Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Contemptible Quitter PALIN attempts to hang Watergate on (whomever--besides Rethugs).

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 10:28 AM
Original message
Contemptible Quitter PALIN attempts to hang Watergate on (whomever--besides Rethugs).
Edited on Sat May-01-10 10:32 AM by UTUSN
O.K., so we all knew that her debut, convention speech was written by others, but apparently she was right to chafe under the restrictions put on her by hidebound professional pols because, if she herself is coming up with all the sleazy CRAP that she vomits, she truly has her own talent groove.


**********QUOTE********

http://gawker.com/5528391/palin-hacker-convicted-she-compares-case-to-watergate

Palin Hacker Convicted, She Compares Case to Watergate


A Tennessee jury convicted David Kernell, 20, the kid who hacked into Sarah Palin's email account in 2008, of computer fraud and obstruction of justice. Palin, modest and magnanimous as ever, compared the case to Watergate in a Facebook message.

Kernell, according to Fox News (this thread/link is from Gawker), escaped two other convictions — he was found not guilty of wire fraud and the jury deadlocked on an identity theft charge. The onetime University of Tennessee student, faces up to 21 years in jail for the offences. Palin, who testified at the trial, just posted this wildly self-aggrandizing message on her Facebook page:

****"My family and I are thankful that the jury thoroughly and carefully weighed the evidence and issued a just verdict. Besides the obvious invasion of privacy and security concerns surrounding this issue, many of us are concerned about the integrity of our country's political elections. America's elections depend upon fair competition. Violating the law, or simply invading someone's privacy for political gain, has long been repugnant to Americans' sense of fair play. As Watergate taught us, we rightfully reject illegally breaking into candidates' private communications for political intrigue in an attempt to derail an election."****


Send an email to Ravi Somaiya, the author of this post, at ravi@gawker.com.

********UNQUOTE********
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC