Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Barack Obama a liberal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:05 AM
Original message
Poll question: Is Barack Obama a liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. If its liberal to be homophobic, then absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Other: Hell No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. I would call him a Progressive over Liberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. How do you define the difference? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. but doesn't a progressive support increased regulation in support of
liberal economic policies? Not sure Obama has really implemented anything along those lines.

A centrist at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. He is up against a Repug wall
Give him time. As the country grows more and more disgusted at the Repugs stifling of our President, those reforms and regulations will come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. Progressive is the neo term for liberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. No it's not. It's a word for "new" Democrats who are ashamed of the Party's legacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Oh horse pucky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. If they didn't consider the term "liberal" damaged, there'd be no need to run from it.
QED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. The term has been damaged by the right
Who made it a lightening rod. Bush I called it, 'The L word,' equating it with the 'F' word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. So you ultimately agree with me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
52. Yes
Edited on Thu Feb-18-10 01:00 PM by niceypoo
Not sure if 'shame' is the right word though. I would say the word has been tainted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #24
42. If it's good enough for the Congressional Progressive Caucus ...
...it's good enough for me.

But I do usually describe myself as a liberal because I don't want there to be any ambiguity with those not politically well informed. Also I don't accept the fact that the Repugs have permanently scarred the term, and I want to do my part to bring it back to respectability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. It's an anachronism, like the "Colored" in NAACP.
The word hadn't been so triangulated in 1991 when the CPC was formed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
46. I think progressive is the neo term for Democrat.
During the Dean campaign for the WH I noticed that his supporters were all using the term progressive. I asked repeatedly (from a policy and political perspective) what it meant. No one could ever answer. No one could ever articulate a policy position that was different or new. I was not arguing a position - I just wanted to understand the "word".

During the last primary I finally got my answer - from a teacher. I met him originally during the Dean campaign. I had asked him back then about the term progressive. He said he just liked the term better but could not give a reason.

He came up to me during the last primary and said he had been thinking through the terms for four years and admitted that the term liberal just carried too much shame and that younger citizens knew that "because it was in their textbooks". (The textbooks written by rightwing religious nuts in Texas). Oh the SHAME, the SHAME.

He thought it was time to re-own "LIBERAL" because it actually suggests real political and policy positions and progressive doesn't really mean anything. I told him I had always self-described as a liberal, never once used the term progressive, and he was singing to the choir but welcome aboard.

Its all about the SHAME. And, how can you have a real political movement if its shame based?

Signed - an old Liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. Is being opposed to gay marriage a "progressive" value?
More proof that the "progressive" label is nebulous bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
35. Progressive?? HORSESHIT.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
49. He's a New Democrat
For those who don't know, DLC detests progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm not even sure he KNOWS any liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. good observation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
41. lol, how right you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. He is a centrist with left leanings. Most of us on DU are to the left of Obama,
Hillary, Edwards and almost everyone who ran for the Presidency. In terms of intervention using the govt, Obama has shown left leanings. But he is more of a center-left type. Bayh is center right. The Rethugs are right, the teabaggers extreme right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. I agree with that assessment
Anybody who read his book ("Audacity of Hope") could clearly identify him as being more of a pragmatic centrist (with left leaning tendencies that haven't quite been realized yet). The thing is that, based on what he wrote in his book and his performance in office so far, he doesn't seem tied down to a particular ideology. Actually, I suppose you might consider him to be "post-ideological" (which has certainly made for some interesting developments/alliances) but whatever he is, although he definitely seems to be to the "right" of most of us here at DU, he's NOT a "Blue Dog" (or is certainly too much to the left for most of them), and he's certainly NOT anywhere close to what passes for "Republican" nowadays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. He always came off that way to me.
He always came off as near Bill Clinton or slightly to the left of Bill Clinton to me all during the primaries. Hillary was slightly to the right on some foreign policy issues but they were not that different. He is in between the progressives and the blue dogs. Which means he is left of center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. I thought he was a left leaning centrist.
Now I know he does not lean left except in speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Political Compass says "no".


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Doubt that economic quadrant is up-to-date as to the Prez--too far left.
The representation of that variabble likely reflects his stated positions rather than his actual governance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. did his hiring the people who caused our economic collapse give u a clue lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. That was the latest they had...
And you are probably right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
farmout rightarm Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. Actually, he's about as liberal as most Democrats are.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
17. Obama is nothing less than a disappointment to me... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. The answer is of course NOT. But I have to say, I'm just in SHOCK as

I just listened to his announcing a bipartisan commission that is nearly guaranteed to further screw up the working people.

People would be up in arms and probably out in the streets if this came from a Republican president.

I'm just INCREDULOUS at what is taking place. Also, lwcon, please see this thread (if you haven't read this article yet), it really says it all:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7732854

(This is probably THE most important article I've read in a long time.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. W. Bush was terrified of forcing GM into BK while bailing out AIG at 100%.
Barack Obama can get away with a lot more than a Republican ever could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
38. Only Nixon could go to China..
Only Obama could bankrupt GM..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. People answering absolutely not are as sensible as those conservatives who paint him as a marxist
It's just silly.

He's weak and kind of useless so far, but he is on the liberal side of the fence.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
25. What we really have here is a confirmation of fairly easy observation
About 2/3 of DU is left of Obama and thinks he should move to their POV. Most of the other 1/3 are OK where he is, and a tiny fraction might think he is too left. They are just using the nebulous term "liberal" as an indication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
26. Is he a Democrat?
Edited on Thu Feb-18-10 11:13 AM by QC
Lately I find myself wondering about that one more and more, as I read things like this: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703315004575073321297464274.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
33. Nope. He's a DLC Democrat.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
34. Liberal..????
Obama is to the right of traditional Conservatives, certainly on Economic Policy, and Economic Justice IS the biggest Social Issue in America today. Most, if not all, Social Issues ARE a subset of Economic Injustice.

Even on The Moral Plane, it is a hard sell to consider Obama a "Liberal".
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children."
---President Dwight Eisenhower


I have trouble even considering Obama, and his coalition of conservative "Blue Dogs/DLC, as "Democrats".

THIS is the "Democratic Party" I joined 42 years ago:
"In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America’s own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for our citizens."---FDR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Spoiler alert:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Dwight D. Eisenhower would be considered way to the left of the Rethug party of today.
Hence, Obama is what is considered a center left Democrat. Politics shifted rightward. The first President I voted for was Bill Clinton so from my perspective, Obama is not a conservative. Everyone shifted to the right. Funny how the RW freaks out because he wants a slight shift to the left. OMG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. The Democratic Party has "shifted rightward".
I haven't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Nor should you. Leftists are the only thing keeping this country from going off the total deep end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
53. this needs to have its own thread. crazy stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
43. I wonder what he would say if asked if he was a Capitalist?
When FDR was asked if he was a Capitalist, he said no.

I think Obama would say yes without hesitation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
47. Hell no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
48. Liberal, a bit - Progressive, no way in hell.
Edited on Thu Feb-18-10 12:36 PM by old mark
Very funny - I pissed off a RWer on a gun forum yesterday by telling him the awful truth-that Obama is considered by many Democrats to be a moderate-to-conservative, even a republican by some....I was threatened and told I had a lot of nerve to "reveal myself", and told that I should find another country in which to live. I responded that I was born here served in my country's military in time of war, and had no intent of going anywhere, and that the RW pinheads threatening violence against the left should "bring it".

The truth is, I sometimes believe Obama is what used to be called a Moderate republican...those guys think he is a communist. It is to laugh.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
50. No. He has publicly stated he's a New Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
51. no accident he praised Ronald Reagan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
557188 Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
54. Liberal is a right wing term!
We are forced to call it Classical Liberal in the Academia because of America's constant misuse of the word.

Obama is a classical Liberal. Those are BAD children.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC