Who has done more long term harm to America, bush or bin Laden?

Anyone with a search engine can look up how many decades the bushes and our own government have been in cahoots with ol' whats'his name, Osama been forgotten, decades of business connections and military relationships, he WAS public enemy number one, but I never hear his name anymore.

Who has fucked this nation over more? Are they both equally responsible? Can you blame one without the other?

I haven't heard from that bastard Osama in many years, but I have to look at and suffer at the hands of those assholes bush and cheney and their little U.S. Taliban, who should I be more concerned about?

Don't tell me, I already know.

The Bush Family Evil Empire and their Lords of New World Order.

uttered by George H.W. Bush on Sept. 11, 1990 - 11 years before the attacks?

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/war/bushsr.htm

because we dare make that connection.

You see, the COINCIDENCE THEORISTS here think IranContra, BCCI, Iraqgate and CIA drugrunning are all old issues that were resolved...completely unaware that they were left to CONTINUE throughout the 90s.

Poppy Bush NEVER STOPPED running the real fascist agenda just because he wasn't in the oval office.

From being a one-term echo of his dad's, only more inept. The traitorous fuckfaces surrounding an otherwise feckless and thoughtless stooge grabbed ahold of the 9/11 crisis and turned it into the engine of not only a Bush second term, but the machine that smashed Iraq and much of America.

Bin Laden no doubt hoped for such a wicked and foolish response from America, but Bush's idiocy has surely exceeded his wildest dreams.

Nevertheless, Bin Laden is a wacko of limited means and vision; Bush has been a wacko of limited vision and almost unlimited means. The blame rests with Bush.

Just imagine America's response to 9/11 had President Gore been allowed to assume the office he won in November 2000. Not only would the last 6 years have been vastly different for America and the world, but so would the next 50 years.

An argument can be made that the Supreme Court bears more responsibility than Bin Laden for our current parlous state.

I think Bush was going to ride this in to being a hero. Or try. It is like the dying age of a class that felt it was born to rule. Both these men are part of it. I think Larden has made a dent in the worlds thinking and Bush has helped him. Some how people must face the fact that the Western culture can not rule the world and let other alone to do it how they wish in their own country. I am not sure we can leave it alone we are so sure we are right. I am not sure we are wrong, that Western ways will take over, but I think these people have to do it in their own way, and not ours. This is what Larden has said over and over. Stay out of our country and Bush keeps putting us there. It has to be madding for these people to see us fighting for what we want in side their country. Can't any one see what we would do if they came here and started pushing us around? Bush and Larden fit together very well. If Larden had prayed to God he could not have got better help than what he got from glory boy Bush. BUSH HAS DONE MORE HARM

The number of Americans killed in Iraq exceeds the number killed on 9/11. The total number of deaths in Iraq is more than 20 times the number killed on 9/11. Imagine a 9/11 occurring once every month for nearly two years.

The number of deaths in Iraq exceeds the number of people killed at Buchenwald and doubles the number killed at Dachau.

What's the current excuse? "Mistakes were made?"

I think that's all you need to know, right there. :grr: That said, I'm not justifying the actions of either one of those terrorist bastards - I hate 'em both, and I hope they both rot in hell for what they've done. :grr: But in terms of sheer numbers...well. 3,336 (officially confirmed as of today, and counting) vs. 2,973 - you do the math. :cry:

Edited to add: And that's not even counting the tens of thousands of Iraqis who have died by the chimp's bloody hand.