Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bloomberg: WH may BAN Foreclosures Without HAMP Review via Exec. Order

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 07:15 AM
Original message
Bloomberg: WH may BAN Foreclosures Without HAMP Review via Exec. Order
Edited on Fri Feb-26-10 07:16 AM by FourScore
Obama May Prohibit Home-Loan Foreclosures Without HAMP Review
By Dawn Kopecki

Feb. 25 (Bloomberg) -- The Obama administration may expand efforts to ease the housing crisis by banning all foreclosures on home loans unless they have been screened and rejected by the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program.

The proposal, reviewed by lenders last week on a White House conference call, “prohibits referral to foreclosure until borrower is evaluated and found ineligible for HAMP or reasonable contact efforts have failed,” according to a Treasury Department document outlining the plan.

“It is one of the many ideas under consideration in the administration’s ongoing housing stabilization efforts,” Treasury spokeswoman Meg Reilly said in an e-mail. “This proposal has not been approved and there are no immediate planned announcements on the issue.”

She confirmed the authenticity of the document, which hasn’t been made public.

At present, lenders can initiate foreclosure proceedings on any loan that hasn’t been submitted for HAMP eligibility. Under current HAMP rules, foreclosure litigation can proceed while borrowers are under review for the program or even in a trial modification.

The proposed changes would prohibit lenders from initiating new foreclosure actions before loan screening by HAMP and would require lenders to halt existing proceedings for borrowers once they are in a trial repayment plan...

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ahuuwBS8KYq8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. $10 Says This Doesn't Happen
Obama's just not made of that kind of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. They still don't get it...
HAMP is a complete failure.

Only 166,000 folks have worked a deal through HAMP... and many are already defaulting on the deal.

Why--- because folks are turned upside down in their homes and will never get right side up unless principal is forgiven.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peggygirl Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or, unless ARMS are reversed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's really whats wrong here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. And they will never 'get it' with Goldman Sachs running the economic policy wing of the White House.
Edited on Fri Feb-26-10 08:20 AM by w4rma
And Rahm in charge of who gets hired and fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R for visibility... nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. I am interested to see how this could be legally enforceable, especially on state chartered banks
Edited on Fri Feb-26-10 10:43 AM by ProgressiveProfessor
or other financial institutions. Even harder on private mortgages. Its starting to look like rule by decree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. That bothers me.
Perhaps in the law's entrails there's some provision concerning soliciting applications--HAMP covers everybody in category X, but the assumption is that they'd willingly and voluntarily apply. But if they don't apply, it's possible to force the lender to solicit an application and if due diligence isn't followed then the foreclosure can't go through--with some government official's delegated aide responsible for approving whether 5 million or so application were duly sought.

Perhaps once an application is received somebody needs to sign off on it before the foreclosure is authorized.

Otherwise--and even then--it strikes me as perilously close to a taking without due process or compensation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Some people have been foreclosed on even when they thought
they had reached a deal with the lender under HAMP, as I recall. I don't think this is government overreach, it's just an additional hoop for lenders to jump through, in order to protect homeowners from having the rug pulled out from under them even when they complied with the HAMP procedures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC