Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Eli Broad alumni are greatly involved in the corporate takeover of education.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 08:47 PM
Original message
How Eli Broad alumni are greatly involved in the corporate takeover of education.
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 09:38 PM by madfloridian
Kansas City, Delaware, and Detroit are often recently mentioned by education bloggers. They are in the news because of their leaders who are alumni of the Broad Superintendent Academy.

Broad Alumni Making It Big in Corporate Takeover of American Education

Eli Broad's Superintendents Academy is paying big dividends for the corporate takeover of American education and the crushing of the teaching profession. In Kansas City a plan developed by Broad's lawyers and Broad Alum, John Covington, will close half of Kansas City Schools with large numbers of corporate charter replacements.


More about the closing of schools in Kansas City by a Broad superintendent.

Broad Academy Alum, John Covington ('08), Shuts Half of Kansas City Schools



The Kansas City School Board was enthused when they hired John Covington (Broad Class of '08) as Superintendent. So was the Kansas City Star's Editorial Board:

"Covington earned good reviews for his work as superintendent of Pueblo City Schools in Colorado over the last three years. He also is a 2008 graduate of the Los Angeles-based Broad Superintendents Academy, a program aimed at improving education in urban school districts.

School Board President Marilyn Simmons said the Broad experience, which includes continuing support and advice, was a plus for Covington.

Yes, that continuing support and advice from Eli and the Boys. Now with half the schools empty by this coming Fall, they will be ripe pickings for the property-hungry corporate welfare charters that will likely kill off most of the remaining public schools. The Board voted 5-4 to support the Broad plan to pull the Kansas City Public Schools into the bath tub for drowning.


In Delaware Broad Alumni, Lillian Lowery, will lead the Race to the Top funded initiative to use test scores to decide who teaches in the state. Delaware and Tennessee were the two winners of Arne's money.

And in Detroit, Broad star, Robert Bobb, has a plan developed by the Skillman Foundation, and dismantling of the public system is underway. The public money will continue, of course, even though public voice or public oversight will be a thing of the past.


Bobb is also getting a large portion of his pay from the Broad Foundation. I found it interesting that Governor Granholm is fine with this...in fact it is said she requested it.

From the Courthouse News Service:

Detroit Schools Ask Why Manager Takes Money From Charter Groups

- The Detroit Board of Education and community groups say private foundations are paying the head of the city's ailing public school system $145,000 a year in exchange for his support of charter schools - a glaring conflict of interest. The board says that Robert Bobb, emergency financial manager of Detroit Public Schools, is violating Michigan laws and its constitution by accepting the privately funded portion of his $425,000 annual salary.

Bobb is the only defendant in the complaint in Wayne County Court, Detroit. The board, two community groups and 26 people say the Los Angeles-based Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation, which "aggressively promotes the spread of charter schools nationwide," pays Bobb $56,000, with the remaining $89,000 coming from "undisclosed private sources. Last year Bobb made $84,000 in such "supplemental compensation."


It is apparently with the blessing of Jennifer Granholm.



As proof that the Broad Foundation expects something for its money, the plaintiffs cite a 2009 Wall Street Journal article in which Eli Broad said he was in the "venture philanthropy business."

"Because Bobb has sole and virtually unreviewable control over the $1.4 billion DPS budget, it is especially dangerous to allow the Broad Foundation and similar 'venture philanthropists' to fund one-third of his salary," the complaint states.

The Broad Foundation disagrees. The foundation gave Bobb the money at the request of Gov. Jennifer Granholm, and it "comes without requirement or restriction," Broad spokeswoman Erica Lepping said in an e-mail.


Too many Democratic governors are going along with the corporate hijacking of public schools.

I guess they have to do so. It is the policy of this Democratic administration, pushing the Bush and Gingrich free market education agenda to fruition.

Here is more about how the Broad Foundation gets its guys and gals in to public school systems.

How Eli Broad gets his guys into public school systems to exert control

If the Broad Foundation plants one of its elements in a school district, it is highly likely they will plant another one along with it, so their influence is maximized.

For instance, an element might be:
- The presence of a Broad-trained superintendent
- The placement of Broad Residents into important central office positions
- An "invitation" to participate in a program spawned by the Foundation (such as CRSS's Reform Governance in Action program)
- Offering to provide the district with a free "Performance Management Diagnostic and Planning" experience

The Broad Foundation likes to infiltrate its targets on multiple levels so it can manipulate a wider field and cause the greatest amount of disruption. Venture edu-philanthropists like Gates and Broad proudly call this invasive and destabilizing strategy "investing in a disruptive force." To these billionaires and their henchmen, causing massive disruption in communities across the nation is not a big deal.


Closing schools, highly disruptive indeed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Grand Taurean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gates and company have too much.
Time to raise their taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I am on the fence with Bill Gates also.
So not sure which way he will decide to go. He definitely believes in monopoly methods, and no government, so if he goes that way, he would be on enemies list. If he works because he believes people should have quality diverse education, then that would be a different story.

But they are messing with education, and if they screw it up, there will be much to account for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grand Taurean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I am against Gates and Broad.
I do not support the privatization of the public commons. Enough tax dollars go to subsidize the private sector as is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sometimes one spends too much time on the fence.
And not enough time standing up before the deed is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am on the fence on this one, all depends on motive.
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 09:00 PM by RandomThoughts
And what they want to accomplish. If it is to better education, there are ways to move competitive forces to make for better systems to prosper.

However the natural motive of private sector, profit first, will try and direct the success of education to creation of indoctrination, and making profit, regardless of increase or decrease in educational quality.


And I personally do not trust, nor endorse groups that are not answerable to voters, but only to money to be running education systems.



Also using the race to the top moniker, makes it a bit close to my thoughts, and if they mess it up I will be pissed off. Especially since race to the top should be dismantling corporations. If it is used to dismantle public sector, the government has to still have a regulatory involvement to redirect the profit motive to a motive to educate accurately. Private sector will always fail without constraint.

Basically if they are dismantling a public education to make competition for good education not profit, it fits that model. But at the same time, the big corporations have to be dismantled to recreate viable economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Once the schools are turned over to corporations....
the deed is done.

You can question their motives now, because it will do no good to question them later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Thats my point.
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 09:39 PM by RandomThoughts
They can be ran by corporations, small ones that are competitive with modest incomes and size. But the driving seat should be regulation that changes the actions from profit motive to best education.

If it is turned over to corporations it is wrong, if corporations have to fulfill regulatory structure, then government is still in the driver seat.


Private sector needs to be restrained by a strong governmental regulatory structure. To make sure they act for the good of society, and to avoid race to the bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's just it. Charter schools are not regulated...
and do not have to follow the same rules as public schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Who cares what the motive is?
If Gates has been conned by the corporate education fiends then he might very well be thinking he's doing good. It's the same old problem with those who know nothing about education, never taught a day in their lives, have no experience with children, and lack any foundation in how children learn. They get some money and think they know better than the people who do. Would Gates allow the government to tell him that a person with no computing background, with no programming experience, with no technology production or sales experience will be put on his board to fix the ailing computer industry?

Gates has money. That doesn't make him smart or wise. It just means he has money. He is good at making money. That skill doesn't translate in to helping educate children.

So I don't care what his motive is. He is doing the wrong thing and using his power to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I don't get all of this idolization of Gates and other billionaires
Just because they know how to game the economic system to their advantage doesn't mean they know SQUAT about anything else--ESPECIALLY schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. They get called clever
because they lie and cheat enough to be rich. The are thought wise because they don't live by the same rules that society does.

Basically, they are envied because they have money. It makes no difference how they got it or how they keep it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Well Said +1
Many people think having money or power is the same thing as being qualified to do something, when often money is not made by anything that qualifies as a better style of life to be taught to the next generation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. I can't speak out against closing nearly half of the schools in KC
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 09:09 PM by proud2BlibKansan
The population in the school district dropped by 25% in 40 years. There were 70,000 kids in 1970, 35,000 in 1999 and 17,000 this year.

You can't run a district in the red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Did they move from there? That many? From 70,000 to 17,000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yes they left the city
KCMO is actually very large. There are at least 10 school districts within the city of KCMO. The KCSD is in the central core. The population in the central core has been greatly reduced in just the last 20-25 years. People move to the inner ring suburbs, many of which are still in the city limits, but in different school districts. So the city's population has not shrank as much as the district's.

Here is a map. The city is in red.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Our school enrollments have varied through the years. They laid off teachers...
rather than closing the school facilities. Then when the enrollment grew again they hired back.

So I am having trouble wrapping my mind around just flat out closing half the schools.

One year a school in which I was teaching lost several hundred enrollment due to a district change. Instead of closing the school they moved the teachers to other schools or laid them off.

Only on occasion have I heard of schools being closed due to low enrollment. They just adjusted the other factors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. KR & JC
Kick, Rec, and Jesus Christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. The superintendent of Washoe County School District
and one of his henchmen are Broadies.

The paper made a big deal about how he and all five of the "unions" in WCSD reached an "agreement" to save money and prevent a slew of layoffs.

Washoe County teachers to make salary concessions, take furlough days

They all sang "Kumbaya" while people are unaware these "unions" in Nevada are nothing more than subsidiaries of the districts. The teachers especially will eventually be screwed over.

Even cutting ten percent of Morrison's pay of $238,000 wouldn't hurt him in the least. That would be more than what a teacher aide or assistant makes in a YEAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. School board already sees Broad influence on Bobb.
But the school board says it can already see the money's influence.

"In Bobb's first year in office, he has acted in a manner consistent with the agenda of the Broad Foundation by closing public schools, contracting with charter companies, and granting contracts to other private companies, often without a valid bidding process," the complaint states.

The board says that Bobb's contract could set a dangerous precedent, as it "paves the way for private payments to purchase influence with members of school boards, the governor, the attorney general, or any other elected or appointed official whom a private organization wants to subsidize in order to support actions that they believe are consistent with their interests."

http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/03/11/25470.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. Teacher's union head was on the faculty of Broad superintendent's academy.
I did not know that. This is from 2002. Also note that Bush's Sec. of Education was on that faculty.

Broad Report Class of 2002

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM 2002 PRESS RELEASES, ETC.:

Participants in the academy will not need to leave their current jobs immediately. They will attend trainings for a number of weekends over a ten-month period in locations across the country. Fellowships, including tuition, travel and all program-related expenses, will be fully covered by The Broad Center. At the end of the training, The Broad Center will help place participants in urban school districts as administrators and superintendents.

The Fellows received guidance from leaders in business, education and the non-profit sectors. Faculty at the Academy included:

* Rod Paige, U.S. Secretary of Education
* Henry Cisneros, CEO, American CityVista
* William Cox, Managing Director, School Evaluation Services
* Chris Cross, Senior Fellow, Center on Education Policy
* Chester E. Finn, Jr., President, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
* Frances Hesselbein, Chairman, The Drucker Foundation
* Don McAdams, Founder, Center for Reform of School Systems
* Donald Nielsen, President, Hazelton Corporation; Chairman, 2WAY Corporation Hugh B. Price, President and CEO, National Urban League
* Paul Ruiz, Principal Partner, Education Trust
* Adam Urbanski, Director, Teacher Union Reform Network
* Randi Weingarten, President, United Federation of Teachers


Perhaps that is why she would do something like this.

Everyone who has followed Weingarten's ascendancy to her position as AFT President knew that she had been the pick of the Oligarchs. Her earlier sweet talk about gutting the teaching profession with pay per score plans had earned her the Business Roundtable's seal of approval, and now she is returning the favor by shifting her tepid endorsement of weakening ethical teaching into a full-blown advocacy for busting her own union. Randi Weingarten should be recalled by the AFT membership, and she should be put out to pasture with the other nags.

At a time when the greed merchants and uncharged felons of Wall Street burrow into the system once more to plan another financial catastrophe a few years hence, Obama's man in charge of deciding how many millions the CEO criminals should get has just been subcontracted out by Weingarten to create a plan to fire teachers for their "misconduct." The scourge of the nation--teacher misconduct!! Misconduct will surely include refusing to go along with educational genocide that is occurring in urban schools, where cognitive decapitation in segregated environments is the order of the day for the poor and the brown.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. "Misconduct" for teachers isn't about committing egregious offenses, such as crimes
Edited on Tue Apr-06-10 01:07 PM by tonysam
No, "misconduct" is anything a principal or other administrators say it is, and they are willing to rig a teacher's due process rights and commit REAL misconduct (perjury, suborning perjury, forgery, bribery, etc.) to support their phony claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Completely agree about Randi
Don't like her at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n.michigan Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. Teachers-FIRE Weingarten. Just sickening. NEA who leads you?
Edited on Thu Apr-08-10 11:29 AM by n.michigan

Probably another Obama deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
19. Recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Madfloridian, I would like you to elaborate more on this "Broad....................
.......Foundation" some more. I have not read ALL your posts, but lately with the increasing privatization of the schools I have been reading you whenever you post. I have to admit, that in the limited reading and watching video media you are one of a small group that educated the public about their public schools and what exactly is happening to them. This is the first I have heard of this "Broad Alumni" and if you would post for all of us exactly how this is all tied together.

Thx
Marty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cjbgreen Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Follow the Money
One needs to follow the money and why Obama is allowing corporate takeover of schools becomes clear. Protecting public schools needed to be tossed in order to retain the support of Eli Broad and Bill Gates. Unfortunately, children from urban centers and poverty once again loose as does our society. I voted for Obama, I deplore that our children are being sacrificed and that we are creating schools using failed business models.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Here is extensive coverage...new report up just this week.
http://thebroadreport.blogspot.com/

It is run by the same lady who does the Perimeter Primate blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. The excellent blog, The Broad Report,
Edited on Tue Apr-06-10 08:54 PM by tonysam
has about EVERYTHING anybody needs to know about Eli Broad and his campaign to destroy public education:

The Broad Report

The superintendent's academy is an important part, although Broad is spending more time directly getting involved in various school districts, especially Detroit, his hometown.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n.michigan Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. Granholm is a not liked. NPR (Terry Gross) has Broad $$ as a sponsor- Protest
FYI. I was listening to Interlochen Public Radio and Terry Gross' program on NPR. During a break they acknowledged sponsorship of Eli Broad Superintendent's Academy. As a devotee of "public" radio- I was totally sickened.


We need to stop this "buy out." Broad is a rich pusher- and it appears power hungry. Granholm is a sellout and certainly should not be put on our Supreme Court. She has no backbone for the people.

MEA should act for teachers.

Boycott NPR or at least make some phone calls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
32. thanks for bringing this to light. We've got to call this CORRUPT to scare Dems away from it.
or they will give away the store.

This is just another part of the giveaway of the commons to the already wealthy that seems to be a bipartisan scam to screw us out of what belongs to all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC