|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 09:37 AM Original message |
Toyota is going to be fucked for some time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingOfLostSouls (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. I disagree. Aside from the current problem, they make dependable quality cars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 09:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. They have created the perception of a dependable quality car |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Exactly!! And they haven't been reporting this particular issue since at least 1999. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. That's why I was saying around 20%... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
20. They've lost me forever. And we bought a Sienna last April. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:00 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I suppose a lot of people feel that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
30. LOL. Aside from occasionally being hurtling death machines, they are dependable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
3. It's a bad thing for sure. I have a 2005 Rav4 (not recalled)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Actually, I'd be MORE afraid if my Toyota WASN'T recalled at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:10 AM Response to Reply #12 |
24. 2001 thru 2005 RAV4 was virtually a different car from the later models. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:12 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. That's not the material fact. Does it have an electronic throttle or not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:56 AM Response to Reply #25 |
37. How am I speaking like an expert? I have a Toyota. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 12:25 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. The 2005 Rav 4 has an electronic throttle system, just like the recalled vehicles do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. LOL. Hurt myself on that one! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. ROFL!!!! Love the crash test dummy! :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vogon_Glory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. An Entertaining R/wingnut Theory Concerning Toyota |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. So they think there shouldn't be regulations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. I've heard the same theory from several anti-union DUers. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 12:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
38. And another right wing theory... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
9. I made the mistake of trying that in my 73 Centurian (455 4bbl) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebenaube (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #9 |
19. sorry... that could not have been a positrac if one wheel spun on ice. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:58 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. I wasn't going to say anything :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:15 AM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Um, yeah, it can be. It was a problem with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:23 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. I think you are thinking of limitied slip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:27 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Well, the bastard did eat rear tires. It is possible the thing was out of whack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
c brand (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
10. Ford less than one year ago was forced to recall more than 4 million cars based on 550 vehicle FIRES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:16 AM Response to Reply #10 |
27. More than 19 dead is a pretty significant death toll... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:17 AM Response to Reply #10 |
28. Toyota is the Tiger Woods of car companies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
16. Good. Then maybe folks will buy union-made US cars. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
17. I'm trying to figure out how low to let the stock go before I buy a shit-ton of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 10:46 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. That's exactly what I was thinking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:04 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Audi had similar issues during the 1980's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Similar problem, different company... Audi is mainly a niche |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #23 |
39. Audi has another problem that Toyota generally doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:20 AM Response to Reply #17 |
32. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
31. It wasn't flaming Pintos that dealt near-fatal blows to Ford |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #31 |
41. *You're* talking about it some 35 years later. Toyota = Crash for a generation or more. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Reminding about it, actually. Everybody else forgot and bought Fords for years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Nonsense. The Pinto is mentioned in every thread on this subject. Nobody has forgotten. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Joe Consumer bought lots of Fords after the Pinto, so why do some count Toyota out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 01:39 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. You're posing a bogus dichtomy--it's not all or nothing. But Toyota's image will suffer for years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:15 AM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Well, people didn't have a lot of choices either did they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
35. Which reminds me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 11:44 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. We used to do that on the two mile long lake behind our house... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-24-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. Nothing like it! better than sleigh riding! LOL nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC