EU food labels may get traffic-light treatment

Source: Salon

The past few weeks, there's been a considerable amount of chatter about American food labeling. Earlier this month, the FDA warned several companies about their misleading food labels, and the agency is currently pursuing an initiative to change the way American labels work. Possible changes include moving products' nutrition and ingredient information to the front of each package, and changing the serving sizes to more accurately reflect the amounts that average Americans eat. Meanwhile, the Institute of Medicine is investigating packaging symbols and logos, which are a "major consideration for consumers in making food purchases."

But none of this is as drastic as what's currently being considered in the European Union. As Time magazine reports, the Europeans are currently exploring their own labeling options to help stem the continent's expanding waistline -- and one is particularly dramatic:

The most controversial of the proposals so far is a flashy label backed by health and consumer groups that's based on the colors of a traffic light. Already fixtures in many British supermarkets, the labels use red, yellow and green circles to indicate how healthy products are in four categories: fat, saturated fat, sugar and salt. If a box of cookies is high in sugar, for instance, it'll get a red light.

Imagine a supermarket aisle filled with red, yellow and green lights -- it certainly sounds effective, doesn't it? As Time's Cendrowicz points out, a study in Australia found that people were "five times more likely to identify healthy food options when they see color-coded nutrition labels." Unsurprisingly, the European food and drink industry isn't too pleased with the idea (arguing, instead, that companies should be allowed to choose their own labels -- to avoid making "blanket judgements about foodstuffs.") Given the strength of the American food lobby, it's pretty unimaginable that anything like this would ever become a possibility in the U.S.


Read more: http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/03/19/traffic_light_food_labels/index.html

I'd go for it.

Keebler can suck sweaty donkey balls.

I already shop on the outside of the store, ignoring the over-processed high sugar high fat crap in the middle.

Anything that helps people to quickly compare the overall healthiness of one food to another is a good thing.

Reading labels like a hawk the way I do, the first thing I do is figure out how many "servings" are in a package of food. They are able to gloss over how many calories are in the total package that way. Divving it up into really small amounts let them sneak about with fat, sugar, and salt amounts too. It's not enough to read the label, you have to do the math too.