Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Concerning the Health Insurance Mandate, I just don't see it happening

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:55 PM
Original message
Concerning the Health Insurance Mandate, I just don't see it happening
When the 'final' health care reform bill passes through Congress and is signed by the President it will probably mandate the purchase of insurance by everyone. There can be no doubt the "mandate" provision(s) will be in front of the Court long before it or they go into effect. Considering the makeup of the current Court, what might better be called the Scalia Court than the Roberts Court, I just don't see much chance of the mandate surviving. It will be up to Kennedy of course.

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, I can see THIS court going for giving insurance companies millions more clients
while not having to deal with pesky competition. Tight vote, but the corporate puppets on that bench don't give me much to be hopeful about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yep what you are saying rings very true.
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 07:09 PM by truedelphi
We have Corporate Lackeys at every step of the way, so it doesn't matter one whit about the so called "separation of Powers."

If all of those separated powers are owned by the Elite, nothing will ever stop the Elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would think just the opposite.
We have a court so friendly to corporations that it thinks they're people.

Why wouldn't they rule in favor of their BFFs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. But think of Heller - where they affirmed Individual Rights.
There is a strong pull on this Court to think of themselves as colonial men, men of the frontier, owing and accountable to few men and little of society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well...
I look at it this way: without the consent of individuals, you don't even have society to begin with. Unless you want to resort to autocracy, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. This is not that different from the court that decided that eminent domain could be used for...
private companies. I'm not saying that your view is impossible (given our luck they would find the mandate unconstitutional along with FICA), but I could also see them being for the mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. I sort of agree
Not because of the Court but because I am not convinced that the mandate will be enforced with any real vigor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have yet to see any Democrat demonstrate where the mandate is Constitutional
Not even Rachel Maddow seems willing to tackle this thorny question.

I can see where the mandate would be tolerable if a public option were available, but otherwise it's destined for "epic fail" in front of SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. If it's not the supreme court that brings down the mandate it will
be the sheer weight of the huge inadequacies in the half assed bill. Ins. companies are the problem. This bill just cements them into place. Massive fail. I give it about 3 years of constant attacks both by those on the left and middle who realize they can't afford to pay for nothing and those on the right who will fight anything no matter how bad or good it is. I also think the ins. co's will do the same as the credit card companies and horrify everyone by increasing cost and abuse before the regulations can kick in, if they ever do.

I'm looking forward to a real boost to the underground cash economy in order for folks to keep claimed income to a minimum, not necessarily to cheat the system out of taxes but because people won't be able to afford their portion of premiums. Especially since care will be out of reach because of co-pays and deductibles. They'll be forced to tithe to the ins. gods for air, basically. I don't know anyone who can afford that.

There will also be a lot of folks like me who will keep their incomes under the cut-off for medicaid. I won't pay what I consider to be mass murderers a cent. I'm an average uninsured 53 year old working class woman, I've got lots of company in that respect. The median income for a woman in this country is a bit over $34,000. Half make less. There is nothing left to squeeze out of them.

What a nightmare this is going to be for people in the lower classes. The demand for medicaid is going to be enormous. 30% of doctors don't take it and 40% of specialists. Should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tazkcmo Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Me too
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 07:41 PM by tazkcmo
Except I'm a man, 47. Don't know the median income, just mine which is below 20k. I will not send anything to these bastards. Hopefully they'll throw me in jail so I can get health care.

edited to add the word "know".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. The median is about 10,000 over that for a woman.
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 07:59 PM by ipaint
Doesn't make much difference if your way under the halfway point. Also the unemployment rate for folks making 25,000 and below is 30%. We are in a severe depression. People in the lower working class can't afford this.

The comfortable middle class has always lived in their own little dream world complete with their delusion they call the american dream. Most don't have a clue which is why you see the well off on the left- tv people, top bloggers, journalists and so called progressive politicians, signing off on this bill. These are the same people who allowed the ins. companies to kill of 2 million lower working class people over two decades without a peep of protest and then started crying bloody murder because the ins. cos decided to start nipping at their pampered heels.

I don't expect them to have my lower working class best interests at heart. That is not something the comfortable middle class is capable of in any real numbers. The only people I have seen consistently take people like us into consideration is the doctors at pnhp.org. and they advocate for single payer.

Oh and wait until the repubs start hacking away at the subsidy amounts. Ha! the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. wouldn't they have already struck down the Mass law?
I'm not sure they will touch this. I still don't see the mandate as very enforceable or very cost effective to enforce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Supreme Court
has been absolutely OK with a lot of things that Congress mandates. Why are you so convinced that this won't be a unanimous decision (if it ever comes to that) in favor of letting Congress and the President mandate universal coverage (or fine in lieu of it)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC