Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This was inevitable; however, this is one of the reasons I didn't want her to run

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 11:28 PM
Original message
This was inevitable; however, this is one of the reasons I didn't want her to run
SET YOUR PHASERS TO "CLINTON." I don't understand why a Clinton's every action triggers mass episodes of idiocy among our press corps., but it's become depressingly clear that the last few years haven't in any way blunted the effect. The other day, in Iowa, Hillary had this exchange with reporters:

Mrs. Clinton’s comment about “bad men,” meanwhile, was one of the more memorable moments of her trip to Iowa, her first time since 2003.

She delivered the remark with touches of humor. She first summed up a question from John Wood, a man at the town hall forum here, putting it this way: “What in my background equips me to deal with evil and bad men?” Then she paused a few beats, setting the audience atwitter with laughter, and appeared to be blushing, her face down. Then, after deciding where to go with her answer, she said: “On a slightly more serious note, I believe a lot in my background and a lot in my public life shows the character and toughness to be president.”

At a news conference later this afternoon, where she was asked several times which bad men had been on her mind, Mrs. Clinton indicated at first that she was thinking about the need to capture Osama bin Laden, but a few moments later she said she was just being playful with her delivery.

“You guys!” she chuckled after the third question from a reporter on the topic. “I thought I was funny. You guys keep telling me, lighten up, be fun. Now I get a little funny, and I’m being psychoanalyzed.”

One reporter then asked her if she might have been thinking in some way about her husband.

“Oh, c’mon,” she said in a low voice, and then moved on.


Unsurprisingly, this was reported in The New York Times by Patrick Healy, a reporter whose obsession with Clinton's sex life long ago tipped into the pathological. Notice, too, the language used: Hillary delivered what's clearly a joke with "a touch of humor," suggesting that she was, beneath a thin membrane of levity, dead serious. Then, after the fourth question, her voice goes "low," indicating that the reporter has hit too close to home, and Hillary's strained jocularity can't hide the touchy bitterness resting inches beneath the surface. And now, here comes The Politico's Ben Smith, showing that when it comes to HRC, his new publication will be no less insipid and devoted to BS pop-psychology than its lumbering predecessors:

http://www.prospect.org/weblog/2007/01/post_2606.html#015280

I know many of you have seen my "National Anthem" thread.

Yes, it's stupid, silly and predictable.

and the 10th time it will happen it will be just as stupid, silly and predictable.

But what of the 100th time? the 1000th?

How can she get her message out with the press and the RW echo chamber constantly latching onto miscues, real or imagined, and dissecting every verb, subject, noun, participle and past participle of every thing she says just to make her look like some sort of out of control Bride of Frankenstein liberal bitch from hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know Cat...she doesn't seem to be worried about the toll
of this war. She seems not concerned. I look at Cheney and the rest of the Bushies and don't see any grief in their faces. She seems pretty happy chatting with the press about her "evil men" comment.

A few years ago I would have welcomed her running to get Big Dog Back in. Times have changed, though. I find I have a hard time thinking about the Clinton's back in the White House. But...whatever. I just feel everything she does is for HER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am not a fan of Hilarys, but this does not mean that I dislike her.
In imho Patrick Healy's jaws should be slapped severely. Shows what an incompetent writer he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. You forgot the teen crush of Matthews who will never report her seriously because of it.
Edited on Mon Jan-29-07 11:36 PM by illinoisprogressive
I'm no fan but, you will never get a serious or objective view or report to seriously look at this race. If they are not disecting then they are blubbering and how can someone be taken as a person this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. God bless her; I wish she wouldn't run for president
Just like Edward Kennedy, she can be an amazingly effective senator as long as she likes and make a huge difference, while the insane hatred of the press would keep her from accomplishing much even if she were elected president. There are worse fates than being a beloved senator from New York. Daniel Patrick Monyhan (sp?) comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well if she were elected bushitler has created the unitary executive office
for her, unless we tear it down. Have you seen his latest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. I hate to say it, but the lady's made of teflon. 1000th time and she'll still be standing.
She is ready for this campaign. They are already throwing it at her and she is deflecting the blows like a seasoned pro. Guess she did learn a thing or two from Husband Clinton.

She's not my first, second, third, or fourth choice, but if she is still keeping her cool like this 7-8 months from now, we're going to be looking at another Clinton on the Dem ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. you forget how early it is. these attacks have a way of becoming old
and she will get some immunity to them over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC