Question - Who is pulling strings of Rush/Beck/Cantor et al? Fox? Rove?

Who are the men behind the curtain? I have seen a couple of posts here about how Fox is defending and spreading Rep. Cantor's lie about the gun shot to his office, but it was all a choreographed "dance" yesterday, and I would like to know who is the head honcho that sends these "messages" out? Really - I was in my car yesterday and wanted to hear the news and weather so I turned our local AM station on and Beck was still on and was going on and on about it being the Democrats faults that violence was happening - Then Rushy Nut comes on and he immediately starts in with the same message - Then I hear Rep. Cantor come on and he says the same thing! It was like W was still around and Rove was pulling the strings!

I am so pissed that these idiots can spew this crap even with police reports that show that the violence is real! I just posted a reply on the DU post about the road rage in TN with the 10-yr-old girl in the car because of a bumper sticker some nut job saw! If this is the Republican Party of 2010 how can anyone with any decency and intelligence support this? I heard Frum was fired yesterday too because he was being honest and this is the very person the Repub's need to support if they want to get back some credibility! Is there any hope someone will stand up and speak the truth?

:hide:

Murdoch is head of News Corp CEO which owns Faux and Roger Ailes is head of Faux.

Rush pulls the strings of himself. Faux gets good ratings off of Beck. The Rethugs don't control themselves, that is for sure.

They are experts in "planting information" into the media.

Creative Response Concepts

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Creative_Response_Concepts

Creative Response Concepts, an Alexandria, Virginia-based public relations firm, "has many links to the Republican Party and the conservative movement," Eric Boehlert wrote September 10, 2004, in Salon.

"Among its clients are the Republican National Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee. Its client list also includes the Christian Coalition, National Taxpayers Union, Media Research Council and Regnery Publishing. Regnery is the firm that published Unfit for Command, the SBVT screed against Kerry's military record," Boehlert wrote.

"Interview requests for CRC's clients are routed through the main switchboard at a single telephone number; extensions 108 and 110 at the same number handle Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, while extensions 109 and 130 are for the Judicial Confirmation Network," Todd Johnston wrote July 5, 2005, in ePluribus Media.

........

Do you know if the Democrats have anything like this? Thanks again - I would have never known!

Swift Boats for truth = CRC

Mrs. Alito running from hubby Sam's hearing in tears = CRC

Anti health care reform = CRC

Al Gore is doing it for the money = CRC

CRC is staffed by former media people who are very welled paid to plant stories
in the media. Karl Rove had them on his speed dial.

Sounds like a story Rachel would be good at reporting on! I really am amazed at all the pies they have their fingers in!

A CRC handler was sitting right next to her and she started her water works when
Lindsey Grahamn was giving her husband softball question but that night the
news was about those mean dems asking all those nasty questions to good old Sam
Allito. CRC was ready with press releases w/ in minutes of her "running from the
room in tears" because of the treatment of Sam. CRC was able to change the
face of the hearings from looking @ Sam's conflict of interest ?s in his rulings and that
he helped to found an organization that tried to keep women and blacks out of
Princeton.

Everybody in the media knows about CRC but nobody says a thing so as not to
mess up "the gravy train" to former media types.

I will keep my ears and eyes open from now on to see if I learn any more about them and their influence. Powerful stuff for sure!

:popcorn:

"Among its clients are the Republican National Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee. Its client list also includes the Christian Coalition, National Taxpayers Union, Media Research Council and Regnery Publishing."

A lttle history about Regnery: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Regnery_Publishing
"It was founded in 1947 by Henry Regnery and was originally located in Chicago, Illinois. It originally had a close affiliation with the University of Chicago, and published books for the Great Books series at the University, which were primarily classics. One of the first major books it published was William F. Buckley, Jr.'s God and Man at Yale. In the 1970s Henry's son, Henry F. Regnery, worked at the company, but was killed in a commercial airliner crash. In the 1980s, Alfred S. Regnery, another son of Henry, took control of the company. The company is now part of Eagle Publishing, which is an affiliated company of Phillips Publishing."

A little footnote about rightwing funding: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Media_Research_Center
Funding

* Exxon Mobil<5>
* The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, Inc.
* Sarah Scaife Foundation
* Castle Rock Foundation
* John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.
* The Carthage Foundation
* JM Foundation<6>


Warning: following the links at Sourcewatch can lead you to believe conspiracies exist.
:tinfoilhat: :patriot:
Highly recommended.

That is the thing I love most about DU, I am always learning something. There are some people on here that know so much more then I could ever learn myself and I love hearing from them. I didn't see the background info so thanks for posting that and also the contributors. It does all make sense doesn't it that big corporations would have their hand in it! Maybe you should post this for others to see. Good job!

P.S. I found it funny that 3 people unrec'd this - hmmm - freepers?

:fistbump:

That's what rules the country now...or so they thought. They're LIVID!!!

I have been wondering if there is something coming up with him, like running for office again or being placed in a lucrative position, i.e. lobbyist?

No difference.

don

Faux and the other RW radio shows follow rushs talking points daily.

He's an easy purchase, and he's so friggin' wealthy now he could never spend it all.

and FoxNews barks out the marching orders.

:hide:

are hellbent on making it appear to the ignorant masses that the Democrats are attacking them now! Which only stokes up more anger and violence from these ill-minded buffoons who are tossing bricks, calling in threats that say people should die a horrible death, and cutting gas lines!

I seriously believe Faux should be sanctioned by the FCC for inciting, because the story is false they're promoting and they are the company that continually stokes fear against Obama.

All I can keep thinking, based on the emails I get from some very paranoid former co-workers from over the years, is they must really believe he's not an American. I don't think it's just that he's "black" to them, it's the fear of the Muslims and that he may be a foreign man hellbent on destroying their way of life - when their way of life was destroyed a ton by Reagan, Bush I, a bit by Clinton, and heavily by Bush II.

:kick:

The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Ave NE
Washington DC 20002-4999
ph 202.546.4400 | fax 202.546.8328

The 411 of right wing spew.

I can't believe the huge discrimination in the two sides given on the net about them! They are either the best thing going or the worst thing ever.

I found this interesting though:

Hidden bipartisanship, phony partisan wars: The Heritage Foundation has it!
March 24, 2010

http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/2010/03/24/hidden-bipartisanship-phony-partisan-wars-the-heritage-foundation-has-it/

........NOVEMBER IS NOW

But behind this electoral frenzy, this is what happened:

In the 90s the Clintons were working on real healthcare reform. Republicans and the bought Democrats (Moynihan, Daschle et al) made sure that didn’t even come to a vote. The Heritage foundation came up with an alternative.

It has been a long slog, since those days in the early 1990s when right-wing policy analysts proposed an individual mandate to purchase health coverage as a respectable, market-oriented, responsibility-based alternative to either government-provided health care (the nanny state) or mandated employer-provided health care (the boss state).

As right wing ideas usually come with big money and big wheels behind them, this one made it into law in Massachusetts – widely known (and loathed) as Romneycare.....in a visit at the GOP retreat Obama lets them know that:

The component parts of this thing are pretty similar to what Howard Baker, Bob Dole, and Tom Daschle proposed at the beginning of this debate last year.

What he was probably referring to is this Heritage Foundation draft

Step #1: Rapidly expand private health coverage to include the uninsured.

snip

Thus, the most effective way to reduce inappropriate ED utilization is to institute sound “premium support” programs that would enable Medicaid patients to purchase quality private health insurance coverage with better access to care. The right policy is to integrate the working uninsured population and non-disabled Medicaid and SCHIP beneficiaries into a reformed private health insurance market.

snip

For lower-income persons, Congress could also enact a generous individual health care tax credit program, particularly for those who do not and cannot get health insurance through the workplace.

(More at link)

.......

Hmmm where have we heard that before? And so their influence is immense it seems on both sides - or am I reading it wrong?



:hide:

At its basic level it's the same old thing, aristocracy scoffing at the notion of rabble without royalty to rule it. The intended design of governmental structure isn't what they view as the way a country and by dangerous extension, a world should be allowed to work. They rely on ring kissers like work em over Rover to falsify and frame communication using ancient tactics, but a fresh mystique in the labeling. Turdblossom refers to this proudly as perception management.

What follows is the definition and history of the expression at wikipedia:

Perception management is a term originated by the U. S. military. The U. S. Department of Defense gives this definition:

Actions to convey and/or deny selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning as well as to intelligence systems and leaders at all levels to influence official estimates, ultimately resulting in foreign behaviors and official actions favorable to the originator’s objectives. In various ways, perception management combines truth projection, operations security, cover and deception, and psychological operations.

The phrase "perception management" has often functioned as a "euphemism" for "an aspect of information warfare." A scholar in the field notes a distinction between "perception management" and public diplomacy, which "does not, as a rule, involve falsehood and deception, whereas these are important ingredients of perception management; the purpose is to get the other side to believe what one wishes it to believe, whatever the truth may be."

Perception management was also known as public diplomacy in the Ronald Reagan era; however, some people also argue perception management is now an accepted part of international strategic influence.

The phrase "perception management" is filtering into common use as a synonym for "persuasion." Public relations firms now offer "perception management" as one of their services. Similarly, public officials who are being accused of shading the truth are now frequently charged with engaging in "perception management" when disseminating information to media or to the general public.

Although perception management operations are typically carried out within the international arena between governments, and between governments and citizens, use of perception management techniques have become part of mainstream information management systems in many ways that do not concern military campaigns or government relations with citizenry. Businesses may even contract with other businesses to conduct perception management for them, or they may conduct it in-house with their public relations staff.

###

So if you're reminded of the insulting 'when I want your opinion, I'll give it to you' there's good reason. The balking heads cheerleaders with the megaphones we see in the media are everything from nip at your ankles chihuahuas to junk yard dogs.

As stated above: "these are important ingredients of perception management; the purpose is to get the other side to believe what one wishes it to believe, whatever the truth may be."
So if you state a message over and over it seems to gain some kind of validity to those that do not know the truth is being manipulated.