Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA wins (another) battle to suppress the truth (and the media could not care less)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 10:52 AM
Original message
CIA wins (another) battle to suppress the truth (and the media could not care less)
In my recent item re: the Martin Luther King Records Act, I mentioned the CIA’s resistance to the lawsuit over their refusal to release all records pertinent to JFK’s assassination. I said that the Agency was fighting “tooth and nail” against that effort.

Well, it turns out I was wrong–because the CIA had lately won its case when I sent out that email:

CIA Wins Summary Judgment (again) on Morley Case

Judge Richard Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has found for the CIA in journalist Jefferson Morley’s quest for records about former CIA employee George Joannides. The case was before the court after it had previously been remanded by the D.C. Court of Appeals in 2008.

The court found that the CIA had properly searched for records after the remand of the case and also approved of the withholdings made pursuant to FOIA exemptions 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 as well as the use of glomar for other records. Morley did receive a number of documents upon the remand search, but he sought more in opposing the CIA’s motion for summary judgment.

It is likely that Morley will appeal this decision.

The decision can be found here: Download Morley: http://thefoiablog.typepad.com/files/morley.pdf

Now, if I didn’t have a friend who happens to be up on all of this, I never would have known about this legal victory by the Agency – whose efforts to suppress the truth succeed so well because our “free press” so obligingly ignores them.

MCM

http://markcrispinmiller.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good. The court upheld FOIA.
Change the law if you're not getting enough paper. I've had nothing but good responses with the CIA's FOIA office. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. They couldn't suppress the wave-off vid. All I need to see. Thanks.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. So, Crime In Action first directed him to the National Archives?
They're going to try to out run him. I hope he doesn't give up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What's unreasonable?
From the PDF:
...It is now clear that the CIA is justified in its use of Exemption 6 to withhold personal biographical information from both the 2004 and 2008 productions. Indeed, much of what the CIA withheld was personal data like social security numbers, dates and locations of birth, tax information, addresses, and phone numbers. (Nelson Decl. 7 122- 37.) As the CIA explains in reasonable detail, it withheld this kind of information for Joannides's immediate family members, emergency contacts, colleagues, and intelligence sources, because the consequences to flow from its release could be damaging. For instance, heightened media contact and scrutiny would no doubt be a "clearly unwarranted" invasion of Joannides's children's personal privacy. (Nelson Decl. 7 138.) Likewise, Joannides's colleagues and sources might expect heightened media scrutiny, or, worse, some form of retribution for their past work....


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. For starters, LYING and saying the material was in the National Arhives?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Devil's advocate: it probably should've been there.
Not an unreasonable assumption for docs of that age.

Again, my experience has been the CIA's FOIA office have been great. I even got a follow-up on a project I'd abandoned when someone else got the info first -- a phone call, of all things, with a guy saying he knew the info was public now, but if I still wanted it to call him back.

Granted, a message on your machine from the CIA is a little surprising at first. I called him back to thank him; it was like talking to a librarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. They job was not to assume were those documents where but to produce them.
Edited on Thu Apr-15-10 03:31 PM by EFerrari
I'm sure Hitler employed nice librarians, too. I worked with a lot of nice people when I translated for the DEA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MinM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. George Joannides » Bobby Ray Inman » Don Blankenship

Photo: In July 1981, retired CIA undercover officer George Joannides (left) received the Distinguished Intelligence Medal for "exceptional achievement" from deputy CIA director Bobby Ray Inman. Among Joannides' achievements were concealing from JFK investigatiors his role in guiding and monitoring a Cuban exile group that gathered intelligence and generated propaganda about accused presidential assassin Lee Harvey Oswald before President Kennedy was killed. (Credit: CIA)
Dead Spy's JFK Files Pose a Test for Obama's FOIA Order | TPMCafe


Massey Energy CEO Don Blankenship

This stuff matters and these people shape current events...

CIA & Right Wing, "Nutcase" Paw Prints on Massey Coal Mining Disaster - The Education Forum

:dem: & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks for that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC