Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP fought against regulations requiring emergency relief valve! (most effective and successful)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:12 AM
Original message
BP fought against regulations requiring emergency relief valve! (most effective and successful)
Edited on Sat May-01-10 08:12 AM by goodboy
The Wall Street Journal reports that the well lacked a remote-control shut-off switch that is required by Brazil and Norway, two other major oil-producing nations. The switch, a back-up measure to shut off oil flow, would allow a crew to remotely shut off the well even if a rig was damaged or sunken. BP said it couldn't explain why its primary shut-off measures did not work.

U.S. regulators considered requiring the mechanism several years ago. They decided against the measure when drilling COMPANIES PROTESTED, saying the COST WAS TOO HIGH, the device was only questionably effective, and that primary shut-off measures were enough to control an oil spill. A 2001 industry report argued against the shut-off device:

"Significant doubts remain in regard to the ability of this type of system to provide a reliable emergency back-up control system during an actual well flowing incident."

However, a spokeswoman for Norway's Petroleum Safety Authority said the switches have "been seen as the most successful and effective option" in North Sea usage. Several oil producers, including Royal Dutch Shell, sometimes use the switch even when it is not required by country regulations.


HOW MANY FUCKING EXPLOSIONS AND SPILLS HAVE THERE BEEN ON NORWEGIAN RIGS?

http://www.whistleblower.org/blog/31-2010/534-troubling-details-emerge-about-bps-oil-platform-explosion

AND WHILE I'M AT IT: DON'T FORGET DICK!

The Washington Post reported on November 15, 2005 that it had obtained documents detailing how executives from major oil corporations, including Exxon-Mobil Corp., Conoco, Royal Dutch Shell Oil Corp., and the American subsidiary of British Petroleum met with Energy Task Force participants while they were developing national energy policy. Vice President Cheney was reported to have met personally with the Chief Executive Officer of BP (formerly British Petroleum) during the time of the Energy Task Force's activities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Louisiana folks should drag the DIck
into the oil infested swamps for a bath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. it makes me ill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. LA is red.
They voted for Bush-Cheney... now they're paying the price.

And also, Jindal is begging for welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I'm trying to separate Jindal from the good folks in
Louisiana but it is hilarious watching him grovel for Federal funds and resources - the little shrimp who opposed volcano monitoring. He and his fellow ReTHUGS opposed any monitoring for BP et al - they're consistent though - privatize profits and socialize risks. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. If only the worst of this could be directed at them.
Too many innocents in the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. They will be time to deal with them
Obama now has real power to deal with both big coal and big oil - let's see how he uses this political capital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. And take Joe with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Shoot somebody

I mean it. The executives responsible for this should be executed by firing squad, on television, on an oil rig. Their carcasses should be dumped in a chipper and the resulting chum dumped in the Gulf. Give a little back.

Yeah I'm pissed, and I realize that my nasty fantasy accomplishes nothing. There will always be someone else to fill those shoes as long as the rewards are there. What really needs killing is Capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. We learn as children that we have to clean up our own messes. These
fucks should be fined into financial oblivion - AND made to clean up this mess with their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. So why are the tea bags not protesting this action
Seems to me they protested nothing the bush administration did to get us into this mess, but they are protesting what the Obama administration is doing to try to fix it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. their gripe is a black President...otherwise, they're not interested
Edited on Sat May-01-10 09:30 AM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Your statement succinctly defines the "tea baggers" bottom line. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. +1 (if I could) (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBI_Un_Sub Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. The hand of Cheney ...
We are still paying for Cheney.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC