|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 09:42 AM Original message |
A question for those that currently oppose articles of impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donkeykick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. It will make it through Congress... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. So that's a no? You will continue to hold your position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donkeykick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. All one needs to do is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. It hurt the Rape-Publicans because THAT was an attempted coup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 12:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. A point worth emphasizing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stardust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Refresh my memory, please: How did Clinton's impeachment hurt the repubs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
37. Yes it did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
26. So I'm going to take that as definitively no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. In the end, anything could cost the '08 election. But if it happens because we... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. What crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. What an intelligent, well-reasoned response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #7 |
21. At some point this reaches the level of an abuse victim's logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
54. You don't believe in supporting the Constitution and rule of law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. ooops address to wrong poster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. If you look at US history, it would probably GIVE us the WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. I'd think taking a strong stand against abuse of power... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 10:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
55. And here, especially, but the number of people willing to let these criminals walk is staggering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. Yes. And following the argument against it because elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 06:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
40. It would not cost the 08 election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluerum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
3. It's not that I oppose impeachment. Until it is clear that the republicks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. So that's a no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluerum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Ok - let me spell it out - I support impeachment no matter what candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. So you disagree with your candidate or that the reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluerum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:11 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. I have no candidate at this point. I don't need someone else to tell me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. If its a sideshow now, then to be intellectually honest, your position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluerum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. You are right mmonk. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I'm not asking or arguing to be "right". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluerum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Thats not what I said though. I am an open advocate of impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. OK. That's fine. Sorry for the confusion. I understand your position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
9. I've got to go and take care of some work but will check back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
10. I'm currently not supporting any candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
18. I don't have a candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. Too bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. A partisan Impeachment is worse than no Impeachment at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 08:41 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Recent history? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. actually it did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 08:58 AM Response to Reply #43 |
46. What about Nixon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Nixon was bipartisan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. And why did it end up that way? It sure didn't start that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 06:03 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. I have no problem with investigations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 10:00 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Again, because it was legitimate. Thus the Nixon analogy is more appropriate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Thank you, by the way, for amply proving my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 08:45 AM Response to Reply #39 |
45. You actually buy that talking point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. So it is my fault you don't know history? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 01:40 AM Response to Reply #50 |
56. Did I say that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 05:25 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Andrew Johnson isn't an obscure reference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:57 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
19. Of course they won't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
31. I'm all for impeachment, AND I think DK is grandstanding. One *can* think both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. If someone else entered articles, would they be grandstanding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. (a) I don't know - depends on the details, (b) It's possible to grandstand AND support articles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
34. When It Becomes Realistic That It Could Make It Through Both The House AND Senate, Then I'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. How do you know what it would or would not clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. I Said When It Becomes Realistic, Not Certain. I Hope You Know The Huge Difference Between The Two. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 08:35 AM Response to Reply #34 |
44. So demanding accountability from our leaders is futile? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-29-07 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
36. I'm against articles, but I dong argue that Kucinich is grandstanding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
52. Of course. I'm not a one-issue voter. That would be stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC