Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ominously For Ensign, Probe's Focus Appears To Shift To Possible Quid Pro Quo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 04:15 PM
Original message
Ominously For Ensign, Probe's Focus Appears To Shift To Possible Quid Pro Quo
Couldn't happen to a nicer feller. And it's about time justice was served. :popcorn:

Ominously For Ensign, Probe's Focus Appears To Shift To Possible Quid Pro Quo
Zachary Roth | March 19, 2010, 3:49PM


Buried under the pile of details that have emerged in the last 48 hours on the John Ensign investigation is one crucial over-arching development: The federal probe into the matter appears to have expanded, and shifted its focus in a way that may could make it an even graver threat to the Nevada senator than before.

In a nutshell: The Justice Department investigation began as an inquiry into whether Ensign flouted a lobbying ban by trying to help Doug Hampton get a lobbying job after Hampton left Ensign's office, and by directing his staff to work with Hampton once he was set up as a lobbyist. But now, it seems, investigators have also moved beyond Hampton, to consider whether the senator illegally tied legislative favors to contributions to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which he chaired.


To be sure, a breach of lobbying rules, as may have occurred here, would be significant. But a direct quid pro quo involving Ensign -- who continues to maintain that he has done nothing illegal -- would potentially constitute far more serious wrong-doing.

What's the evidence that the Feds have shifted their focus?

KLAS-TV reported yesterday that among the issues the Justice Department is looking at is the relationship between Ensign and eCommLink, a Las Vegas credit card company. The firm and several other local credit card firms, KLAS reported, had recently lost out on a bid for a federal contract, and wanted to boost their influence in Washington. Ensign's office reportedly told the companies about proposed new credit card regulations that would hurt the industry, and said it would fight the proposals in exchange for a $28,000 contribution to the NRSC, which eCommLink gave. (Could those regulations be these?)

more...

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/ominously_for_ensign_probes_focus_appears_to_shift.php?ref=fpb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for this link
Missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You're welcome! I just read somewhere
(you!) that Rachel is covering this tonight. I'm glad someone is highlighting this scumbucket. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ensign is one of the more deserving of a nice intrusive investigation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Absolutely, and he has been for awhile. This just proves that
the wheels of justice grind slowly, but sometimes it's worth the wait! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why is the so-called liberal media ignoring this?
'Cause it isn't liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Rachel just did a great segment on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for this info. It is much appreciated. NT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Hey!
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rec this post.
This guy was a key player on the Senate Finance Committee during the two week markup. So, he must have had other things on his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rec for, can something MORE "ominous" happen to ENSIGN?!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC