|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:46 PM Original message |
Breaking: North Korea torpedoed South Korea's Navy ship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah that is an act of war... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 11:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. The war never ended--- thiere is only a CEASE FIRE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. times like this I am glad the cool headed Obama is in charge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Absolutely. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. *snort* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
3. NOT good. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. If true, that's not good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. A clear-cut Act of War. We should expect more trouble from that quarter, unfortunately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 05:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
33. There seems to be uncertainty within the leadership. Kim's been in bad health, etc. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
8. OH. SHIT. This is NOT good AT ALL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grand Taurean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
9. If confirmed, this is considered by all standards and act of war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. No, it's not bad cause there never has been a truce in the Korean war anyway, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 09:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Yep but it could be the END of the truce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. "Analysts said there is little South Korea can do even if Pyongyang is found to be the culprit," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prometheus Bound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 10:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. That's the part I noticed too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 10:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. OK, if South Korea can't do squat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebenaube (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. not necessarily... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 12:26 AM Response to Reply #12 |
26. A military response will hurt more than Seoul's economy. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 12:32 AM Response to Reply #12 |
30. Not to mention the destruction of Seoul and most of the people in it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
13. Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
15. Has Any South Korean Official Put His Name On This Claim? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
16. South Korea will be chomping at the bit to retaliate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
19. I think old Kim would be chest beating and posturing if this was true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diclotican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
20. thewiseguy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
21. Remember the Alamo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 11:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Remember the unarmed EC121 that was shot down in the late 1960s. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
22. This is so bizarre |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnroshan (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
25. Same ol.. same ol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 12:29 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. I think SK does have more to lose than NK does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 12:32 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Such a strike would be impossible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 05:42 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. It wouldn't be SK calling that shot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 06:00 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. It'd be just as impossible for the US to do successfully. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. I didn't mean "doing it", I meant "ordering it" - or, more importantly, not ordering it /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 12:52 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. North Korea has, by some estimates, over 10,000 fortified artillery placements... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
27. Is there any corroboration on this beyond "a news report says?" (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 05:38 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. No, and that is a very good question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
29. This could be very bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 05:58 AM Response to Original message |
34. Hmmmmmmmmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 05:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Someone said that somebody thought they heard.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 06:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Wars and rumors of wars... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC