Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds To Remove Toxic Ships From Suisun Bay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 01:25 PM
Original message
Feds To Remove Toxic Ships From Suisun Bay
Mar 31, 2010 10:23 am US/Pacific
Feds To Remove Toxic Ships From Suisun Bay By 2017

BENICIA, Calif. (AP) ― The federal government has agreed to remove a decaying armada that has shed toxic paint and other harmful substances into a San Francisco Bay estuary for decades.

The Natural Resources Defense Council on Wednesday said the U.S. Maritime Administration has settled a lawsuit and will remove the decrepit collection of more than 50 obsolete military vessels from Suisun Bay.

Studies by the federal government suggest the old warships have dumped more than 20 tons of copper, lead, zinc and other metals into the estuary. The waterway is a critical habitat for a number of endangered species.

The settlement with environmental groups and state water quality regulators will see half of the "ghost fleet" removed by September 2012. The rest will be gone by September 2017.

http://cbs13.com/local/ghost.fleet.removal.2.1602745.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've been to the ghost fleet in the James River many times. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Remove" - that's sort of like "away"........where are they going to remove them TO?
Unless they take them out of the water and dismantle/recycle them, they haven't solved the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw those exact ships in Suisun bay in 1975 - they were there since WWII.
Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 02:06 PM by old mark
What are they going to do with that old junk? Are they usable for scrap or will they be sunk for reefs for fish?

OK - another article on these ships :

http://cbs13.com/local/ghost.fleet.san.2.1362290.html

They will be cleaned in dry dock and towed to Texas for dismantling. The Bush regime held up this project because they wanted to clean them in place.
It should have been done decades ago, but of course politicians were too "busy".


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's a lot of $crap metal; shouldn't the 'non-restorable' vessels have been sold for
their scrap value?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudbase Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nobody would take them for scrap value.
They have to be towed to the breaker's yard, and the breaker incurs the costs of dismantling the ship and other things like asbestos abatement. I probably sailed on one or two of those ships back in the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. There's no real reason for them to be there anyway.
The Ghost Fleet was placed there because it its proximity to the Mare Island Naval Shipyard. The thinking was that, if they were needed again, the ships could be tugged to the shipyard, restored, and put back into service.

Mare Island was closed in 1996, and has been completely privatized at this point. While the drydocks still exist, the other facilities needed to restore these ships have long since been relocated to other bases.

The Ghost Fleet was left behind because there was no way to tow them elsewhere, and none are capable of moving under their own power. Rather than dealing with it at the time, the Navy decided to ignore them and deal with the problem later.

The simple reality, though, is that any opportunity for these ships to reenter service ended when Mare Island closed. It's good to see that they're finally getting rid of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC