Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gibbs Fires Back At Chief Justice Roberts Over Obama Criticism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:11 PM
Original message
Gibbs Fires Back At Chief Justice Roberts Over Obama Criticism
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 11:21 PM by cal04
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/09/gibbs-fires-back-at-chief_n_492633.html

The White House fired back at Justice John Roberts Tuesday night, after the Supreme Court Chief told a crowd that he found it "very troubling" that President Barack Obama would criticize the court during his State of the Union address.

In a statement sent to reporters, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that the only troubling thing was the 5-4 ruling by the court, which said that corporations could spend unlimited amounts of money advocating on behalf of candidates in elections. Roberts leads the court.

"What is troubling is that this decision opened the floodgates for corporations and special interests to pour money into elections - drowning out the voices of average Americans," Gibbs said. "The President has long been committed to reducing the undue influence of special interests and their lobbyists over government. That is why he spoke out to condemn the decision and is working with Congress on a legislative response."

The push back against the Supreme Court header from the White House seems almost unprecedented in its directness, though White House officials claim previous administrations expressed equally public criticisms of the court. Undoubtedly, it's bound to spur another round of debates over what constitutes proper decorum between the two branches.


War of Words Continues Between White House, Supreme Court
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/03/war-of-words-continues-between-white-house-supreme-court.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure Gibbs had that response all ready to go since the night of the SOTU
Just waiting for that moron to open his big fat trap and take the bait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Impeach Roberts NOW. He helped steal 2000.
They guy is a disgrace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. +1000000
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 11:18 PM by cascadiance
Damned activist judge that claims HYPOCRITICALLY to be a "constitutional constructionist", but in effect violates it in the most severe way that's happened since Dred Scott decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Our right wing court has been an embarrassment worldwide . . .
except so much that is happening in "America" is an embarrassment these days!

How does an "embarrassment" compete with TORTURE? Presidential election steals!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. On what Charge?
Stating an opinion. Lets see, a person states an opinion and he gets fired for it. That is something that they would really like to do over on the free republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Utoward Judicial activism
and lying to the Senate during confirmation procedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. see pscot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. On the charge of helping fix the 2000 election
Edited on Thu Mar-11-10 12:20 AM by autorank
The charge was made but, guess what, the evidence was all "lost" or "otherwise unavailable."

He never deserved the nomination and richly deserves to be impeached. Check out his role in planning the 2000 heist. It's the biggest crime ever - stealing an entire election.


"Judge Roberts worked to ensure that George Bush would become president -- regardless of what the courts might decide. And now he is being rewarded for that partisan service by being appointed to the nation's highest court."

US Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Florida)
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0721-07.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I wholheartedly agree with the first part
But, I he wasn't on the court in time to steal 2000. Do you mean in some other capacity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Roberts helped steal 2000?
How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Remember, Roberts was highly involved in 2000 . .
guiding the machinery that kept lies afloat -- and he was also part of

the fascist rally in Miami-Dade county to stop the mandated vote recount!!

Big part of their "win."

Btw, there's a PETITION you can sign at "http://www.freepress.org" -- to call

for removal of "personhood" right re corporations. Hartmann discussed this

a few days ago and gave the link --



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now that's more like it..
Bet Obama wishes he'd been more active in the Alito filibuster now- rather than criticizing the effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Corporations have been able to spend unlimited funds in the past...
...All this changes is the hoops they had to jump through to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. More like this, please
We seem to have entered into an existential fight for the concept of the United States. There are very definite forces coalescing and arrayed to undermine the Constitution and give up on the American system. Disagreements aren't just policy or procedure differences; they are differences about the fundamental way we run the country. Is the power of our nation vested in courts, or corporations, or the executive branch, or does rest with We the People?

If you think the people should run the country, then you'd better start acting like these kinds of things matter, because they most certainly do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broke In Jersey Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. why does the SC even attend the SOTU address???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. With a little luck
JR will have a fit about this. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. I haven't seen 'proper decorum' since Monica Lewinski
It's amusing how harrumphed they get when their thin skins get the same treatment they like to hand out. What a bunch of babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. Thank you, Mr. Gibbs
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. SCOTUS Rulings Require We Sit & "Take It"
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 11:51 AM by otohara
up the ass.

Bush vs Gore and others come to mind.

Shit, I can't even write an e-mail to the "untouchables" over at The Supreme Ct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC