Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deal allows identities and numbers of suspected sex abusers within Catholic Church to remain secret

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 06:12 AM
Original message
Deal allows identities and numbers of suspected sex abusers within Catholic Church to remain secret
Deal allows secrets to remain

By John Stucke
Staff writer
May 4, 2007

The public may never know how many Catholic priests sexually abused children in Eastern Washington. Nor will parishioners know how their money is being spent, despite being asked to contribute $10 million to settle sex-abuse claims.

Perhaps most alarming, however, is that priests accused of sexual abuse remain within the diocese ministry.

Because of sealed court records and an unusual arrangement that one lawyer touted as an “alternative judicial system,” the full disclosure long demanded by victims in the Spokane Catholic Diocese’s long-running bankruptcy case may never happen.

All sides in the case — including Bishop William Skylstad, committees representing sex abuse victims, and parish representatives — agreed to this unique set-up, which allows victims to present accusations of abuse to an independent claims reviewer who will decide if an accusation has merit and how much money should be paid. No information about those payouts, including the names of priests on whom claims were paid, will be made public in court filings, attorneys involved in the settlement agreement say.

<snip>

Yet a review of approximately half of the confidential claims filed in the case, which were obtained by The Spokesman-Review, show at least 38 priests and others associated with the church have been accused. Besides the eight priests named by the diocese, the list includes at least three priests still active in the ministry. Some on the list are outside the parish or are Jesuits and thus outside the jurisdiction of the diocese.

More:
http://www.spokesmanreview.com/breaking/story.asp?ID=9766
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is "alternative" a brand new synonym for "corrupt???"
Alternative judicial system???? Come ON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC