file?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Good point. I wonder how large a percentage of taxpayers...
have to pay in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. I have often thought the same thing! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. I would never be able to wait that long n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. Economy stimulation from buying plastic crap made by 9 yr old Chinese girls
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 05:44 PM by SoCalDem
will not solve our economic woes..

We need to TAX THE HELL out of the so-called US companies that MAKE their crap in slave-wage countries.

Make it cost them TOO much to have their factories off shore.. and TAX the hell out of the ones who "incorporate" offshore to avoid taxes..

and make the people making 300K & up pay at least 30%..and limit their deductions so they cannot write everything off & end up paying nothing..or next to nothing..

and eliminate home deductions for homes valued at more than 650K..and for 2nd homes altogether.

make minimum wage $12.00 hr

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I agree with much you've said. The problem is our elected officials in Congress...
Getting them to vote such ideas into law is impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC