Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel looks at Stupak's C Street ties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:09 PM
Original message
Rachel looks at Stupak's C Street ties
including his unbelievably inexpensive rent.

Go, Rachel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very impressive (as always). Peeling back the layers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let him keep up this abortion shite
with the Health Care bill - they'll fuck him up properly with the subsidized rent at the Family House.

Get the popcorn. This is going to be a feast. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. $600 a month to live in a swanky room, including meals and maid service at C-Street....
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 09:21 PM by seafan
.... just a few blocks from the Capitol... $600 a month he reported last year-- yeah, right. Rachel is asking 'who subsidized this rent?'


So, who did Stupak send his rent checks to? "The Family" denies they were the recipients.


Get 'em, Rachel.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It will be the IRS and the Ethics Committee
I'm lovin' it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. From your lips to God's ears...
wouldn't that just be the best?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oh yes
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Yep, this creep has got to go. He is a disgrace. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yep, $600/mo. in that tax free luxury religious cult house! What a deal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. I KNEW it. Stupak is on the take.
The Democratic party should outlaw membership in the Family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's amazing that she
is able to discover these things and report them while those so called, 'journalists' for some of the best known, widely read, mainstream media can not. :sarcasm:

Go Rachel!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Was Rachel's guest in that segmaent named Ed Brayton? This LINK has just about
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 10:34 PM by ProgressiveEconomist
everything revealed about Stupak in Rachel's segment. To research it, all she needed to do was start was a simple google search, and follow up by calling the reporters who authored the best 'hits'. My first try:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2B%22The+Family%22+%2B%22C+Street%22+stupak+pitts&btnG=Search

got me as second hit a great piece by a Michigan reporter named Ed Brayton. Was that the name of Rachel's guest tonight?

http://michiganmessenger.com/23484/stupak-denies-knowledge-of-connections-to-mysterious-c-street-house.

"Stupak denies knowledge of connections to mysterious 'C Street' house he lives in

By Ed Brayton 7/23/09 3:26 PM

... The C Street house, a former convent, is still listed on official tax documents as a church but it functions largely as a boarding house, with six to eight members of the U.S. House and Senate living there at any given time. Current residents include Stupak, Rep. Zach Wamp (R-Tenn.), Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) and Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.), and Rep. Heath Shuler (D-N.C.). The house has become the focus of much attention after the public admissions of adultery by Ensign and Gov. Mark Sanford of South Carolina. It has been widely reported that Coburn and other residents of the house knew of Ensign's affair long before it became public and helped him negotiate his way through it. ... When asked if there were any ethical concerns created by living in a house inaccurately listed as a church in order to evade property taxes, Stupak replied: 'I don't own the building, I don't know how the landlord has it listed. I pay rent for a room. I sleep there. I have a room.'"

Jeff Sharlet, contributing editor at Harper¡s magazine and the author of 'The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power,' lived for a time at Ivanwald, another boarding house owned by the group in Arlington, Va., this one for younger men without political power. Sharlet said that Stupak's denial of any knowledge of The Family or its activities is false. 'When I lived with The Family at Ivanwald, a house for younger men being groomed for leadership, I was told that Stupak was a regular visitor to the Cedars,' Sharlet said. The Cedars is yet another compound owned by The Family, one that hosts weekly prayer events led by former Reagan-era Attorney General Ed Meese. Sharlet said that Stupak had much greater involvement with the group than he is admitting, noting that the congressman was 'a Family-assigned mentor to one of my brothers at Ivanwald.' That Ivanwald resident, Sharlet said, 'regularly left for what he and others described as mentoring sessions.' Another reason to doubt Stupak¡s denials, Sharlet said, is that members of the organization and those who live at the C Street house are sworn to secrecy about what goes on there, as fellow resident Zach Wamp admitted to the Knoxville News in the wake of the recent scandals. That makes such denials less credible, Sharlet said.

'The bottom line here is that Stupak is either being dishonest or confessing dangerous ignorance,' Sharlet said. 'The house's function has been public knowledge since the wrote about it 7 years ago. Multiple mainstream media outlets have reported on the house¡s role as in effect, a lobby in all but name, led by a man who is on video and audio record citing the leadership lessons of Hitler, Stalin, and Mao.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. She has just linked the entire Bush administration ...
plus Dick and Lynn Cheney as Al Qaeda ... it was hilarious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. that was a thing of beauty
I was laughing uncontrollably at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC