Rachel Maddow announces her candidacy to replace Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts!

CLANG

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-31-10 12:31 PM
Original message

Rachel Maddow announces her candidacy to replace Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts!

Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 12:31 PM by CLANG

Made ya look! :rofl: :popcorn:

I personally think that Scott Brown's tall tale should become a self-fulfilling prophesy. Come on, Rachel! Let's take the seat back!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

glinda

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-31-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message

1. No!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

RKP5637

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-31-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message

2. Keeps it up he well might find himself defeated in the election and I would say good riddance. He's

Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 12:37 PM by RKP5637

now lying too much. I think the dem opposition (not Rachel) well might defeat him. I hope so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

John1956PA

(282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-31-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message

3. Got me! I think I will stay off the Internet tomorrow to avoid the April 1st pranks.

Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

old mark

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-31-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message

4. Keep lying, Scotty - you got it, let's see you keep it.......nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

valerief

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-31-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message

5. I want a Scott Brown scandal. A little toe-tapping in a men's room would suffice. We don't need

Vitter diapers or anything that nutty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

cutlassmama

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-31-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #5

9. Let's hope he takes a wide stance on that issue

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

RaleighNCDUer

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-31-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message

6. No, i think we are much better off with her not being answerable to

the electorate. No compromises, even necessary ones. There are too few good leftish voices out there to have hers silenced by the halls of congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

monmouth

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-31-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #6

7. Absolutely. She drives the right bonkers and that's always a good thing..n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

CLANG

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-31-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #6

8. People like Alan Grayson don't seem to be silenced.

But I was saying that she should run with a partial tongue-in-cheek.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.