Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Letter Writing Campaign For Phoebe Prince

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Yehonala Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:16 PM
Original message
Letter Writing Campaign For Phoebe Prince
Why don't we start a letter writing campaign to the court to encourage them to give solid, real sentences to these monsters and not give them a slap on the wrist? By doing that we'll ensure that justice is done. This would be a perfect way for the public to put the screws to the judicial system too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd actually like to participate in this. Those monsters deserve nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would like to participate too
Please post info when you get the chance.

Bullying needs to be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. That would be counter productive.
For example, the Birthers use such tactics and it simply pisses off the judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yehonala Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is different.........
I think this is a lot different than the birthers. It would sway public opinion and people are already eager to have the judges coem down hard on this scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Write letters to your Congressperson. judges only want letters from
interested parties. Sure, everyone who writes to a judge thinks they are 'helping' but what you are really doing is bolstering the defense's motion for change of venue and sequestration.

Leave the judge alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yehonala Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Will do.
Got it, thanks for the advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good heavens, they haven't even been convicted yet
You know, I think there's a good chance that the accused are guilty and deserve a hefty sentence...but the administration of justice is not something people get to vote on. People vote on (state) laws or who makes the laws in Congress - and I have seen your agreement upthread that it makes more sense to write to congress about this. I'm not writing to have a dig at you personally, but to point out the fundamental issue here.

But it's important to remember that no matter how horrible a crime is, everyone has the right to a fair trial and to mount the best defense that they can. It's a constitutional right that protects everyone, whether or not they're nice people. Similarly, there are constitutional protections about fairness in sentencing and there are already statutory guidelines to inform judges about that process.

In cases like this, sending mail to a court demanding a particular verdict or sentence will only result in the mail being shredded or at least thrown into storage by the clerk of the court. It never gets near the judge, and rightly so. If we assessed guilt or punishment on the basis of popular opinion we'd be missing the whole point of having courts and laws to begin with; the result would be something much closer to a lynch mob.

It really bothers me that so many people rely on emotion instead of reason when talking about legal cases. If I ever found myself falsely accused of a horrible crime, I would seriously consider waiving my right to a jury trial and opting for a bench trial (just judges instead of a jury). I would feel a lot more confident of the truth being perceived by a judge who would carefully study the facts and explain their finding in writing using logic, than by a jury which could be swayed by all kinds of emotional arguments from a prosecutor, even if they were warned not to consider those issues when drawing their conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC