Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are you ready for some "feeble" reform??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:08 PM
Original message
Are you ready for some "feeble" reform??
According to Robert Kuttner, economist, the Democrats had a very fractious meeting yesterday. Some wanted to bring the financial reform bill to the floor for amendments but Chris Dodd wanted to work out a "bi-partisan" bill with Richard Shelby.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/financial-reform-at-a-cro_b_549424.html

<snip>
On Thursday, there was an uncharacteristically fractious meeting of the Senate Democratic Caucus. On one side, leading progressives such as Maria Cantwell, Ted Kaufman, Dick Durbin, Byron Dorgan, and Jeff Merkley, argued that this was a moment to put forward floor amendments that would both strengthen the bill and force Republicans to take difficult votes either backing reforms or identifying themselves with Wall Street.

But the Banking Committee Chairman, Chris Dodd, was more inclined to try and strike deal over the weekend with his Republican counterpart, Richard Shelby, for a bipartisan bill. The price of this would be weaker provisions on derivatives, consumer protection, and on resolving failed large banks. The political price would be that progressives don't get to offer floor amendments. Under Dodd's scheme, which is favored by Obama's legislative and economic advisers, the Senate would immediately vote to take up the bill, and would then vote cloture by a wide bipartisan margin. The bill -- still a shell with details to be filled in later -- would go directly to the House, where the House-passed bill would become the vehicle for the final measure.

<snip>
What stands in the way of this bipartisan deal is the resolve of the Senate progressives and the personal dilemma of the Senate Democratic leader, Harry Reid. Senator Reid faces a very difficult re-election in Nevada this November. He needs to present himself as a fighter for the common American, not as an agent of Wall Street. If Reid weighs in hard on Dodd, and if Obama gets personally engaged, he can still head off a deal with Shelby and the Republicans for a backroom deal and a weakened bill.

It would be nice if somebody whose phone calls Obama still takes -- Reid, Dick Durbin, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi -- broke through the wall that Rahm Emanuel has put up and got the president to play a personal role. Otherwise, this could be one of those dreadful lost moments of reform and progressive triumph.

.more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here we go again.
Capitulation we can believe in ... that always, on the balance, favors BIG BUSINESS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Repeal the repeal of Glass-Steagal
just put it back in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't want a bi-partisan bill?
Let your reps know your views.

Call to support the Brown-Kaufman safe banking act.

Or give up and do nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. fortunately or unfortunately, that's how governments work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. "If Reid weighs in hard on Dodd, and if Obama gets personally engaged, he can still head off a deal"
So there's our game plan. I don't think this article is doom and gloom. Call your Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. So if the Republicans demand this reform outlaw the Democratic Party
will we meet them halfway, in the spirit of holy bipartisanship?

Bipartisanship = Democrats enacting the Republican agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC