Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Likely To Pick a Woman For Supreme Court (sourced)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 12:55 PM
Original message
Obama Likely To Pick a Woman For Supreme Court (sourced)
Three. That may be the number to pay close attention to as we await President Obama's choice to replace Justice John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court. And it may also be the best clue as to why President Obama will likely choose a woman to fill the vacancy. Two senior administration officials say the prospect of adding significant gender diversity to the high court has been a major consideration for Obama. Obama has privately told friends and aides, these sources say, that he would like nothing more than to be the first president to elevate three women to the bench.

The appeal of this approach is clear. Despite the political media's short-term view of SCOTUS nominations, these are the moments when all presidents think about their legacies and their ability to shape history. Because the justices who already retired or are likely to soon (David Souter, John Paul Stevens, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg) are also the most liberal, Obama probably won't be able to fundamentally alter the ideological mix of the court. So if he can't change the court's direction, he'll want to change the way it looks. If he leaves office with three, or maybe even four, women on the Supreme Court bench, Obama will cement his place in history as a powerful guardian of the interests of American women.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/237338?from=rss


:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:

Note the 3 bounces...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cool. Lord knows there are plenty of qualified ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. KNR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, please.
As someone observed upthread, there are plenty of qualified female judges/legal scholars to choose from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. The next three appointees should be women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good. A nice healthy youngish woman. Not that it will make much of a difference.
Nader, the GOP, and the court itself has given us a conservative court for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Will she be Harvard educated? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. We can find women who didn't go to an Ivy League school.
We need geographical diversity, too. And even tho I have several Ivy Leaguers in my family (not me), I think it is long overdue for some candidates outside of the Ivy establishment. Enough is enough...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Or isn't Jewish or Catholic
need diversity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. I just hope whoever he appoints is an actual liberal
gender or race come second to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Works for me. There's a broad and deep pool of qualified women in this country by now...
Hillary Clinton's generation of female law students forged the pathway for hundreds of thousands of other women to enter law.

I used to hardly dare hope we'd get more women on the High Court, and now I can hardly wait. :woohoo: :toast:

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. imagine rulings on abortion and women's rights
getting decided with all the women on one side of an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not exactly a shock. The majority of his short list is women.
I still like Sidney Thomas though--more and more as I read about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. I just want a young, healthy liberal
And I keep hoping that Scalia will quit, with Thomas quickly following him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. An Asian female
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. anyone in mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
19.  Mazie Hirono D 2nd Hi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greencharlie Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's Kagan, and she's confirmed with 70+. Book it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I agree, predicted it nearly a year ago and... I hope she is the nominee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. Can you imagine the outrage if there were a Supreme Court with as many as five women?
All of a sudden it would be a "women's" Court. Whereas it wasn't considered a "men's" Court when it was all male, just a Court.

Having three of the justices be women is the least Obama can do for gender equity. Four would be wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
20. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC