Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California Impeachment Resolution Passed- Another Historic Step on Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 09:53 AM
Original message
California Impeachment Resolution Passed- Another Historic Step on Impeachment


http://www.pdamerica.org/articles/news/2007-04-30-07-02-01-news.php

Another Historic Step on Impeachment
April 30, 2007, San Diego, CA

Sparked by an insurgency among delegates, the California Democratic Party has taken an historic step forward on the issue of impeachment. In a resolution affirmed by the full state party convention Sunday, the Democrats called on the U.S. Congress to use its subpoena power to investigate misdeeds of President Bush and Vice President Cheney – and to hold the Administration accountable “with appropriate remedies and punishment, including impeachment.” The delegate insurgency was coordinated by Progressive Democrats of America and its allies.

While Speaker Pelosi had declared impeachment “off the table,” the Democratic Party rank-and-file has demonstrated its commitment to putting the issue “on” the table. And it’s no longer just the rank-and-file: Even among the members of the convention’s Resolutions Committee (appointed by the California Party chair), the impeachment resolution was the top vote-getter (tied with one other resolution).

Coming on the heels of mass actions and resolutions across the country in support of impeachment, and Congressman Dennis Kucinich’s introduction of Articles of Impeachment against Cheney, this action by the powerful California Democratic Party builds on the pro-impeachment momentum.

The resolution refers to Bush and Cheney having acted in a manner “subversive of the Constitution” by. . .

1. using false information to justify the invasion of Iraq
2. authorizing “the torture of prisoners of war”
3. “authorizing wiretaps on U.S. citizens without obtaining a warrant”
4. “disclosing the name of an undercover CIA operative”
5. suspending “the historic Writ of Habeas Corpus by ordering the indefinite detention of so-called enemy combatants”
6. “signing statements used to ignore or circumvent portions of over 750 Congressional statutes”


The resolution ends by calling for “vigorous investigation” and “appropriate remedies and punishment, including impeachment.”

This action represents the successful culmination of PDA’s one-month, eleven-city barnstorming tour across California – aimed at putting impeachment and ending the occupation of Iraq at the top of the Party’s agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. K and R Great News!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Now Call the speaker
again and again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meldroc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nice! Keep the heat on Pelosi.
We know she's listening. Keep the pressure up and I think she can be persuaded to change her mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great news!
Good for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazyriver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. Way to go California...
We're trying here in Maine too. 10,000+ signatures so far...


www.maineimpeach.org





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. we need more states to join this movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. It looks like impeachment is in Speaker Pelosi's lap.
Thanks for posting this. I was dying to hear how the convention constructed this.

It's big stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. somebody send this to the asswipe editor at LA Times nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gillamonster Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarryNite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Set the table
then take out the trash!
:bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Is this Mark Leno's bill -- does anyone know? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is why you have to go to your local Democratic Club elections
Edited on Tue May-01-07 10:24 PM by bemildred
and vote for the county committee members and state delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. this is a positive step, but until impeachment attracts bi-partisan support
I think its not going anywhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trudyco Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. What does impeaching proceedings buy over the investigations
going on every day now? Do they get to hire a special prosecutor and circumvent Bush appointees like Gonzo? Do they get to tap into a slush fund so they can have enough people to uncover everything? What's the upside?

Or are they basically doing the same thing as an impeachment proceeding at this point (investigating) and they can just wait until they have either a smoking gun or perponderance of evidence and then introduce a recommendation to impeach?

In other words are they DOING impeachment proceedings without actually using the "I" word so the bought MSM won't thrash them with it until the evidence is so overwhelming even the MSM can't use talking points to get out of the obvious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Subpoena power
Just as it's the threat of a filibuster that ultimately provides the "power" that makes the "Senatorial hold" possible, so is impeachment the power that makes Congressional subpoena power possible for use against the executive branch.

And we all want that, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is getting good!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC