Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

News Corp. empire crumbling around MURDOCH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 10:49 AM
Original message
News Corp. empire crumbling around MURDOCH
Edited on Fri Feb-26-10 10:51 AM by UTUSN
**********QUOTE********

http://gawker.com/5480363/the-fall-of-the-house-of-murdoch?skyline=true&s=i

The Fall of the House of Murdoch


.... Sure, News Corp. reported a better-than-expected $250 million profit last quarter on the strength of Fox News and Avatar, and all indications are that it has weathered the recession intact. But Murdoch's lifelong crusade has always been about more than just money—it's been about acquiring power, routing enemies, and the glorification of his own ego. And he has always accomplished those goals surrounded by a merry gang of corporate bandits, happily slitting throats and cutting deals with a vicious and entrepreneurial esprit de corps traceable to Murdoch's own tyrannical mien. It was an extraordinarily well-run company, guided by an iron fist.

No more. "It's terrible now," a News Corp. insider tells Gawker, relating the slow, Shakespearian devolution of Murdoch's fierce machinery into turmoil, factionalism, and infighting. The old man, nearing the end of his reign, no longer inspires enough fear or loyalty within his own ranks to keep the jostling for power beneath the surface, and a Lord of the Flies ugliness abounds. Roger Ailes has transformed Fox News into a highly profitable rogue political operation, jeopardizing Murdoch's most prized asset—his access to political power—with an unending stream of volatile rhetoric. His longtime consigliere and liaison to the Democratic power structure, Gary Ginsberg, decamped last year and just joined Time Warner. Matthew Freud, his own son-in-law, is lobbing bombs at Ailes in the pages of the New York Times. And Murdoch himself, though spry by any standards for a 78-year-old, is showing his age: His leadership has become unfocused, insiders say, and he's made a bizarre string of public statements, from agreeing with Glenn Beck that Barack Obama is a racist to claiming he never said that a few days later to blaming New York's political woes on Gov. David Paterson's blindness. The internal turmoil has led the News Corp. insider to commit the unforgivable sin of speaking of Murdoch in the past tense: "He had a good run."

The growing factionalism within News Corp.'s ranks as Murdoch nears the end of his days is likely to be the topic of a New York magazine story on the company, by reporter Gabriel Sherman, that is set to run next week. Sherman's nosing around has sparked considerable chatter in Murdoch-land, and insiders are said to fear that it may begin to shake loose some of the crumbling edifice of Murdoch's empire. .... (Four delish paragraphs more at link)


Send an email to the author of this post at john@gawker.com.

********UNQUOTE********
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Music to my ears!!!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. But Fox News is doing just fine.
Never underestimate the popularity of low standards and pandering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not really and here's why.
Edited on Fri Feb-26-10 01:00 PM by Kalyke
Take a close look at their ratings demographics: their audience is dying out:

According to a study released by Magna Global’s Steve Sternberg, the five broadcast nets’ average live median age (in other words, not including delayed DVR viewing) was 50 last season. That’s the oldest ever since Sternberg started analyzing median age more than a decade ago — and the first time the nets’ median age was outside of the vaunted 18-49 demo…

Among ad-supported cable nets, the news nets (along with older-skewing Hallmark Channel, Golf Channel and GSN’s daytime sked) sport the most gray, with Fox News Channel’s daytime and primetime skeds the absolute oldest, clocking in with a median age above 65.

By the way, MSNBC’s “Countdown with Keith Olbermann” does the best in cable news primetime among the most desirable younger demographic, but according to numbers from last season, the average “Countdown” viewer is 59 years old, and 55 percent of its audience is male.


http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/05/average-age-of-fox-news-viewer-is-65/

Therefore, Faux News may have a lot of people watching, but they're primarily the of the retired (read "fixed income" to an advertiser) variety and not as desirable to advertise to as younger (read "working with income" to an advertiser).

I still contend that a lot of Faux's viewership is as phony as their news stories. I think they count all the people forced to watch their drivel in barber shops, car repair shops, airport lounges and other waiting areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. this is true of most "news" programming--even the "good" stuff like Frontline &remember Nightline?
long gone--and P1 viewers (in businesses and hotels etc) won't prop any of them up forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. maybe all his spawn are wishing he'd die soon
so that they don't have to pay any "death taxes" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Emperor is (nearly) dead; long live the Empire.
Fox is doing just fine, selling us our own deaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. How's that Fox Business News working out? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 03:37 PM
Original message
let it be! i hate the evil murdoch empire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. let it be! i hate the evil murdoch empire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressOnTheMove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think the way to go is for some compassionate rich celebs to pay for cable for poor folks in red
Edited on Fri Feb-26-10 04:05 PM by ProgressOnTheMove
states. With only MSNBC or CNN as the new source, over faux with faux blocked. Somehow we have to get the message out farther and wider. It would be a crazy idea if, but we had Nadar dedicate a whole book to this idea and I concur. If they lvoe their coutnry and all it did to make them adored by many globally least they can do is work to save it. It all is an investment because whover they help becomes an undying fan automatically.

Wanda Sykes "With a black President people thought that maybe we can get some free cable." Yeah, why not??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. It can't happen fast enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC