Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Van Hollen Vows Dems Will Go On Offense, Ties GOP To Big Banks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 03:36 PM
Original message
Van Hollen Vows Dems Will Go On Offense, Ties GOP To Big Banks
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/house-republicans/van-hollen-dems-will-go-on-offense-pound-gop-over-derivatives-trading/
Greg Sargent's blog

As you know, yesterday Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell finally revealed the GOP strategy on the financial regulation fight: Republicans will oppose reform legislation on the grounds that it will lead to endless bailouts — an effort to position Republicans as the populists in this battle.

That leaves Dems with a challenge: How can they create clear, revelatory moments that persuade voters that they, not Republicans, are really the ones on the people’s side?

In an interview, DCCC chief Chris Van Hollen told me Dems will mount a big push to make this case on a new front — derivatives trading — as they make a broad case that the GOP is the party of big banks. “This is a defining issue that tells people which side you’re on,” Van Hollen said.


(snip)
“This will be a very important issue in this fight,” Van Hollen said. “Derivatives and other exotic financial instruments are part of the story of what got us into this mess. It’s absolutely essential that we have transparency and accounability when it comes to the derivatives market. This is a defining issue.”

“The issue is, who pays when banks make a bad decision — the banks or the taxyapers?” Van Hollen continued. “Republicans want the taxpayers on the hook. They support business as usual on Wall Street, which means having taxpayers bail out the banks, rather than holding the banks accountable for their own mistakes.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. good luck with that
Clinton signed a lot of the deregulation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ROFL
:rofl:

Umm, you have good luck with THAT! See if blaming Clinton works for you. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not blaming Clinton... just that MSM is going to drag him in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Fail
As I said, good luck with THAT.

In case you haven't noticed, it's 2010. Clinton is so '90's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm unsure about this.
It is true that not just Clinton but many of the congressional Democrats were complicit and actively spearheaded these backward changes back then. Many of the sames are still around. We need to argue, however, if needed, that the party is different now and we're the party of the people and not the few and privileged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, Clinton Is Irrelevant
No one is going to be talking about Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I pretty much agree.
And if they do, then it's an issue. No point in speculating regarding that right now. It was a long time ago. Nixon no relevance to Reagan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. And Obama will sign Regulation
It really does not matter who did what when, what matters now is if we will fix it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Eddie played a great guitar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Shrug - we'll see. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC