Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Volcker Rule Being Deep-Sixed (just like every other economic "reform" the Admin. announces")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 06:43 PM
Original message
Volcker Rule Being Deep-Sixed (just like every other economic "reform" the Admin. announces")
As readers may recall, we had argued over a series of posts that the proposed Volcker rule, to bar proprietary trading at commercial banks, did not go far enough in reducing systemic risk. While the concept was so sketchy that it was difficult to be certain what it meant, it appeared to have two serious flaws.

(snip)

All these debates appear to be moot. The Volcker rule is following the tried and true path of all Obama “reforms”, meaning an idea announced with great fanfare is being whittled back to meaninglessness.

The media are differing a bit on the particulars of how the neutering operation came to pass, but the general direction appears clear. The New York Post appears first out with the story (before reader howl, the Post has broken some financial stories and the discerning FT Alphaville picked up on this one, hat tip Richard Smith):


“My understanding is the White House really does believe in it, but Treasury and the Hill do not, so it’s not going very far,” said one person close to the Treasury Department.

Added another source, “the White House is looking to save face” by backing a proposal with fewer restrictions. “The administration will spin the compromise as a way to add safety to proprietary trading,” a source said. “But this is a fundamentally different approach to regulation


Yves here. This is an intriguing reading of the dynamics. On the one hand, Timothy Geithner is so embattled that not only is he being interviewed in Vogue, but he takes a surprisingly defensive stance. Yet the Treasury engage in a turf war with the White House and wins. Or perhaps the climbdown is more a function of Congressional opposition (this change would require new legislation). The Senate Banking Committee made it abundantly clear it was not happy to see Team Obama retrading its financial reform bill at such a late juncture.

(more)
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/02/volcker-rule-being-deep-sixed.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds pathetic
no matter how they try to rationalize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, from a position of strength, Obama loses again.
With the vast majority of all the people in the entire nation calling for blood, demanding change, wanting strong and strict regulation to lock down wall street, supporting him in reigning in banks and investment houses, he gives in again. :(

:wtf:

Obama can never have a position so strong, a battle in which he is so mighty, a competition in which he has so overwhelmingly the greater power, that he can't throw it all away by being politically timid. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It becomes obvious that he does not WANT to do these things.
Sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
5.  and, as you mentioned, the Volcker rule didn't go nearly far enough,
and now it's further gutted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. The audicity of empty rhetoric...
This is most dissapointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC