Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diabetes Death Watch Slipped Into Health Law by Lilly, Novo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:35 PM
Original message
Diabetes Death Watch Slipped Into Health Law by Lilly, Novo
By Drew Armstrong

April 30 (Bloomberg) -- More than 70,000 Americans a year die from complications of diabetes, making it the country’s fifth-largest medical killer. While that sounds dire, Novo Nordisk A/S says the real picture may be worse.

That’s why the Bagsvaerd, Denmark-based drugmaker, the world’s top supplier of insulin, lobbied to get a provision in the U.S. health law that will push doctors to list diabetes more often as a cause of death, Bloomberg Businessweek reported in its May 3 edition. A higher toll means more public and private funding for treatment, detection and prevention, said Michael Mawby, Novo’s Washington lobbyist, in an interview.

<SNIP>

In coming months, regulations will spell out precisely how the new law will be applied. After that, when a patient dies from diabetes complications, such as a heart attack or a stroke, coroners and physicians will be encouraged to list diabetes on the death certificate.

<SNIP>

By not listing diabetes as a cause of death, physicians “certainly underestimate the impact,” said Robert Anderson, chief of the CDC’s mortality statistics branch, in a telephone interview. According to the agency’s data, diabetes is the fifth biggest killer in the U.S. after heart disease, cancer, stroke, and respiratory illnesses.

<SNIP>
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&sid=ad044bJ3k3co
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. This isn't that bad an idea. Instead of going after heart disease with
anti-cholesterol drugs, maybe we need to find out why so many people are now insulin resistant. I suspect we've been chasing the symptoms and not the cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. it certainly doesn't hurt to have a more accurate recording of cause(s) of death
although it seems to me the best way to do this would be to have coroners list cause of death including contributing factors. "Cause of death = septic shock" doesn't provide nearly as much useful information as "cause of death = septic shock secondary to untreated diabetic foot ulcer."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah because
actally informing people about the mortality associated with diabetes is just wrong somehow... I guess :shrug:


Diabetes is responsible for a lot of deaths and will be responsible for many many more if we don't do something about obesity. Novo Nordisk doesn't need this to ensure a healthy profit from the people of this country.

Novo sells a lot of insulin, they also provide and fund one of the best "how to prevent programs" in the pharmacutical industry for any disease or condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revolution breeze Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Complicated
My half sister, a lifelong diabetic, suffered a seizure due to low blood sugar while driving. Her car hit a tree and on the way to the hospital she suffered cardiac arrhythmia, which could have been due to the diabetes or the injuries sustained in the crash. She lived for 6 days. Cause of death - trauma sustained in the automobile accident, but it could be argued that cause of death was diabetes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think there should be a whole lot more funding for detection and prevention. It's estimated
that in 30 years 40% of the population will have diabetes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC