Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Attorney Firing Cover-up: A New Player

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 09:19 AM
Original message
US Attorney Firing Cover-up: A New Player
Congress requested ALL documents pertaining to the USA firing. The House Judiciary committee has published the documents produced by the DOJ in response to their inquiry.
DOJ Purgegate Docs

18 Kossacks have completely extracted the emails from these documents. From the email trail, we now have evidence of a systematic cover-up by the White House and DOJ. A majority of emails from Kyle Sampson following the firing have been hidden from Congress. A substantial portion of the emails of Brian Roehrkasse, DOJ spokesman, are being withheld. All emails from Rove deputy Sarah Taylor, and a critical email from Rove deputy J. Scott Jennings have been suppressed. This cover-up is clearly planned, and wilfully executed by the DOJ and White House. Congress and the American People should be INCENSED.

More:
<http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/5/2/85031/81603>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Impeach, convict, imprison
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. impeach, convict, EXTRADITE, and imprison in the Hague for the war criminals!
Edited on Wed May-02-07 10:04 AM by calipendence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. No way!
They are not as good at torturing as we are here in the states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. systematic cover up. Standard republicon operating procedure
republicons = no ethics, no morals, no honor.

Why do republicons HATE America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. because they R all greedy gangsters.
their greed knows no boundary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good on the internet researchers!!!
This is SO much better than the CRAP we get out of the mainstream media!!

:freak: That couldn't by chance be ON PURPOSE, could it? I mean, just because all the top brass that own the media are top republican donors/operatives, they wouldn't be, like, BIASED or anything, right?

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. You've reminded me--not that it's ever far from my mind--that the top brass who own
Edited on Wed May-02-07 10:46 AM by Peace Patriot
our election system are ALSO "top republican donors/operatives." And they are...

DIEBOLD: Until recently, headed by Wally O'Dell, a Bush-Cheney campaign chair and major fundraiser (a Bush "Pioneer," right up there with Ken Lay), who promised in writing to "deliver Ohio's electoral votes to Bush-Cheney in 2004"; and

ES&S: A spinoff of Diebold (similar computer architecture), initially funded by rightwing billionaire Howard Ahmanson, who also gave one million dollars to the extremist 'christian' Chalcedon Foundation (which touts the death penalty for homosexuals, among other things). Diebold and ES&S have an incestuous relationship; they were run by two brothers, Bob and Tod Urosevich.

These are the people who "counted" 80% of the nation's votes in 2004, under a veil of corporate secrecy. And they are STILL counting all our votes...with "TRADE SECRET," PROPRIETARY programming code, and virtually no audit/recount controls.

Makes you kind of wonder, don't it?

They are Republicans. They are Bushites. They are multi-millionaire/billionaires. The secret code that "counts" all our votes is written in their cubicles, by their employees, and inserted into our voting machines and central tabulators, with nary a public eye upon it, ever.

Gee, you think they'd use it to keep those multiple tax cuts for the rich coming in, and keep all the stocks in their war portfolio rising, and to keep commies and homosexuals out of "their" government?

But, but, but...'christians' aren't supposed to lie and cheat, are they? Or become billionaires by the blood of the poor and the innocent?

Naw, these guys love 'Jesus' too much to pull off a heist like that! To manufacture a phony endorsement of war and torture. To keep an idiot puppet in the White House, whose only claim to fame will ever be that he slaughtered half a million innocent people to get their oil.

That would be too...um...hypocritical?



--------------------------

"That couldn't by chance be ON PURPOSE, could it? I mean, just because all the top brass that own the media are top republican donors/operatives, they wouldn't be, like, BIASED or anything, right?" --LoudSue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Another important article on the USA purge
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/2/62425/86437


More Patriot Act Shenanigans and USAgate Hotlist
by Jesselyn Radack
Wed May 02, 2007 at 03:31:45 AM PDT

WARNING: DO NOT READ THIS DIARY OVER BREAKFAST.

We already know that the U.S. Attorney purge was related to one pernicious provision, since repealed, slipped into the inaptly-named "Patriot Act." Under that chestnut, Attorney General Gonzales had the authority to name U.S. Attorney replacements who can serve indefinitely without confirmation. This allowed them to do an end-run around Senate confirmation. Under the previous law, to which we have thankfully returned, unconfirmed replacements can serve for only 120 days, after which the district courts name a successor.

But there is at least one other provision of the Patriot Act that implicated by the U.S. Attorney scandal: the "residency" requirement. It said--conveniently for Gonzales who was siphoning off U.S. Attorneys to serve as headquarters officials at Main Justice--that federal prosecutors could live outside their districts to serve in other jobs. As the Church Lady would say, "How con-veen-ient."

But the back story is much uglier. On November 10, 2005, the Montana U.S. Attorney, William Mercer, had a Republican Senate staffer insert the "live two places at once" residency provision, that would apply retroactively (you'll see why in the next sentence), into a Patriot Act reauthorization bill, which changed the rules so that U.S. Attorneys could pull double-duty (which is really a misnomer, because the U.S. Attorneys who abandoned their districts for Main Justice spent their time almost exclusively at the latter.) Gonzales sent a letter that same day to the Honorable Donald Molloy, a federal judge in Montana, assuring him that Mercer was not violating federal law by spending all his time in D.C. at Main Justice. (Molloy had complained to Gonzales three weeks earlier that Mercer was violating federal law because he "no longer resides in Montana" because he and his family had moved to D.C.)

The hypocrisy really glows because in the U.S. Attorney scandal, the Justice Department fired David Iglesias in part because he was absent from New Mexico too much. And Iglesias a least had a real excuse for his absence--he was fulfilling his service as a Naval Reserve officer--not browning his nose in Gonzales' caboose.

P.S. The Republican Senate staffer who inserted the pernicious provision was Bett Tolman--then counsel to Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.). Tolman is now the U.S. Attorney in Utah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Something interesting about Brian Roehrkasse
Edited on Wed May-02-07 10:56 AM by starroute
When I checked my saved files to see if I had anything on this "new player" mentioned in the Kos post, what came up was (to my surprise) one of the "Plame Indictment" threads here from 2004 -- specifically a quote from Michael Isikoff at Newsweek:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1962806

As a result, sources tell NEWSWEEK, Ridge's department last week asked the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel to analyze what legal steps would be needed to permit the postponement of the election were an attack to take place. Justice was specifically asked to review a recent letter to Ridge from DeForest B. Soaries Jr., chairman of the newly created U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Soaries noted that, while a primary election in New York on September 11, 2001, was quickly suspended by that state's Board of Elections after the attacks that morning, "the federal government has no agency that has the statutory authority to cancel and reschedule a federal election." Soaries, a Bush appointee who two years ago was an unsuccessful GOP candidate for Congress, wants Ridge to seek emergency legislation from Congress empowering his agency to make such a call. Homeland officials say that as drastic as such proposals sound, they are taking them seriously—along with other possible contingency plans in the event of an election-eve or Election Day attack. "We are reviewing the issue to determine what steps need to be taken to secure the election," says Brian Roehrkasse, a Homeland spokesman.

Fascinating and disquieting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does Ptech's UML play any role in the WH/DOJ computer systems ?
Ptech
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptech

Please read 'notable clientele' segment at a minimum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Pelosi '07.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Can't someone bring a RICO suit against these guys?
Hell, we should all be plaintiffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. Cant put the Genie back in the bottle
Well, the time has come, when many forces have intersected to enable this phenomenon they could not anticipate or expect to ever occur. The rapid processing and analysis of the multiple data dumps, making the extracted knowledge ACTIONABLE in real time -- vs "too late" to make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. Jail all the fucking traitors!
I have had it with this group of crooks and liars.

Impeach and imprison!!! and save this nation!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC